DOI 10.1097/bot.0b013e318269b7b7
Radial head replacement for radial head fractures.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to analyze the clinical results after treatment of complex elbow injuries with modular anatomic radial head prosthesis (MARHP), along with ligament repair and fracture fixation.
DESIGN
Retrospective.
SETTING
District teaching hospital.
PATIENTS/
PARTICIPANTS
The inclusion criteria were all patients with traumatic elbow instability after acute fracture or fracture dislocation, where the radial head was comminuted and irreparable at the time of surgery (Mason type III) and there was associated valgus laxity of the elbow. Of 14 patients, 12 with radial head prosthesis were available for the study.
INTERVENTION: MARHP (Acumed, Hillsboro, OR) was used to replace irreparable and comminuted radial head fractures when it was associated with valgus instability.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically for a mean follow-up of 42 months (range, 22-58 months).
RESULTS
Patients recovered a similar range of motion between affected and unaffected elbows. Stability was restored to all 12 elbows, and all patients had a good or excellent result according to Mayo Elbow Performance Index and a disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand survey. Radiographic measurement revealed a congruent elbow joint.
CONCLUSION
The MARHP is effectively restoring stability and congruency to the elbow joint. There was no evidence of arthritic radiocapitellar joint, capitellar osteopenia, significant proximal radial migration of the implant, or any major complications. Outcomes were optimized by recognition and addressing the associated injuries.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.