1. Introduction
Holmes Tremor (HT) was first described by Gordon Holmes in 1904 [ 1 , 2 ], and is currently defined as a resting, postural, and intention tremor that usually results from the contraction of both proximal and distal muscles, occurring at a frequency of less than 5 Hz [ 3 ]. Historically, HT has been known by other names, including rubral, thalamic and midbrain tremor, but the continuous observation of this phenomenon soon demonstrated that a lesion in these structures was not strictly necessary [ 1 ].
It is our understanding today that, from a pathophysiological point of view, HT usually manifests a few months after the onset of a lesions in both the nigrostriatal, cerebellothalamic-cortical, and dentate-rubro-thalamic pathways [ 4 ]. Etiologically, HT is most associated with vascular or traumatic lesions, but many other causes have been described [ 1 ].
The treatment of HT remains challenging even in specialized services, and inadequate symptom control can lead to a significant loss of functionality for affected patients [ 1 ]. Given the rarity of the condition, current evidence is primarily derived from case reports, case series and expert opinions; therefore, it is essential to systematically structure and organize the data collected to build a robust body of knowledge about HT.
2. Methodology
A review of the literature was carried out using articles indexed in the Pubmed database. A search was performed with the keywords “Holmes tremor” and “Rubral tremor”, including studies written in English on case reports, case series, case-control and clinical trials, without any period filter. Review and meta-analysis studies were excluded either through platform filters or manually. In the case of “Rubral tremor” search, an additional filter was applied to select only articles that include the keyword in its title.
The studies were first analyzed based on their abstract and subsequently reviewed in full. We included articles that defined Holmes Tremor based on Holmes’ original description [ 2 ], or Movement Disorders Society’s diagnosis criteria, published in 1998 [ 5 ] and again in 2018 [ 3 ]. Articles suggesting alternative diagnoses or involved with comorbidities that could potentially interfere with the treatment response were excluded. Articles that did not address the treatment or did not have sufficient data on individual responses to the established therapeutic strategies were also excluded.
The articles were organized into a table for categorization according to the treatment modality (pharmacological or surgical) with results classified as positive (complete or partial) and negative (absent or minimal). The drugs used were listed along their outcomes, and when formal quantifications by means of scales were available, they were also recorded. In the case of surgical treatment, the modality and surgical target were described.
3. Results
From the search with the established keyword, 295 articles published from 1927 to 2025 were found. Article selection process detailed in Figure 1 led to the exclusion of 198 articles. The remaining 97 publications consist of reports and case series, accounting for 121 cases.

Among the cases reviewed, 15 did not respond to treatment [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ] and, in one case, treatment was deemed unnecessary due to the absence of any impact on patient’s quality of life [ 6 ]. Of the remaining cases, 42 showed positive results with pharmacological therapies either as mono or polytherapy [ 6 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ] and another 41 with surgical therapies [ 6 , 7 , 39 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Furthermore, 14 cases responded to treatment of the underlying disease leading to HT [ 46 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ] while 5 cases achieved positive outcomes through combined treatment of the underlying disease with an additional therapy (drug or surgical) [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 ]. There are also four reports of transient HT [ 100 , 101 , 102 ] and one with improvement following acupuncture [ 44 ]. One case presented a satisfactory response to drug therapy, but due to adverse effects of the medication, a subsequent surgical intervention was performed. For the purpose of assessing the response to treatment, the case was included in both therapeutic categories [ 39 ].
HT reversed by treatment of the underlying disease, included: pineal hamartoma [ 90 ], secondary to antipsychotic use [ 83 ], paraneoplasm [ 84 ], cavernoma [ 87 , 88 , 89 ], germinoma [ 86 ], nonketotic hyperglycemia [ 92 ], arachnoid cyst [ 46 , 94 ], multiple myeloma [ 96 ]aneurysm [ 85 ], neuroinfection [ 97 , 99 ], tumefactive perivascular space [ 82 ], CSF hypotension [ 91 ] and hydrocephalus [ 98 ].
3.1. Pharmacological treatment
3.1.1. Levodopa
Levodopa was the most used therapy in all the studies analyzed, being described in 67 cases [ 6 , 7 , 9 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 28 , 29 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 47 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 64 , 66 , 67 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 80 , 89 , 93 , 95 , 96 , 98 , 101 ]. Twenty-one patients (31.34%) showed partial or satisfactory improvement [ 6 , 22 , 23 , 28 , 29 , 33 , 35 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 47 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 98 ]. The minimum daily dose was 150 mg and the maximum was 1500 mg, with a median of 600 mg. Only two studies evaluated the response by rating scales. The magnitude of response, measured by UPDRS-III were 57% and 70% [ 33 , 39 ].
Regarding positive outcomes, multiple drugs were required in 7 [ 23 , 29 , 33 , 47 , 98 ] of the 21 cases, with dopamine agonists being the main combination with 4 reports, followed by levetiracetam and isoniazid, both with one; one article reported positive results with the combination of levodopa, pramipexol and zonisamide. In these cases, some authors highlight the preferential effectiveness of levodopa for the resting component of HT [ 23 , 33 ]. Additionally, there are notable records of improvement with single doses of the medication [ 50 , 53 ]. As for the 46 negative outcome cases, only 37 developed to successful treatments, 22 of which were surgery referrals.
3.1.2. Dopaminergic agonists
Eleven dopamine agonists cases were analyzed [ 21 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 32 , 33 , 45 , 47 , 67 , 99 ]. Ten had positive outcomes, being 5 with pramipexole [ 27 , 29 , 33 , 45 , 99 ], 3 with piribedil [ 32 , 47 ] and 3 isolated reports with ropinirole [ 21 ], bromocriptine [ 47 ] and cabergoline [ 25 ]. Bromocriptine prescription was ineffective in two cases [ 24 , 67 ]. The daily doses of pramipexole ranged between 1.08 and 2.8 mg, while those of piribedil ranged between 120 and 300 mg [ 27 , 29 , 32 , 33 , 45 , 47 , 99 ].
