Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association · 2022
Detecting side-to-side differences of lower limb biomechanics during single-legged forward landing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Asaeda Makoto, Nakamae Atsuo, Mikami Yukio, Hirata Kazuhiko, Kono Yoshifumi, Abe Takumi, Deie Masataka, Adachi Nobuo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Motion analysis can be used to evaluate functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; however, the biomechanics parameters of the lower limb that are specifically altered in ACL-reconstructed knees compared to the contralateral side are not well understood. This retrospective study aimed to compare side-to-side differences in lower limb biomechanics during the first 100 milliseconds (ms) after initial contact in a single-leg forward landing task.
METHODS: Using three-dimensional motion analysis, lower joint kinematic and kinetic variables were measured 8-10 months postoperatively in 22 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction. We determined side-to-side differences in lower limb biomechanics over the 100-ms timeframe after landing, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for parameters showing significant side-to-side differences.
RESULTS: During the 100-ms timeframe after landing, 58 kinematic and kinetic items showed significant side-to-side differences. Side-to-side differences in lower limb biomechanics over the 40-ms timeframe after landing existed. The ROC curve analysis identified 11 items with AUC values ≥ 0.70, including hip flexion, abduction moment, and knee joint power, and their AUC values were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Hip flexion/abduction moment and knee power after GRF max could be used as outcomes for assessing functional recovery in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: Using three-dimensional motion analysis, lower joint kinematic and kinetic variables were measured 8-10 months postoperatively in 22 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction. We determined side-to-side differences in lower limb biomechanics over the 100-ms timeframe after landing, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for parameters showing significant side-to-side differences.
RESULTS: During the 100-ms timeframe after landing, 58 kinematic and kinetic items showed significant side-to-side differences. Side-to-side differences in lower limb biomechanics over the 40-ms timeframe after landing existed. The ROC curve analysis identified 11 items with AUC values ≥ 0.70, including hip flexion, abduction moment, and knee joint power, and their AUC values were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Hip flexion/abduction moment and knee power after GRF max could be used as outcomes for assessing functional recovery in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction.