Brain & spine · 2024
Predictive factors for ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pereira Renato, Torres Beatriz, Nogueira João, Coimbra Frederica, Afonso Miguel, Alegria Carlos, Marques Renata
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) are life-threatening events with high mortality and morbidity. Hydrocephalus is a common complication, initially managed with an external ventricular drain (EVD). Persistent hydrocephalus often requires ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement to relieve intracranial pressure and prevent further neurological damage.
RESEARCH QUESTION: What factors predict the need for VPS placement in patients with aSAH, and how does a new predictive model compare to the Mayo Age, Grades, EVD score (MAGE score)?
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 105 patients with aSAH treated with EVD between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: those requiring VPS (n= 45) and those not requiring VPS (n= 60). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analysed, and a new predictive model (SAH-VP) was developed and compared to the MAGE score.
RESULTS: Patients who required VPS had higher WFNS scores on admission (p= 0.045), more infections requiring antibiotics (p= 0.002), more failed weaning attempts (p= 0.004), more failed closure attempts (p= 0.002), and longer EVD use (p< 0.01). The new SAH-VP model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: There is no consensus on the factors predicting VPS need in SAH patients. This study identified key predictors and developed a new predictive model, SAH-VP, which could improve patient management by identifying those at higher risk of requiring VPS, offering an alternative to the existing MAGE score.
RESEARCH QUESTION: What factors predict the need for VPS placement in patients with aSAH, and how does a new predictive model compare to the Mayo Age, Grades, EVD score (MAGE score)?
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 105 patients with aSAH treated with EVD between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: those requiring VPS (n= 45) and those not requiring VPS (n= 60). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analysed, and a new predictive model (SAH-VP) was developed and compared to the MAGE score.
RESULTS: Patients who required VPS had higher WFNS scores on admission (p= 0.045), more infections requiring antibiotics (p= 0.002), more failed weaning attempts (p= 0.004), more failed closure attempts (p= 0.002), and longer EVD use (p< 0.01). The new SAH-VP model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: There is no consensus on the factors predicting VPS need in SAH patients. This study identified key predictors and developed a new predictive model, SAH-VP, which could improve patient management by identifying those at higher risk of requiring VPS, offering an alternative to the existing MAGE score.