Of the 10 reports with positive responses, only 4 occurred with the isolated use of dopamine agonists, whereas, 5 had to combine levodopa to achieve satisfactory results [ 29 , 33 , 47 ] and one combined pramipexole, levodopa and zonisamide. Some reports show positive outcomes even in the absence of response to levodopa [ 21 , 25 , 32 ], and one report described a successful treatment with ropinirole in an absent response to pramipexole [ 21 ]. The case report in which dopamine agonist didn’t show any benefit was referred to surgery [ 67 ].
3.1.3. Primidone
The use of primidone has been reported in 13 cases [ 6 , 7 , 14 , 34 , 56 , 59 , 60 , 70 , 71 , 96 , 101 ], with only one case of partial improvement at the daily dose of 250 mg [ 6 ]. Among the cases with negative outcomes, one showed improvement with isoniazid [ 34 ], another exhibited spontaneous improvement [ 101 ], 4 underwent surgical treatment [ 56 , 59 , 60 , 70 , 71 , 96 ] and the remaining cases showed no response.
3.1.4. Beta blockers
A total of 17 cases reported the use of beta blockers [ 7 , 13 , 14 , 17 , 26 , 36 , 37 , 56 , 58 , 59 , 70 , 71 , 73 , 75 , 77 , 79 , 96 ], of which 14 involved propranolol. None of them achieved a satisfactory response; ten proceeded to surgical therapy [ 56 , 58 , 59 , 70 , 71 , 73 , 75 , 77 , 79 , 96 ] and 3 responded to other treatments [ 26 , 36 , 37 ].
3.1.5. Anticholinergics
Anticholinergics were the second most frequently used drug class in the studies reviewed, being described in 24 cases [ 13 , 14 , 17 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 37 , 48 , 51 , 52 , 64 , 66 , 70 , 77 , 78 , 78 , 80 , 93 , 95 , 97 ]. Of these, 7 (29.16%) demonstrated positive results [ 22 , 24 , 30 , 37 , 48 , 51 , 97 ], with only 4 cases utilizing anticholinergic monotherapy [ 24 , 37 , 48 , 51 ]. Two of the seven warrant special consideration: one had associated mild dystonic features [ 30 ]; while the other received concurrent treatment for a neuroinfection causing HT [ 97 ]. Among the cases with negative results, 9 underwent surgical and four responded to other medication treatment [ 64 , 66 , 70 , 77 , 78 , 78 , 80 , 95 ].
The most successful drug was trihexiphenidyl, with a daily doses ranging from 6 to 38 mg [ 30 , 48 , 51 , 97 ], with a median of 12.5 mg; of the four reports with positive trihexiphenidyl results, one used combined therapy with amantadine and one with clonazepam. Other medications with satisfactory results were benztropine and biperiden [ 22 , 24 , 37 ].
3.1.6. Anti-seizure medication
Anti-seizure drugs showed satisfactory response in only 7 cases, with 22 negative results. Levetiracetam was successful in three [ 26 , 31 , 98 ] out of a total of 14 attempts [ 7 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 26 , 31 , 32 , 38 , 59 , 61 , 61 , 67 , 98 ]; valproic acid in 1 of 5 [ 22 , 38 , 49 , 51 , 73 ], only in combination with benztropine; topiramate in 1 of 6, in monotherapy [ 7 , 38 , 55 , 56 , 70 , 96 ]; and zonisamide in 2 of 6 [ 33 , 42 , 56 , 60 , 60 , 84 ] attempts, one in monotherapy and one in combination with levodopa and pramipexole. Gabapentin had 7 negative attempts [ 6 , 13 , 15 , 38 , 59 , 96 ].
Regarding the use of zonisamide, some authors described that its use in association with dopaminergic drugs was interesting because it had the best effect for the controlling posture and intention tremor within the combinations used [ 6 , 13 , 15 , 38 , 59 , 96 ].
3.1.7. Benzodiazepines
Although they are the second most reported class, with a total of 36 cases [ 7 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 28 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 43 , 44 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 55 , 60 , 66 , 69 , 73 , 75 , 79 , 80 , 84 , 93 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 101 ], benzodiazepines presented positive results only in four cases (11.11%) [ 43 , 44 , 49 , 97 ] with the clonazepam being the most prescribed, in doses of up to 3 mg per day, 3 of which were in monotherapy [ 43 , 44 , 49 ], and one in combination with trixiphenidyl.
3.1.8. Botulinum toxin
Of the five cases reviewed involving the use of botulinum toxin [ 36 , 61 , 73 , 79 ], only one demonstrated improvement as measured by the The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), with a response rate of 37.77% [ 36 ]. In this particular case, the patient failed to respond to levodopa, propranolol and clonazepam; the injections scheme was made with abobotulinotoxin A in the following muscles: 500 IU in the biceps brachii, 250 IU in the triceps brachii and 250 IU in the deltoid [ 36 ].
3.1.9. Other drugs
There are two successful reports with isoniazid in HT patients caused by neurotoxoplasmosis [ 23 , 34 ]. In addition, amantadine in combination with triexiphenidyl produced a positive result in one case [ 30 ].
3.2. Surgical Treatment
3.2.1. Lesion surgery
We identified 8 reports of lesional surgeries for the treatment of HT [ 57 , 58 , 63 , 69 , 73 , 77 , 95 , 96 ], one of which was performed after the removal of the deep brain stimulation electrode due to infection [ 57 ]. Among these, 6 have satisfactory symptom control, with surgical targeting placed either in the internal Pallidus Globe (GPi) [ 69 ] or Ventrous Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus (VIM) [ 57 , 63 , 73 , 95 , 96 ]. Notably, only the GPi lesion patient was evaluated using the Tremor Rating Scale, with a rate of response of 54%.
Of the remaining cases, one showed an unsatisfactory outcome following a unilateral VIM lesion with high-frequency ultrasonography [ 58 ], while another experienced symptoms recurrence after stereotactic VIM lesion with transient symptom improvement [ 77 ].
