Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2015
Communicating bronchopulmonary foregut malformation type IA: radiologic anatomy and clinical dilemmas.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
He Qiu-ming, Xiao Shang-jie, Zhu Xiao-chun, Xiao Wei-qiang, Wang Zhe, Zhong Wei, Xia Hui-min
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Communicating bronchopulmonary foregut malformation (CBPFM) type IA is extremely rare and is associated with a high mortality rate. This malformation manifests with communication between the lung and the foregut, and this can lead to esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF) to the distal pouch.
PURPOSE: To detail radiographic findings of CBPFM type IA cases and to summarize an appropriate therapeutic strategy for the management of this disorder.
METHODS: Medical data for two patients with CBPFM type IA were retrospectively reviewed with regard to radiographic characteristics, therapy, and outcome.
RESULTS: Both cases were initially misdiagnosed due to the presence of EA-TEF. Unusual atelectasis of the lateral lung was observed in chest radiographs, while non-aerated hypoplastic right lung and agenesis of the right main bronchus were detected by computed tomography. A final diagnosis was made by esophagogram. Only one patient survived following surgery.
CONCLUSION: CBPFM type IA is a rare condition and is extremely difficult to diagnose. However, CBPFM type IA should be suspected in patients manifesting EA and atelectasis of a unilateral lung on a chest radiograph. The decision to perform a pneumonectomy or bronchoplasty depends on the degree of exiting permitted due to pulmonary damage assessed by computed tomography.
PURPOSE: To detail radiographic findings of CBPFM type IA cases and to summarize an appropriate therapeutic strategy for the management of this disorder.
METHODS: Medical data for two patients with CBPFM type IA were retrospectively reviewed with regard to radiographic characteristics, therapy, and outcome.
RESULTS: Both cases were initially misdiagnosed due to the presence of EA-TEF. Unusual atelectasis of the lateral lung was observed in chest radiographs, while non-aerated hypoplastic right lung and agenesis of the right main bronchus were detected by computed tomography. A final diagnosis was made by esophagogram. Only one patient survived following surgery.
CONCLUSION: CBPFM type IA is a rare condition and is extremely difficult to diagnose. However, CBPFM type IA should be suspected in patients manifesting EA and atelectasis of a unilateral lung on a chest radiograph. The decision to perform a pneumonectomy or bronchoplasty depends on the degree of exiting permitted due to pulmonary damage assessed by computed tomography.