Journal of vascular research · 2017
Peripheral Endothelial Function and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Are Not Associated in Women with Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The iPOWER Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Flintholm Raft Kristoffer, Frestad Daria, Michelsen Marie Mide, Suhrs Hannah Elena, Rask Anna Bay, Nilsson Malin, Hermann Thomas Steffen, Prescott Eva
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We investigated whether impaired flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and plasma biomarkers reflecting endothelial dysfunction are associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS: Patients (n = 194) were randomly selected women with angina pectoris and no obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis). A reference population of asymptomatic women without CAD (n = 25) was included. We measured FMD in the brachial artery by high-resolution ultrasound. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) was assessed by transthoracic Doppler flow echocardiography (TTDE) of the left anterior descending artery during rest and high-dose dipyridamole infusion. CMD was defined as CFVR <2.
RESULTS: FMD and CFVR were measured in 128 patients and 21 controls. Mean (SD) age was 64.5 (8.9) years, mean CFVR was 2.3 (2.0-2.7), and mean FMD was 8.4% (4.8%) in angina patients. Angina patients had a higher risk factor burden compared with the reference population. Measures of peripheral endothelial dysfunction and endothelial plasma biomarkers did not differ according to angina or CFVR. CFVR and FMD did not correlate (Spearman ρ = -0.07, p = 0.45).
CONCLUSIONS: FMD and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction did not identify individuals with CMD assessed as impaired CFVR by TTDE in women with angina and no obstructive CAD.
METHODS: Patients (n = 194) were randomly selected women with angina pectoris and no obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis). A reference population of asymptomatic women without CAD (n = 25) was included. We measured FMD in the brachial artery by high-resolution ultrasound. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) was assessed by transthoracic Doppler flow echocardiography (TTDE) of the left anterior descending artery during rest and high-dose dipyridamole infusion. CMD was defined as CFVR <2.
RESULTS: FMD and CFVR were measured in 128 patients and 21 controls. Mean (SD) age was 64.5 (8.9) years, mean CFVR was 2.3 (2.0-2.7), and mean FMD was 8.4% (4.8%) in angina patients. Angina patients had a higher risk factor burden compared with the reference population. Measures of peripheral endothelial dysfunction and endothelial plasma biomarkers did not differ according to angina or CFVR. CFVR and FMD did not correlate (Spearman ρ = -0.07, p = 0.45).
CONCLUSIONS: FMD and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction did not identify individuals with CMD assessed as impaired CFVR by TTDE in women with angina and no obstructive CAD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAngina PectorisBlood Flow VelocityBrachial ArteryCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsDipyridamoleEchocardiography, DopplerEndothelium, VascularFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMicrocirculationMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRegional Blood FlowRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexVasodilationVasodilator Agents