medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
Association of early life adversity with internalizing and externalizing behavior across 3 low- and middle-income countries.
СтатьяПрепринтНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koopowitz Sheri-Michelle, Shadwell Richard, Hoffman Nadia, Zar Heather J, Salum Giovanni, Pan Pedro M, Divan Gauri, Bhavnani Supriya, Stein Dan J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Early life adversity (ELA) is associated with increased internalizing and externalizing behavior in high-income cohorts. It is unclear to what extent these associations generalize to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We examined the association between ELA and internalizing and externalizing behaviors in children across three LMIC cohorts.
METHODS: Data from three LMIC cohorts, the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort (BHRC; n = 1111), Sustainable Programme Incorporating Nutrition and Games (SPRING; n = 601), and Drakenstein Child Health Study (DCHS; n = 708) were pooled. Children (7-10 years) were assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). ELA (first 24 months) was assessed using a cumulative index. Ordinary Least Squares linear regression models were run to examine the associations of adversity with internalizing and externalizing behaviors while adjusting for child age, sex, and cohort, and to test interactions with child age and cohort.
RESULTS: Measurement invariance did not hold across cohorts, necessitating within-cohort analyses. 2420 children (53.9% boys) were included in analyses. ELA was associated with higher SDQ total scores (B = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.16, 2.78, p < .001), internalizing (B = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.41, 1.27, p < .001), and externalizing behaviors (B = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.64, p < .001) in the full sample. Cohort-specific associations were strongest in the BHRC, with attenuated effects in SPRING and DCHS. Girls and older children exhibited fewer behavior problems. Interaction analyses indicated that the associations of adversity with behavior were stronger at younger ages and varied across cohorts.
CONCLUSION: In cohorts from the Global South, while there is an association between early life adversity and psychopathology, there are also important context-dependent differences across cohorts.
METHODS: Data from three LMIC cohorts, the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort (BHRC; n = 1111), Sustainable Programme Incorporating Nutrition and Games (SPRING; n = 601), and Drakenstein Child Health Study (DCHS; n = 708) were pooled. Children (7-10 years) were assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). ELA (first 24 months) was assessed using a cumulative index. Ordinary Least Squares linear regression models were run to examine the associations of adversity with internalizing and externalizing behaviors while adjusting for child age, sex, and cohort, and to test interactions with child age and cohort.
RESULTS: Measurement invariance did not hold across cohorts, necessitating within-cohort analyses. 2420 children (53.9% boys) were included in analyses. ELA was associated with higher SDQ total scores (B = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.16, 2.78, p < .001), internalizing (B = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.41, 1.27, p < .001), and externalizing behaviors (B = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.64, p < .001) in the full sample. Cohort-specific associations were strongest in the BHRC, with attenuated effects in SPRING and DCHS. Girls and older children exhibited fewer behavior problems. Interaction analyses indicated that the associations of adversity with behavior were stronger at younger ages and varied across cohorts.
CONCLUSION: In cohorts from the Global South, while there is an association between early life adversity and psychopathology, there are also important context-dependent differences across cohorts.