European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
Permanent pacemaker implantation following mitral valve surgery. State-of-the-art scoping review.
СтатьяScoping ReviewНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Finke Janina, Pasierski Michał, Dąbrowski Emil J, Kurasz Anna, Brączkowski Jakub, Drzażdżynska Alicja, Benny Aleena, Kozłowski Łukasz, Pawelczak Krzysztof, Stec Sebastian, Kuźma Łukasz, Urbanowicz Tomasz, Lorusso Roberto, Suwalski Piotr, Kowalewski Mariusz, Thoracic Research Centre; Endorsed by ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This scoping review investigates the prevalence, indications, risk factors, timing and outcomes related to permanent pacemaker implantation following mitral valve surgery.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify studies on permanent pacemaker implantation after mitral valve surgery. Relevant articles discussing prevalence, indications, risk factors, optimal timing, device choice and long-term dependency were included, prioritizing clinical studies and reviews published in the last 2 decades.
RESULTS: The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation after isolated mitral valve surgeries varies from 1% to 10%, with observation periods ranging from 2 to 12 days across centres. Atrioventricular block is the most common indication. Risk factors include older age, atrial fibrillation, reduced left ventricular function and prior cardiac surgery. Patients undergoing mitral valve replacement face a higher risk compared to those having mitral valve repair, while minimally invasive surgery and left atriotomy approach are linked to a lower permanent pacemaker rate. Long-term pacemaker dependency ranges between 20% and 60%, with increased rates observed in patients with atrioventricular block or those operated in the setting of infective endocarditis.
CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the complex interplay of factors influencing permanent pacemaker implantation after mitral valve surgery. Future research should focus on strategies to reduce postoperative conduction abnormalities and better identify patients who may require permanent pacemaker during long-term follow-up.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify studies on permanent pacemaker implantation after mitral valve surgery. Relevant articles discussing prevalence, indications, risk factors, optimal timing, device choice and long-term dependency were included, prioritizing clinical studies and reviews published in the last 2 decades.
RESULTS: The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation after isolated mitral valve surgeries varies from 1% to 10%, with observation periods ranging from 2 to 12 days across centres. Atrioventricular block is the most common indication. Risk factors include older age, atrial fibrillation, reduced left ventricular function and prior cardiac surgery. Patients undergoing mitral valve replacement face a higher risk compared to those having mitral valve repair, while minimally invasive surgery and left atriotomy approach are linked to a lower permanent pacemaker rate. Long-term pacemaker dependency ranges between 20% and 60%, with increased rates observed in patients with atrioventricular block or those operated in the setting of infective endocarditis.
CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the complex interplay of factors influencing permanent pacemaker implantation after mitral valve surgery. Future research should focus on strategies to reduce postoperative conduction abnormalities and better identify patients who may require permanent pacemaker during long-term follow-up.