3.2.2. Neuromodulation
Neuromodulation surgery demonstrated the highest consistency among the treatments evaluated in this review, with positive results reported across all the reports surveyed, including complete improvements measured by rating scales. Among 40 cases surveyed, 25 involved single-target stimulation while 15 utilized multi-target stimulation, as shown in Table 1 .
Table 1
Summary of the cases whose treatment was performed with neuromodulation with deep brain stimulation. The number of patients in each case report or series, gender and age of the patients, laterality of the surgery, scale used for evaluation, and response rate with treatment are described. N number of patients who underwent DBS implantation in each series; M Male; F Female; ND Not described.; GPi: Internal globus pallidus; VIM: Ventral intermediate nucleos of the thalamus; Vo: Ventro-oral nucleous of the thalamus; Voa: Ventro-oral anterior nucleous of the thalamus; Vop: Ventro-oral posterior nucleous of the thalamus; ZI: Zona incerta; PSA: Posterior subthalamic area; DRTT: Dentato rubro thalamic tract; RaPrl: Prelemniscal radiations; TETRAS: The Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Scale.
| N | SEX | AGE | LATERALITY | TARGET | SCALE | RATE OF IMPROVEMENT | |
| Del Gaudio N, et al [ 6 ] | 1 | M | 18 | Unilateral | VIM+GPi | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 67% |
| Rosa TD, et al [ 56 ] | 1 | M | 58 | Bilateral | VIM+PSA | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 29,26% |
| Razmkon A, et al [ 57 ] | 1 | M | 37 | Unilateral | VIM | ||
| O’Shea SA, et al [ 39 ] | 1 | F | 62 | Unilateral | VIM+ZI | UPDRS III | 33,33% |
| Brittain JS, et al [ 72 ] | 1 | ND | 36 | Unilateral | Vop+ZI | Bain Rating Scale | Rest 89%Postural 90% Intention 32% |
| Yousefi O, et al [ 81 ] | 1 | M | 57 | Unilateral | PSA | ||
| Maesawa S, et al [ 58 ] | 1 | F | 77 | Unilateral | VIM+RaPrlVa+ZI | Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor | 34,78% |
| Ghanchi H, et al [ 59 ] | 1 | M | 66 | Unilateral | VIM | TETRAS | 75% |
| Kamo H, et al [ 60 ] | 2 | M | 18 | Unilateral | PSA | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 56,45% |
| M | 52 | Bilateral | PSA | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 33,92% | ||
| Bargiotas P, et al [ 61 ] | 4 | F | 62 | Unilateral | VIM | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 4,50% |
| M | 71 | Unilateral | DRTT | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 7,90% | ||
| F | 28 | Unilateral | DRTT | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 22,70% | ||
| M | 46 | Unilateral | VIM | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 33,30% | ||
| Onder H, et al [ 55 ] | 1 | M | 58 | Unilateral | VIM | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 73% |
| Kobayashi K, et al [ 62 ] | 4 | F | 19 | Unilateral | VIM+PSA | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 100% |
| M | 67 | Unilateral | VIM+PSA | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 100% | ||
| M | 44 | Unilateral | VIM+PSA | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 95% | ||
| M | 18 | Unilateral | VIM+PSA | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 93% | ||
| Kilbane C, et al [ 74 ] | 4 | M | 43 | Unilateral | VIM+Voa+GPi | ||
| M | 65 | Unilateral | GPi | ||||
| M | 29 | Unilateral | VIM+GPi | ||||
| M | 50 | Unilateral | GPi | ||||
| Chong Z, et al [ 64 ] | 1 | M | 53 | Unilateral | VIM+PSA | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 62,50% |
| Toda H, et al [ 75 ] | 1 | M | 16 | Unilateral | Vo+PSA | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 71,73% |
| Peker S, et al [ 65 ] | 1 | F | 11 | Unilateral | VIM | ||
| Castrop F, et al [ 78 ] | 2 | ND | 43 | Unilateral | VIM | ||
| ND | 40 | Unilateral | VIM | ||||
| Aquino CC, et al [ 96 ] | 1 | M | 66 | Unilateral | VIM | ||
| Grabska N, et al [ 66 ] | 1 | F | 45 | Unilateral | Vo+ZI | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 73,80% |
| Acar G, et al [ 67 ] | 1 | M | 31 | Bilateral | VIM | ||
| Plaha P, et al [ 54 ] | 1 | M | 84 | Bilateral | ZI | Fahn Tolosa Marin | 70,20% |
| Romanelli P, et al [ 71 ] | 1 | M | 79 | Unilateral | VIM | ||
| Hertel F, et al [ 68 ] | 1 | M | 58 | Unilateral | VIM | ||
| Foote KD, et al [ 76 ] | 1 | M | 24 | Unilateral | VIM Voa+Vop | Tremor Rating Scale | 39,62% |
| Nikkhah G, et al [ 79 ] | 2 | F | 47 | Unilateral | VIM | ||
| F | 37 | Unilateral | VIM | ||||
| Kudo M, et al [ 80 ] | 1 | F | 67 | Bilateral | VIM | ||
| Goto S, et al [ 69 ] | 1 | M | 53 | Unilateral | VIM | Tremor Rating Scale | 45,45% |
| Sanborn MR, et al [ 70 ] | 1 | M | 31 | Unilateral | VIM | ||
Some noteworthy observations were reported: of improvement were documented in two cases even after device shutdown, and bilateral surgeries were suggested to provide additional improvement even in a case of unilateral symptoms as reported by Kudo et al [ 80 ].
4. Discussion
This review includes a considerable number of HT cases, bringing a new perspective on its treatment. By analyzing the enrolled studies, we can estimate the rate of success of different treatments, which will eventually help in therapeutic decision-making and guide future research on HT.
