Medicina clinica · 2009
[Effectiveness of lumbar sympathectomy in the treatment of occlusive peripheral vascular disease in lower limbs: systematic review].
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ruiz-Aragón Jesús, Márquez Calderón Soledad
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work has been to check the scientific evidence on the efficacy of lumbar sympathectomy in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease of lower limbs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systematic review of the literature.
DATA SOURCE: MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, INHATA, CRD, BioMed Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov register. Mesh terms: sympathectomy, peripheral vascular disease, lower extremity, vascular therapy, iliac artery, femoral artery, popliteal artery.
INCLUSION CRITERIA: adult patients with occlusive peripheral arterial disease of lower limbs treated with sympathectomy. The quality was evaluated by means of the criteria of the CASP checklist and "ad hoc" questionnaire.
RESULTS: Four clinical trials and four observational studies were included. Sympathectomy did not show significant differences for mortality, amputations and grade of intermittent claudication. When it was assessed regarding local anaesthetics or prostaglandin-E1, differences were not detected. Chemical sympathectomy showed better results than surgical sympathectomy in hospital stance.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the efficacy of sympathectomy does not show differences related to conventional treatments. Both sympathectomy techniques (surgical and chemical) do not report statistical differences regarding mortality or amputations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systematic review of the literature.
DATA SOURCE: MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, INHATA, CRD, BioMed Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov register. Mesh terms: sympathectomy, peripheral vascular disease, lower extremity, vascular therapy, iliac artery, femoral artery, popliteal artery.
INCLUSION CRITERIA: adult patients with occlusive peripheral arterial disease of lower limbs treated with sympathectomy. The quality was evaluated by means of the criteria of the CASP checklist and "ad hoc" questionnaire.
RESULTS: Four clinical trials and four observational studies were included. Sympathectomy did not show significant differences for mortality, amputations and grade of intermittent claudication. When it was assessed regarding local anaesthetics or prostaglandin-E1, differences were not detected. Chemical sympathectomy showed better results than surgical sympathectomy in hospital stance.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the efficacy of sympathectomy does not show differences related to conventional treatments. Both sympathectomy techniques (surgical and chemical) do not report statistical differences regarding mortality or amputations.