Sage open pediatrics · 2025
Comparative Evaluation of 3 Neonatal Simulators for Neonatal Resuscitation and Airway Obstruction Skills in Medical Students.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Manjavidze Irma, Otiashvili Lia, Chitaishvili Dali, Nozadze Pirdara
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of 3 neonatal simulators in training medical students in resuscitation skills.
INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training is a critical component of neonatal resuscitation education. However, few studies have compared the educational value of different neonatal simulators.
METHODS: Sixty-eight fourth-year medical students participated in a Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation session using the Brayden Baby, Prestan Professional, and Baby Anne simulators. Following hands-on practice, students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating each simulator. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests.
RESULTS: Brayden Baby was significantly preferred in 7 out of 9 categories, including ease of positioning, ventilation, mask placement, and overall realism (P < .05). Baby Anne was rated highest for realism in foreign body removal.
CONCLUSION: Brayden Baby emerged as the most effective simulator, indicating its greater suitability for neonatal training. Careful simulator selection may enhance learning outcomes in neonatal resuscitation education.
INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training is a critical component of neonatal resuscitation education. However, few studies have compared the educational value of different neonatal simulators.
METHODS: Sixty-eight fourth-year medical students participated in a Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation session using the Brayden Baby, Prestan Professional, and Baby Anne simulators. Following hands-on practice, students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating each simulator. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests.
RESULTS: Brayden Baby was significantly preferred in 7 out of 9 categories, including ease of positioning, ventilation, mask placement, and overall realism (P < .05). Baby Anne was rated highest for realism in foreign body removal.
CONCLUSION: Brayden Baby emerged as the most effective simulator, indicating its greater suitability for neonatal training. Careful simulator selection may enhance learning outcomes in neonatal resuscitation education.