However, this is not the first attempt to summarize HT treatment strategies. Wang et al. [ 103 ] published a systematic review containing quantitative tremor response rates to different treatments, and by analyzing the effects of individual drugs, they were unable to determine any superiority, but they also had a limited sample size. Interestingly, they reported levetiracetam as a promising drug for tremor control [ 103 ], but our data suggest it can be useful only in a few cases, since levodopa, trihexyphenidyl, and even dopaminergic agonists have shown better response rates. When it comes to surgical intervention, there are better symptomatic control with neuromodulation as compared to pharmacological treatment alone [ 103 ]. Even though our study was not designed to compare the efficacy of treatments, the response rate of HT to neuromodulation was indeed remarkable, making it a viable option for HT patients refractory to medication.
Success rates are not widely discussed in current medical literature, possibly due to both the scarce number of HT cases and the limited access to large cohorts. Accordingly, current treatment is based on case reports findings. Nonetheless, Raina et al. [ 4 ] published an impressive case series with 29 patients and a 54.16% success rate with levodopa treatment, and a similar median daily dosage as reported in our study. Formal quantitative measurements were not performed by their team, but they reported almost complete tremor control with levodopa use in half of the responsive patients [ 4 ]. As for other pharmacological agents, a limited number of successful cases were described with botulinum toxin, but no satisfactory results were described with trihexyphenidyl, levetiracetam, clonazepam, propranolol, or other antiepileptic drugs [ 4 ]. Given that our review is based on published clinical cases, it is possible that the benefits of levodopa are overestimated, as patients who did not respond to the proposed treatment are less likely to be subjects of scientific publication. For the same reason, it may also overestimate the success rates of other treatments, both pharmacological and surgical, and the actual rate of success could be lower.
Based on the gathered data, we propose levodopa, trihexyphenidyl and dopamine agonists as first line medication for HT treatment, having the combination of levodopa and dopamine agonists as a reasonable combination in refractory cases. Surgical interventions are not yet investigated as first line options, but, as it seems to be the most successful strategy, caregivers should not delay referral in medication resistant HT. The summarized strategies for HT treatment based on our findings can be seen in Figure 2 .

Our study brings a new perspective to the treatment of HT, as it estimates which medications may be more consistent for HT patients. Because HT is rare, little systematized information is available, and we believe our review is a crucial step in HT research and in clinical practice. For the future, we propose systematizing HT cases and series reports, including failed treatment attempts, medication dosages, and quantitative assessments of HT severity before and after each attempt; additionally, description of associated phenomena, such as dystonia, parkinsonism and ataxia, should be reported and measured as well. Additionally, HT literature itself is dubious as its diagnosis is clinical and eventually other entities could mimic it for untrained professionals, specially due to the rarity of this kind of tremor; the lack of tools to objectively evaluate HT in particular also play a role in the practical difficulties in its assessment Of course, our study has other limitations, mainly associated with publication bias and incomplete information in published papers, but it sheds light on the current HT approach since there is an absence of clinical trials. Large case series represent a viable approach to building knowledge regarding the true response to treatments, as the greater the number of patients treated, the higher the likelihood of observing both positive and negative outcomes within the same sample.
The present review indicates that the drug treatments with the highest response rate are levodopa, anticholinergic drugs and dopamine agonists. From a surgical point of view, neuromodulation with DBS implantation has positive results, regardless of the target selected among those described. However, being a review based on reports and case series, larger conclusions cannot be made reliably due to bias; the heterogeneity of the data in the reports and in the treatments instituted, as well as the application of different scales are some of the impediments to detailed analysis. This review should, therefore, not be seen as a definite guideline on HT treatment, but as a first attempt to organize and synthetize the current landscape on this topic, as well as to offer guidance to future research.
Our survey highlights the clear need for standardizing the reporting of HT cases. Due to the rarity of this phenomenon, only detailed descriptions will contribute to the development of robust knowledge on the subject.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in the submitted article are our own and not an official position of the institution.
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
References
1. Hey G, Hu W, Wong J, Tsuboi T, Burns MR, Ramirez-Zamora A. Evolving Concepts in Our Understanding and Treatment of Holmes Tremor, Over 100 Years in the Making. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2022. May;12(1):18. DOI: 10.5334/tohm.683
2. Holmes G. On Certain Tremors In Organic Cerebral Lesions. Brain. 1904;27(3):327–75. DOI: 10.1093/brain/27.3.327
3. Bhatia KP, Bain P, Bajaj N, Elble RJ, Hallett M, Louis ED, et al. Consensus Statement on the classification of tremors. from the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Movement Disorders. 2018. Jan;33(1):75–87. DOI: 10.1002/mds.27121
