MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joms.2021.12.003

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2021

Pitfalls of Surgeon-Engineer Communication and the Effect of In-House Engineer Training During Digital Planning of Patient-Specific Implants for Orbital Reconstruction.

Korn Philippe, Jehn Philipp, Nejati-Rad Narin, Winterboer Jan, Gellrich Nils-Claudius, Spalthoff Simon

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The use of patient-specific implants for reconstruction of complex orbital floor defects is increasing and requires communication with an industry partner, which warrants investigation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of in-house training of engineers on such communication as well as to identify frequent sources of problems and their solutions for improvement of the implant-planning workflow.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study and enrolled a sample of patients who had undergone orbital reconstruction with patient-specific implants between 2017 and 2020. The predictor variables were in-house training (additional training completed in hospital or not) and implant complexity (complex [multiwalled implants] vs less complex [isolated orbital floor reconstructions]). The outcome variables were duration of communication, message length, and need for synchronous communication or modifications to the original design. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistics were computed, and statistical significance was set at a P value of < 0.05.

RESULTS

This study included the data of 66 patients (48 men and 18 women, average age: 42.27 years). The complexity of the implant statistically significantly increased the duration of the communication (8.76 vs 16.03 days; P = .004). In 72.73%, the initial design had to be changed. Engineers trained in house required less communication to plan less-complex implants and generally needed fewer corrections to the original design (P = .020 and P = .036, respectively). Problems during planning were observed in 25.76% of the cases, with an insufficient diagnostic 3-dimensional data set being the most common (15.15%).

CONCLUSIONS

In-house training of engineers is time-saving while planning the workflow for patient-specific implants, especially in less-complex cases, given that design changes are not needed often. The high rate of data sets that were insufficient for planning patient-specific implants suggests that diagnostic 3-dimensional data sets should already meet the requirements for such planning.

Для цитирования: Korn Philippe, Jehn Philipp, Nejati-Rad Narin, Winterboer Jan, Gellrich Nils-Claudius, Spalthoff Simon. Pitfalls of Surgeon-Engineer Communication and the Effect of In-House Engineer Training During Digital Planning of Patient-Specific Implants for Orbital Reconstruction.. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.12.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.