Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction · 2008
[Prevention and early management of immediate postpartum haemorrhage: policies in six perinatal networks in France].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deneux-Tharaux C, Dreyfus M, Goffinet F, Lansac J, Lemery D, Parant O, Chauveaud A, Bréart G, Bouvier-Colle M-H, le groupe Euphrates
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) constitutes the leading cause of maternal deaths in France, and the majority of these deaths are preventable. The objective of this study was to ascertain policies for prevention and early management of PPH in maternity units, and to compare the results with scientific evidence. The survey was part of the Euphrates European project, and was conducted in France in 2003 before national recommendations for clinical practice related to PPH were launched.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional declarative survey was conducted in six perinatal networks representing 132 maternity units. A postal questionnaire was sent to all units. Main outcomes measured were stated policies for prevention, diagnosis and management of PPH.
RESULTS: There was no definition of PPH in one out of four units, and no written protocol for PPH management in one out of six. Policies of using preventive uterotonics were widespread, but variation was observed concerning the timing of administration, and association with the other components of active management of the third stage of labour. Policies about drugs used for management of PPH also varied.
CONCLUSION: Variations in policies show firstly that evidence-based improvement in practice is possible, and secondly that further research is needed on poorly documented aspects of PPH management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional declarative survey was conducted in six perinatal networks representing 132 maternity units. A postal questionnaire was sent to all units. Main outcomes measured were stated policies for prevention, diagnosis and management of PPH.
RESULTS: There was no definition of PPH in one out of four units, and no written protocol for PPH management in one out of six. Policies of using preventive uterotonics were widespread, but variation was observed concerning the timing of administration, and association with the other components of active management of the third stage of labour. Policies about drugs used for management of PPH also varied.
CONCLUSION: Variations in policies show firstly that evidence-based improvement in practice is possible, and secondly that further research is needed on poorly documented aspects of PPH management.