4. Raina GB, Cersosimo MG, Folgar SS, Giugni JC, Calandra C, Paviolo JP, et al. Holmes tremor: Clinical description, lesion localization, and treatment in a series of 29 cases. Neurology. 2016. Mar;86(10): 931–8. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002440
5. Deuschl G, Bain P, Brin M. Consensus Statement of the Movement Disorder Society on Tremor. Mov Disord. 1998. Oct;13(S3):2–23. DOI: 10.1002/mds.870131303
6. Del Gaudio N, Vaz G, Duprez T, Raftopoulos C. Holmes tremor in a monocentric series of resected brainstem cavernomas. Neurochirurgie. 2021. Jul;67(4):315–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.03.001
7. Magistrelli L, Vecchio D, Naldi P, Comi C, Cantello R. Holmes tremor caused by a natalizumab-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a case report and brief review of the literature. Neurol Sci. 2019. Sep;40(9):1943–5. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-019-03779-6
8. Budhram A, Simpson HD, Bower JH, Hassan A, Conway BL, Flanagan EP. Holmes Tremor With Perirolandic Demyelinating Lesions: A Distinct Clinicoradiographic Syndrome. Neurology. 2021. Feb;96(5):231–2. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011235
9. Pandey S. Holmes’ Tremor Secondary to Cerebellopontine Angle Epidermoid Cyst. The Neurologist. 2017. Jul;22(4):141–3. DOI: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000131
10. Gunness VN, Dooms G, Wauschkuhn B, Feiden W, Hertel F. Holmes tremor in a patient with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5(9):413. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.140205
11. He JM, He J, Lin HX, Wang N, Lin Y. Holmes tremor with impairment of the Guillain-Mollaret triangle following medullar hemorrhage. Neurol Sci. 2018. Jul;39(7):1305–6. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-018-3289-2
12. D’Amico MC, Borrelli I, Zhuzhuni H, D’Amico A, Di Giacomo R, Mancinelli L, et al. Holmes-Like Tremor in Ataxia With Oculomotor Apraxia Type 2. Movement Disord Clin Pract. 2014. Sep;1(3):261–2. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12070
13. Kim MK, Cho BM, Park SH, Yoon DY. Holmes’ Tremor Associated with Bilateral Hypertrophic Olivary Degeneration Following Brain Stem Hemorrhage: A Case Report. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2014;16(3):299. DOI: 10.7461/jcen.2014.16.3.299
14. Emekli AS, Samanci B, Şimşir G, Hanagasi HA, Gürvit H, Bilgiç B, et al. A novel PNPLA6 mutation in a Turkish family with intractable Holmes tremor and spastic ataxia. Neurol Sci. 2021. Apr;42(4):1535–9. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04869-6
15. Kipfer S, Frigerio SB. Post-ischemic stroke Holmes’ tremor of the upper limb. Movement Disorders. 2013. Sep;28(10):1347–1347. DOI: 10.1002/mds.25621
16. Wei TS, Hsu CS, Lee YC, Chang ST. Degeneration of paramedian nuclei in the thalamus induces Holmes tremor in a case of artery of Percheron infarction. Medicine. 2017. Nov;96(46):e8633. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008633
17. Leung GKK, Fan YW, Ho SL. Rubral tremor associated with cavernous angioma of the midbrain. Mov Disord. 1999. Jan;14(1):191–3. DOI: 10.1002/1531-8257(199901)14:1>191::AID-MDS1043<3.0.CO;2-Y
18. Martins WA, Marrone LCP, Fussiger H, Vedana VM, Cristovam RDA, Taietti MZ, et al. Holmes’ tremor as a delayed complication of thalamic stroke. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2016. Apr;26:158–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.09.014
19. Simonetti F, Pergami P, Marinu Aktipi K, Giardini G, Ceroni M, Lattuada P, et al. Paraneoplastic “rubral” tremor: A case report. Movement Disorders. 1998. May;13(3):612–4. DOI: 10.1002/mds.870130345
20. Yerdelen D, Karatas M, Goksel B, Yildirim T. A patient with multiple sclerosis presenting with Holmes’ tremor. Euro J of Neurology [Internet]. 2008. Jan;15(1). DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01984.x
21. Rutchik J, Bowler RM, Ratner MH. A rare case of Holmes tremor in a worker with occupational carbon monoxide poisoning. American J Industrial Med. 2021. May;64(5):435–49. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23235
22. Tan H, Turanli G, Ay H, Saatçi I. Rubral tremor after thalamic infarction in childhood. Pediatric Neurology. 2001. Nov;25(5):409–12. DOI: 10.1016/S0887-8994(01)00331-9
23. Pezzini A, Zavarise P, Palvarini L, Viale P, Oladeji O, Padovani A. Holmes’ tremor following midbrain Toxoplasma abscess: clinical features and treatment of a case. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2002. Jan;8(3):177–80. DOI: 10.1016/S1353-8020(01)00013-X
24. Friedman JH. “Rubral” tremor induced by a neuroleptic drug. Movement Disorders. 1992. Jan;7(3):281–2. DOI: 10.1002/mds.870070315
25. Akkus DE, Diramali AB. Postischemic delayed Holmes’ tremor responding to low-dose cabergoline. Mov Disord. 2006. May;21(5):733–4. DOI: 10.1002/mds.20862
26. Striano P, Elefante A, Coppola A, Tortora F, Zara F, Minetti C, Striano S. Dramatic response to levetiracetam in post-ischaemic Holmes’ tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007. Apr;78(4):438–9. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.103275
27. Strecker K, Schneider JP, Sabri O, Wegner F, Then Bergh F, Schwarz J, et al. Responsiveness to a dopamine agent in Holmes tremor – case report. Euro J of Neurology [Internet]. 2007. Apr;14(4). DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01665.x
28. Raina GB, Velez M, Pardal MF, Micheli F. Holmes Tremor Secondary to Brainstem Hemorrhage Responsive to Levodopa: Report of 2 Cases. Clinical Neuropharmacology. 2007. Mar;30(2):95–100. DOI: 10.1097/01.wnf.0000240957.56939.e6
29. Seidel S, Kasprian G, Leutmezer F, Prayer D, Auff E. Disruption of nigrostriatal and cerebellothalamic pathways in dopamine responsive Holmes’ tremor. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2009. Aug;80(8):921–3. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.146324
30. Chiou TSM, Tsai CH, Lee YH. Unilateral Holmes tremor and focal dystonia after Gamma Knife surgery: Case report. JNS. 2006. Dec;105(Supplement):235–7. DOI: 10.3171/sup.2006.105.7.235
