MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.purol.2021.09.007

Медицинская библиотека · Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2021

[Complications of mid-urethral sling - A review from the Committee for Female Urology and Pelviperineology for the French Association of Urology].

Even L, Tibi B, Bentellis I, Treacy P J, Berrogain N, Bosset P O, Campagne-Loiseau S, Cardot V, Charles T, Deffieux X, Donon L, Girard F, Hermieu J-F, Hurel S, Klap J, Meyer F, Peyrat L, Thuillier C, Vidart A, Wagner L, Cornu J N

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Placement of a mid-urethral sling is the gold standard in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women in France. The cure rate of this material is no longer to be demonstrated, but the per- and post-operative complications are currently the subject of a growing controversy not only in Europe but also across the Channel and across the Atlantic, having led to the modification of operative indications. In France, recommendations are also evolving with a stricter framework for indications for surgery by multidisciplinary consultation meeting and an obligation for postoperative follow-up in the short and long term.

OBJECTIVES

In this context, CUROPF realized a review of the literature bringing together the available scientific evidence concerning the occurrence of per- and post-operative complications relating to the installation of mid urethral sling. The bibliographic search was carried out using the Medline database and 123 articles were selected.

RESULTS

Analysis of the data highlights various complications, depending on the implanted material, the patient and the indication for surgery. The retro-pubic mid urethral sling provides more bladder erosion during surgery (up to 14%), more suprapubic pain (up to 4%) and more acute urinary retention (up to 19,7%) and postoperative dysuria (up to 26%). The trans obturator mid-urethral sling is responsible for more vaginal erosion during the operation (up to 10,9%), more lower limb pain of neurological origin (up to 26,7%). The risk of developing over active bladder is similar in both procedures (up to 33%). But these risks of complications must be balanced by the strong impact of urinary incontinence surgery on the overall quality of life of these women.

CONCLUSION

Thus, surgical failure and long term complications exist but should not limit the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence with mid urethral tape. Women should be treated with individualized decision-making process and long-term follow -up is necessary.

Для цитирования: Even L, Tibi B, Bentellis I, Treacy P J, Berrogain N, Bosset P O, Campagne-Loiseau S, Cardot V, Charles T, Deffieux X, Donon L, Girard F, Hermieu J-F, Hurel S, Klap J, Meyer F, Peyrat L, Thuillier C, Vidart A, Wagner L, Cornu J N. [Complications of mid-urethral sling - A review from the Committee for Female Urology and Pelviperineology for the French Association of Urology].. Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2021.09.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.