World journal of cardiology · 2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease using single-lead electrocardiogram parameters.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marzoog Basheer Abdullah, Chomakhidze Peter, Gognieva Daria, Silantyev Artemiy, Suvorov Alexander, Abdullaev Magomed, Mozzhukhina Natalia, Filippova Darya Alexandrovna, Kostin Sergey Vladimirovich, Kolpashnikova Maria, Ershova Natalya, Ushakov Nikolay, Mesitskaya Dinara, Kopylov Philipp
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) impacts the quality of life and has the highest mortality rate of cardiovascular diseases globally.
AIM: To compare variations in the parameters of the single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) during resting conditions and physical exertion in individuals diagnosed with IHD and those without the condition using vasodilator-induced stress computed tomography (CT) myocardial perfusion imaging as the diagnostic reference standard.
METHODS: This single center observational study included 80 participants. The participants were aged ≥ 40 years and given an informed written consent to participate in the study. Both groups, G1 (n = 31) with and G2 (n = 49) without post stress induced myocardial perfusion defect, passed cardiologist consultation, anthropometric measurements, blood pressure and pulse rate measurement, echocardiography, cardio-ankle vascular index, bicycle ergometry, recording 3-min single-lead ECG (Cardio-Qvark) before and just after bicycle ergometry followed by performing CT myocardial perfusion. The LASSO regression with nested cross-validation was used to find the association between Cardio-Qvark parameters and the existence of the perfusion defect. Statistical processing was performed with the R programming language v4.2, Python v.3.10 [^R], and Statistica 12 program.
RESULTS: Bicycle ergometry yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 50.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.388-0.625], specificity of 53.1% (95%CI: 0.392-0.673), and sensitivity of 48.4% (95%CI: 0.306-0.657). In contrast, the Cardio-Qvark test performed notably better with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 67% (95%CI: 0.530-0.801), specificity of 75.5% (95%CI: 0.628-0.88), and sensitivity of 51.6% (95%CI: 0.333-0.695).
CONCLUSION: The single-lead ECG has a relatively higher diagnostic accuracy compared with bicycle ergometry by using machine learning models, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, further investigations are required to uncover the hidden capabilities of single-lead ECG in IHD diagnosis.
AIM: To compare variations in the parameters of the single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) during resting conditions and physical exertion in individuals diagnosed with IHD and those without the condition using vasodilator-induced stress computed tomography (CT) myocardial perfusion imaging as the diagnostic reference standard.
METHODS: This single center observational study included 80 participants. The participants were aged ≥ 40 years and given an informed written consent to participate in the study. Both groups, G1 (n = 31) with and G2 (n = 49) without post stress induced myocardial perfusion defect, passed cardiologist consultation, anthropometric measurements, blood pressure and pulse rate measurement, echocardiography, cardio-ankle vascular index, bicycle ergometry, recording 3-min single-lead ECG (Cardio-Qvark) before and just after bicycle ergometry followed by performing CT myocardial perfusion. The LASSO regression with nested cross-validation was used to find the association between Cardio-Qvark parameters and the existence of the perfusion defect. Statistical processing was performed with the R programming language v4.2, Python v.3.10 [^R], and Statistica 12 program.
RESULTS: Bicycle ergometry yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 50.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.388-0.625], specificity of 53.1% (95%CI: 0.392-0.673), and sensitivity of 48.4% (95%CI: 0.306-0.657). In contrast, the Cardio-Qvark test performed notably better with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 67% (95%CI: 0.530-0.801), specificity of 75.5% (95%CI: 0.628-0.88), and sensitivity of 51.6% (95%CI: 0.333-0.695).
CONCLUSION: The single-lead ECG has a relatively higher diagnostic accuracy compared with bicycle ergometry by using machine learning models, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, further investigations are required to uncover the hidden capabilities of single-lead ECG in IHD diagnosis.