MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10840-026-02250-9

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026

Efficacy and safety of ventricular tachycardia ablation versus antiarrhythmics in ischemic cardiomyopathy: a network meta-analysis.

Pamporis Konstantinos, Tsiachris Dimitrios, Antoniou Christos-Konstantinos, Boveda Serge, Kordalis Athanasios, Vlachos Konstantinos, Jaïs Pierre, Karakasis Paschalis, Botis Michail, Theofilis Panagiotis, Karanikola Aikaterini-Eleftheria, Tsioufis Konstantinos

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined catheter ablation (CA) and class III antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) in secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CA versus AADs (amiodarone, sotalol) in this population.

METHODS

MEDLINE (Pubmed), Scopus, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until October 26, 2025 for RCTs. Double-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Appropriate shock and electrical storm (ES) were the primary efficacy outcomes. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated via random-effects frequentist models. Registered in PROSPERO: CRD42025640326.

RESULTS

Totally, 14 RCTs (13 in main analysis) and 2,237 patients (2,177 in main analysis) were analyzed. CA was superior against AAD in appropriate shocks (RR = 0.68, 95%CI = [0.47,0.99]; p = 0.043). A nonsignificant reduction was found in ES (RR = 0.81, 95%CI = [0.63,1.03]; p = 0.088) and VA recurrence (RR = 0.86, 95%CI = [0.68,1.08]; p = 0.197). CA was superior to AAD in heart failure (HF) exacerbation (RR = 0.76, 95%CI = [0.58,0.99], p = 0.043) and undetected ventricular tachycardia (VT) (RR = 0.27, 95%CI = [0.15,0.46], p < 0.001). No differences were noted regarding any serious adverse event, all-cause or cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular or VA hospitalization. In secondary analyses, CA was superior against amiodarone in serious adverse events (RR = 0.33, 95%CI = [0.15,0.75]). The results remained robust in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

CA was superior in efficacy with comparable safety compared to AAD in reducing appropriate shocks, HF and undetected VT in patients with ICM and an ICD for secondary prevention. No significant differences were found in overall VA recurrences, ES, all-cause or cardiovascular mortality.

Для цитирования: Pamporis Konstantinos, Tsiachris Dimitrios, Antoniou Christos-Konstantinos, Boveda Serge, Kordalis Athanasios, Vlachos Konstantinos, Jaïs Pierre, Karakasis Paschalis, Botis Michail, Theofilis Panagiotis, Karanikola Aikaterini-Eleftheria, Tsioufis Konstantinos. Efficacy and safety of ventricular tachycardia ablation versus antiarrhythmics in ischemic cardiomyopathy: a network meta-analysis.. Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-026-02250-9.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.