31. Ferlazzo E, Morgante F, Rizzo V, Sciarrone G, Meduri M, Magaudda A, et al. Successful treatment of Holmes tremor by levetiracetam. Movement Disorders. 2008. Oct;23(14):2101–3. DOI: 10.1002/mds.22230
32. Baysal L, Acarer A, Celebisoy N. Post-ischemic Holmes’ tremor of the lower extremities. J Neurol. 2009. Dec;256(12):2079–81. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-5273-5
33. Suda S, Yamazaki M, Katsura K, Fukuchi T, Kaneko N, Ueda M, et al. Dramatic response to zonisamide of post-subarachnoid hemorrhage Holmes’ tremor. J Neurol. 2012. Jan;259(1):185–7. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-011-6127-5
34. Koppel BS, Daras M. “Rubral” tremor due to midbrain toxoplasma abscess. Movement Disorders. 1990. Jan;5(3):254–6. DOI: 10.1002/mds.870050314
35. Bolen RD, Balakrishnan N. Palatal myoclonus, eight-and-a-half syndrome, and Holmes tremor in a patient from a single brainstem lesion. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2014. Dec;347(1–2):411–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.10.039
36. Latino P, Pontieri FE, Orzi F, Giovannelli M. Botulinum toxin type A for Holmes tremor secondary to thalamic hemorrhage. Neurol Sci. 2015. Oct;36(10):1935–6. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2285-z
37. Cury RG, Barbosa ER, Freitas C, De Souza Godoy LF, Paiva WS. Holmes Tremor Secondary to a Stabbing Lesion in the Midbrain. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2017. Dec;7(0):523. DOI: 10.5334/tohm.386
38. Rojas NG, Cesarini M, Etcheverry JL, Da Prat G, Aramburu TV, Gatto EM. Holmes Tremor Partially Responsive to Topiramate: A Case Report. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2018. Jun;8(0):565. DOI: 10.5334/tohm.416
39. O’Shea SA, Elkind M, Pullman SL, Ford B. Holmes Tremor due to Artery of Percheron Infarct: Clinical Case and Treatment Using Deep Brain Stimulation of the Vim and ZI Targets. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements [Internet]. 2020. Jan;10(0). DOI: 10.5334/tohm.528
40. Slootjes SM, Lejeune T, Duprez T, Lawson TM, Peeters A. Levodopa-responsive Holmes head titubation caused by midbrain cavernoma hemorrhage. Neurol Sci. 2021. Jan;42(1):381–2. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04627-8
41. Chen X, Zhan L, Ling S, Zheng C, Lu G. Holmes tremor and palatal tremor in hypertrophic olivary degeneration: involvement of brainstem. Neurol Sci. 2021. Mar;42(3):1157–9. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04687-w
42. Shimada T, Uchida W, Shindo A, Kamagata K, Hattori N, Tsunemi T. Delayed-onset motor aphasia succeeds Holmes’ tremor and neuropathic pain after left thalamic hemorrhage. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2021. Apr;423:117367. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117367
43. Zhao H, Shi M, Yang F, Yang D, Hou X, Yang X. Damage to the central nucleus of the thalamus via atypical Holmes tremor: a case report. J Int Med Res. 2021. Apr;49(4):0300060521999567. DOI: 10.1177/0300060521999567
44. Ling YT, Li JM, Ling Y, Wang SG, Wang JT, Zhang XY, et al. Wernekinck Commissure Syndrome with Holmes Tremor: A Report of Two Cases and Review of Literature. Neurology India. 2022. Jan;70(1):281–4. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.338697
45. Yen K, Yaworski A, Bussiere M, Ba F. Pearls & Oy-sters: A Case Report of Holmes Tremor Due to Nigrostriatal Dopamine Disruption That Responded to Dopamine Replacement Therapy. Neurology. 2022. Sep;99(11):480–3. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201000
46. Aubignat M, Tir M, Vandici O, Lefranc M. Successful Surgical Treatment of an Intracranial Arachnoid Cyst Inducing Holmes’ Tremor. Movement Disord Clin Pract. 2023. Jun;10(6):998–1000. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13744
47. Remy P, De Recondo A, Defer G, Loc’h C, Amarenco P, Plante-Bordeneuve V, et al. Peduncular “Rubral” Tremor and Dopaminergic Denervation: A PET Study. Neurology. 1995. Mar;45(3):472–7. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.45.3.472
48. Krack P, Deuschl G, Kaps M, Warnke P, Schneider S, Traupe H. Delayed onset of “rubral tremor” 23 years after brainstem trauma. Movement Disorders. 1994. Jan;9(2):240–2. DOI: 10.1002/mds.870090225
49. Jacob PC, Pratap Chand R. Posttraumatic rubral tremor responsive to clonazepam. Movement Disorders. 1998. Nov;13(6):977–8. DOI: 10.1002/mds.870130622
50. Vélez M, Cosentino C, Torres L. Levodopa-responsive rubral (Holmes’) tremor. Movement Disorders. 2002. Jul;17(4):741–2. DOI: 10.1002/mds.10224
51. Liou L, Shih P. Successful Treatment of Rubral Tremor by High-Dose Trihexyphenidyl: A Case Report. The Kaohsiung J of Med Scie. 2006. Mar;22(3):149–53. DOI: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70235-9
52. Boelmans K, Gerloff C, Münchau A. Long-lasting effect of levodopa on holmes’ tremor. Movement Disorders. 2012. Aug;27(9):1097–8. DOI: 10.1002/mds.24005
53. Findley LJ, Gretsy MA. Suppression of “rubral” tremor with levodopa. BMJ. 1980. Oct;281(6247):1043–4. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.281.6247.1043
54. Plaha P, Khan S, Gill SS. Bilateral stimulation of the caudal zona incerta nucleus for tremor control. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2008. May;79(5):504–13. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.112334
55. Onder H, Kocer B, Turan A, Comoglu S. Illustration of the Long-Term Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Thalamic Ventral Intermediate Nucleus in a Patient with Holmes Tremor Secondary to Stroke. Movement Disord Clin Pract. 2023. Jul;10(7):1143–5. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13741
56. Rosa TD, Dixon L, Yousaf MIK, Holiday V, Zemmar A, Neimat J, et al. Progressive Multifocal Encephalopathy Holmes Tremor Successfully Treated with Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2023. Sep;13(1):31. DOI: 10.5334/tohm.781
