Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
Systematic effects of patient factors and scanner/protocol factors on a Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) quantitative MRI biomarker for prostate cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Do Deondre D, Domingo Mariluz Rojo, Conlin Christopher C, Matthews Ian, Kallis Karoline, Baxter Madison T, Ollison Courtney, Song Yuze, Xu George, Zhong Allison Y, Bagrodia Aditya, Barrett Tristan, Cooperberg Matthew, Feng Felix, Hahn Michael E, Harisinghani Mukesh, Hollenberg Gary M, Javier-Desloges Juan, Kamran Sophia C, Kane Christopher J, Kessler Dimitri, Kuperman Joshua, Lee Kang-Lung, Levine Jonathan, Liss Michael A, Margolis Daniel J A, Murphy Paul M, Nakrour Nabih, Ohliger Michael A, Osinski Thomas, Pamatmat Anthony James, Pompa Isabella R, Rakow-Penner Rebecca, Roberts Jacob L, Santhosh Karan, Shabaik Ahmed S, Song David, Tempany Clare M, Trecarten Shaun, Wehrli Natasha, Weinberg Eric P, Woolen Sean, Dale Anders M, Seibert Tyler M
Аннотация
While multiparametric MRI has revolutionized clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection, conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps suffer from a monoexponential model that conflate the various forms of diffusion in the tissue, leading to poor microstructural specificity and substantial inter-scanner variability. Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) addresses these limitations with a multi-compartment biophysical model that separates the diffusion signal into four compartments, providing a more specific quantitative imaging biomarker, the Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs). Although RSIrs has demonstrated promising detection performance for csPCa, patient- and acquisition-related factors may influence its measured values and performance. Our retrospective analysis included 1,890 men (median age 70) from seven centers between 2018 and 2024. Our primary objective was to characterize the quantitative technical robustness of RSIrs using linear modeling. We assessed how age, race, ethnicity, prostate volume, medication use, and MRI acquisition parameters influenced prostate maximum RSIrs (RSIrsmax) values. Secondary, we conducted a functional validation of RSIrs’ csPCa detection performance when accounting for any significant effects (if any). Non-csPCa patients in this analysis were (1) with confirmed benign or Grade Group 1 findings on biopsy or (2) with a non-suspicious mpMRI (PI-RADS 1 or 2) and a prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) ≤ 0.15. Results revealed modest effects from age (1.8/year increase), prostate volume (-0.83/mL decrease), and acquisition methods (varying between − 63.14 to + 56.23). While these acquisition- and patient-level variations partially overlapped with change in RSIrsmax due to Grade Group 2 csPCa, these variations were secondary to the primary signal variation due to csPCa. Adjusting for them did not improve csPCa detection performance (p > 0.05). AUC of RSIrsmax for patient-level csPCa detection was 0.77 [95% CI: 0.75–0.79] compared to 0.74 [0.72–0.76] after. RSIrs demonstrates robust csPCa detection performance regardless of modest signal variations from patient and acquisition factors, supporting its potential as a generalizable quantitative imaging biomarker for csPCa.