MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.11.005

Медицинская библиотека · Preventive medicine · 2009

Follow-up for cervical abnormalities in a managed care plan, 1999-2004.

Benard V B, Berkman N D, Kuo T, Martin C K, Richardson L C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the follow-up for women after receiving an abnormal Pap test before and after the updated American Society of Colposcopic and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) guidelines for management of abnormal cytology.

METHODS

In 1999 and 2004, women who had been enrolled in a US health care plan for at least 21 months and were between 18 and 70 years of age were included. We calculated differences in type of follow-up between the time periods before and after ASCCP guideline changes in 2002.

RESULTS

Overall, 1.7 million women met study criteria and received at least one Pap test. Overall, 227,802 (14%) women received additional follow-up. Of these women, 73% had a repeat Pap test within 9 months as their first follow-up, 13% received colposcopy, and 7% had other events. The proportion of women receiving a repeat Pap test decreased significantly during the post-guideline time period. The odds of a woman receiving a colposcopy versus a repeat Pap test were 41% higher in the post-guideline period, after controlling for other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that for the time period after the ASCCP guidelines changed, more colposcopies and fewer repeat Pap tests were performed as a follow-up of abnormal Pap test.

Для цитирования: Benard V B, Berkman N D, Kuo T, Martin C K, Richardson L C. Follow-up for cervical abnormalities in a managed care plan, 1999-2004.. Preventive medicine. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.11.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.