57. Razmkon A, Yousefi O, Vaidyanathan J. Using Preimplanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes for Rescue Thalamotomy in a Case of Holmes Tremor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2020;98(2):136–41. DOI: 10.1159/000506083
58. Maesawa S, Torii J, Nakatsubo D, Noda H, Mutoh M, Ito Y, et al. A case report: Dual-lead deep brain stimulation of the posterior subthalamic area and the thalamus was effective for Holmes tremor after unsuccessful focused ultrasound thalamotomy. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. Dec;16:1065459. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1065459
59. Ghanchi H, Siddiqi I, Patchana T, Ananda A. Acquired Holmes Tremor in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome Patient Treated with Deep Brain Stimulation. World Neurosurgery. 2020. Sep;141:253–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.099
60. Kamo H, Oyama G, Ito M, Iwamuro H, Umemura A, Hattori N. Deep brain stimulation in posterior subthalamic area for Holmes tremor: Case reports with review of the literature. Front Neurol. 2023. Mar;14:1139477. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1139477
61. Bargiotas P, Nguyen TAK, Bracht T, Mürset M, Nowacki A, Debove I, et al. Long-Term Outcome and Neuroimaging of Deep Brain Stimulation in Holmes Tremor: A Case Series. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2021. Feb;24(2):392–9. DOI: 10.1111/ner.13352
62. Kobayashi K, Katayama Y, Oshima H, Watanabe M, Sumi K, Obuchi T, et al. Multitarget, dual-electrode deep brain stimulation of the thalamus and subthalamic area for treatment of Holmes’ tremor: Clinical article. JNS. 2014. May;120(5):1025–32. DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.JNS12392
63. Oda K, Morishita T, Tanaka H, Kobayashi H, Abe H. Case report: Radiofrequency thalamotomy as palliative care for Holmes tremor in a patient with terminal cancer and cardiac pacemaker. Surgical Neurology International. 2022. Oct;13:484. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_618_2022
64. Chong Z, Yang X, Peng X, Zong Q, Li H, Xiao Y. Vim-PSA Double-Target DBS for the Treatment of Holmes Tremor Secondary to Brainstem Hemorrhage: A Case Report. IMCRJ. 2024. Jul;Volume 17:703–8. DOI: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S469937
65. Peker S, Isik U, Akgun Y, Ozek M. Deep brain stimulation for Holmes’ tremor related to a thalamic abscess. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008. Sep;24(9):1057–62. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-008-0644-2
66. Grabska N, Rudzińska M, Dec-Ćwiek M, Tutaj M, Pietraszko W, Michalski M, et al. Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of Holmes tremor – A long-term case observation. Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska. 2014. Jul;48(4):292–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2014.06.002
67. Acar G, Acar F, Bir LS, Kızılay Z, Çırak B. Vim stimulation in Holmes’ tremor secondary to subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurological Research. 2010. Nov;32(9):992–4. DOI: 10.1179/016164110X12714125204272
68. Hertel F, Züchner M, Decker C, Erken E, Libri S, Schmitt M, et al. Unilateral Holmes tremor, clearly responsive to cerebrospinal fluid release, in a patient with an ischemic midbrain lesion and associated chronic hydrocephalic ventricle enlargement: Case report. JNS. 2006. Mar;104(3):448–51. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.3.448
69. Goto S, Yamada K. Combination of thalamic Vim stimulation and GPi pallidotomy synergistically abolishes Holmes’ tremor. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2004. Aug;75(8):1203–4. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.023077
70. Sanborn MR, Danish SF, Ranalli NJ, Grady MS, Jaggi JL, Baltuch GH. Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Midbrain Tremor Secondary to Cystic Degeneration of the Brainstem. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87(2):128–33. DOI: 10.1159/000207201
71. Romanelli P, Bronté-Stewart H, Courtney T, Heit G. Possible necessity for deep brain stimulation of both the ventralis intermedius and subthalamic nuclei to resolve Holmes tremor: Case report. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2003. Sep;99(3):566–71. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.3.0566
72. Brittain J, Jenkinson N, Holland P, Joundi RA, Green AL, Aziz TZ. Development of Holmes’ tremor following hemi-cerebellar infarction. Movement Disorders. 2011. Aug;26(10):1957–9. DOI: 10.1002/mds.23704
73. Rieder CRM, Rebouças RG, Ferreira MP. Holmes tremor in association with bilateral hypertrophic olivary degeneration and palatal tremor: chronological considerations. Case report. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2003. Jun;61(2B):473–7. DOI: 10.1590/S0004-282X2003000300028
74. Kilbane C, Ramirez-Zamora A, Ryapolova-Webb E, Qasim S, Glass GA, Starr PA, et al. Pallidal stimulation for Holmes tremor: clinical outcomes and single-unit recordings in 4 cases. JNS. 2015. Jun;122(6):1306–14. DOI: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS141098
75. Toda H, Nishida N, Iwasaki K. Coaxial interleaved stimulation of the thalamus and subthalamus for treatment of Holmes tremor. FOC. 2017. Apr;42(videosuppl2):V1. DOI: 10.3171/2017.4.FocusVid.16510
76. Foote KD, Okun MS. Ventralis Intermedius plus Ventralis Oralis Anterior and Posterior Deep Brain Stimulation for Posttraumatic Holmes Tremor: Two Leads May Be Better than One: Technical Note. Operative Neurosurgery. 2005. Apr;56(suppl_4):ONS-E445-ONS-E445. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000157104.87448.78
77. Maki F, Sato S, Watanabe K, Yanagisawa T, Hagiwara Y, Shimizu T, et al. Vim thalamotomy in a patient with Holmes’ tremor and palatal tremor – Pathophysiological considerations. BMC Neurol. 2015. Dec;15(1):26. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-015-0277-5
