BMC cancer · 2025
Evaluation indicators for bladder dysfunction in Chinese patients following cervical cancer surgery: a Delphi study based on nursing outcomes classification.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Han Xianhong, Di Ruiqing, Zhang Huanjun, Zhou Bingqian
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop scientific and standard evaluation indicators related to bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery, providing a reference for clinical nurses in China.
METHODS: According to the framework of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (3rd edition), nursing outcomes and indicators were screened through a literature review and clinical investigation. Subsequently, the Delphi expert consultation method was used to revise and determine the core outcomes and indicators.
RESULTS: A total of 28 experts participated in the correspondence consultation. The valid recovery rates for the two rounds were 93.33% and 100%, respectively. The expert authority coefficient averaged 0.90, and the Kendall harmony coefficient ranged between 0.216 and 0.352 (P < 0.05). Finally, 7 core nursing outcomes and 57 indicators were identified for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery.
CONCLUSION: The revised core nursing outcomes and indicators are valuable for developing specialized nursing measures and evaluating nursing outcomes for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery. Additionally, they provide a reference for promoting standardized nursing language in China.
METHODS: According to the framework of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (3rd edition), nursing outcomes and indicators were screened through a literature review and clinical investigation. Subsequently, the Delphi expert consultation method was used to revise and determine the core outcomes and indicators.
RESULTS: A total of 28 experts participated in the correspondence consultation. The valid recovery rates for the two rounds were 93.33% and 100%, respectively. The expert authority coefficient averaged 0.90, and the Kendall harmony coefficient ranged between 0.216 and 0.352 (P < 0.05). Finally, 7 core nursing outcomes and 57 indicators were identified for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery.
CONCLUSION: The revised core nursing outcomes and indicators are valuable for developing specialized nursing measures and evaluating nursing outcomes for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery. Additionally, they provide a reference for promoting standardized nursing language in China.