Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2021
Blood-flow restricted exercise following ankle fractures - A feasibility study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Larsen Peter, Platzer Oscar Just, Lollesgaard Lærke, Pedersen Samuel Krogh, Nielsen Peter Kruse, Rathleff Michael S, Bandholm Thomas, Jensen Stefan Teglhus, Elsoe Rasmus
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The objective was to investigate the feasibility of blood flow restricted exercise (BFRE) as a rehabilitation modality in patients with a unilateral ankle fracture.
METHODS: Feasibility study with a prospective cohort design. Inclusion criteria were above 18 years of age and unilateral ankle fractures.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: history of cardiac or embolic diseases, cancer, diabetes, hypertension and family history of cardio or vascular diseases. The predefined feasibility outcome was based on three criteria regarding patients experience with participating in the BFRE protocol and the absence of any serious adverse events.
RESULTS: Eight patients were included. Median age was 33 years (range: 23-60). All eight patients reported maximum satisfaction on the two questions regarding patient's perception of the overall experience with BFRE training and the feasibility to introduce BFRE as an intervention.
CONCLUSION: Early use of BFRE in patients with unilateral ankle fractures seems feasible in patients without comorbidity.
METHODS: Feasibility study with a prospective cohort design. Inclusion criteria were above 18 years of age and unilateral ankle fractures.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: history of cardiac or embolic diseases, cancer, diabetes, hypertension and family history of cardio or vascular diseases. The predefined feasibility outcome was based on three criteria regarding patients experience with participating in the BFRE protocol and the absence of any serious adverse events.
RESULTS: Eight patients were included. Median age was 33 years (range: 23-60). All eight patients reported maximum satisfaction on the two questions regarding patient's perception of the overall experience with BFRE training and the feasibility to introduce BFRE as an intervention.
CONCLUSION: Early use of BFRE in patients with unilateral ankle fractures seems feasible in patients without comorbidity.