78. Castrop F, Jochim A, Berends LP, Haslinger B. Sustained suppression of holmes tremor after cessation of thalamic stimulation. Movement Disorders. 2013. Sep;28(10):1456–7. DOI: 10.1002/mds.25398
79. Nikkhah G, Prokop T, Hellwig B, Lücking CH, Ostertag CB. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus ventralis intermedius for Holmes (rubral) tremor and associated dystonia caused by upper brainstem lesions. J Neurosurg. 2004;100. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.6.1079
80. Kudo M, Goto S, Nishikawa S, Hamasaki T, Soyama N, Ushio Y, et al. Bilateral thalamic stimulation for Holmes’ tremor caused by unilateral brainstem lesion. Mov Disord. 2001. Jan;16(1):170–4. DOI: 10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<170::AID-MDS1033>3.0.CO;2-P
81. Yousefi O, Dayyani M, Rezaei R, Kamran H, Razmkon A. Deep brain stimulation of the posterior subthalamic area as an alternative strategy for management of Holmes tremor: A case report and review of the literature. Surgical Neurology International. 2022. Oct;13:489. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_435_2022
82. Lakha A, Thakar S. Giant Tumefactive Perivascular Spaces: An Unusual Cause of Holmes Tremor. World Neurosurgery. 2023. Nov;179:66–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.049
83. Shen YC. Unilateral rubral tremor following treatment with risperidone. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry. 2009. Jan;10(4–2):629–31. DOI: 10.1080/15622970801958349
84. Kiriyama T, Hirano M, Kitauchi T, Saito K, Kataoka H, Ueno S. A case of chemotherapy-responsive paraneoplastic rubral tremor. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2011. Oct;113(8):693–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.04.011
85. Poloni TE, Galli A, Carlos AF, Riva E, Medici V, Davin A, et al. Reversible Holmes Tremor due to Middle Cerebral Artery Giant Aneurysm. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements [Internet]. 2019. Sep;9(0). DOI: 10.5334/tohm.505
86. Strowd RE, Burger P, Holdhoff M, Kleinberg L, Okun MS, Olivi A, et al. Steroid-responsive intracranial germinoma presenting as Holmes’ tremor: Importance of a tissue diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2015. May;22(5):911–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.11.013
87. Zhong J, Li ST, Xu SQ, Wan L. Holmes’ tremor caused by midbrain cavernoma. Chin Med J (Engl). 2007. Nov 20;120(22):2059–61. PMID: 18067799.
88. Inci S, Celik O, Soylemezoglu F, Ozgen T. Thalamomesencephalic ossified cavernoma presenting with Holmes’ tremor. Surgical Neurology. 2007. May;67(5):511–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.06.057
89. Delaunois J, Vaz G, Raftopoulos C. Transsylvian Transuncal Approach for an Anterior Midbrain Cavernous Malformation Resection: A Case Report. Operative Surg. 2018. Mar;14(3):E38–43. DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx116
90. Pomeranz S, Shalit M, Sherman Y. “Rubral” tremor following radiation of a pineal region vascular hamartoma. Acta neurochir. 1990. Mar;103(1–2):79–81. DOI: 10.1007/BF01420197
91. Iyer RS, Wattamwar P, Thomas B. Reversible Holmes’ tremor due to spontaneous intracranial hypotension. BMJ Case Reports. 2017. Jul;bcr-2017-220348. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2017-220348
92. Tan JH, Chan BPL, Wilder-Smith EP, Ong BKC. A unique case of reversible hyperglycemic Holmes’ tremor. Mov Disord. 2006. May;21(5):707–9. DOI: 10.1002/mds.20795
93. Teive HAG, Zanatta A, Germiniani FMB, Almeida SM, Werneck LC. Holmes’ tremor and neuroparacoccidioidomycosis: A case report. Movement Disorders. 2002. Nov;17(6):1392–4. DOI: 10.1002/mds.10277
94. Coumou AD, Van Dijk JMC, De Vries JJ, Leenders KL, Kuijlen JMA. Successful surgical treatment of an arachnoid cyst inducing a Holmes’ tremor. Movement Disorders. 2012. Jul;27(8):964–964. DOI: 10.1002/mds.25039
95. Kim MC, Son BC, Miyagi Y, Kang JK. Vim thalamotomy for Holmes’ tremor secondary to midbrain tumour. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2002. Oct;73(4):453–5. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.73.4.453
96. Aquino CC, Connolly B, Lang AE. Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Associated Leukoencephalopathy Presenting with Holmes Tremor, Ataxia, and Pyramidal Syndrome. Movement Disord Clin Pract. 2018. Jul;5(4):433–5. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12623
97. Lekoubou A, Njouoguep R, Kuate C, Kengne AP. Cerebral toxoplasmosis in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) patients also provides unifying pathophysiologic hypotheses for Holmes tremor. BMC Neurol. 2010. Dec;10(1):37. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-37
98. Chang SJ, Mitchell R, Hukin J, Singhal A. Treatment-responsive Holmes tremor in a child with low-pressure hydrocephalus: video case report and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2022. May;29(5):520–7. DOI: 10.3171/2021.12.PEDS21539
99. Roselli F, Livrea P, Defazio G, Manobianca G, Ardito B, Gentile MA, et al. Holmes’ tremor associated to HSV-1 cerebral pedunculitis: A case report. Movement Disorders. 2007. Jun;22(8):1204–6. DOI: 10.1002/mds.21464
100. Yoon JH, Yong SW, Lee JS. Spontaneous disappearance of Holmes’ tremor in a patient with a midbrain cavernous hemangioma. Neurol Sci. 2015. Nov;36(11):2137–8. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2309-8
101. Restrepo L, Quiroga-Chand A, Tomatore C, Balish M. “Rubral” tremor after cardiac catheterization: report of 2 cases. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(3):427–9.
102. Agarwal K, Biswas R, Kumar V. Wernekink Commissure Syndrome With Bilateral Cerebellar Signs and Holmes Tremor in a Patient With a Preexisting Movement Disorder. Cureus [Internet]. 2023. Mar; DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35674
103. Wang KL, Wong JK, Eisinger RS, Carbunaru S, Smith C, Hu W, et al. Therapeutic Advances in the Treatment of Holmes Tremor: Systematic Review. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2022. Aug;25(6):796–803. DOI: 10.1111/ner.13220