MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/brainsci8090171

Медицинская библиотека · Brain sciences · 2018

Beyond the Literal Meaning of Words in Children with Klinefelter Syndrome: Two Case Studies.

Melogno Sergio, Pinto Maria Antonietta, Orsolini Margherita, Tarani Luigi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Literature on children with Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) points to general linguistic difficulties in both comprehension and production among other cognitive functions, and in the majority of cases, these coexist with an intellectual level within the norms. In these conditions, children having language delay generally engage in language therapy and are systematically monitored across ages. In this article, we present the profiles of two children with KS (47, XXY), aged 9.1 (Child S) and 13 (Child D), whose language development was assessed as adequate at age 3, and for this reason, did not receive any language treatment. At the present stage, their IQ, as measured by Wechsler Scales (Child S: 92; Child D: 101), is within the norm, but they both present marked weaknesses in pragmatic skills such as figurative language comprehension. The analysis of these two cases points to the need to go beyond global indexes of verbal abilities, as the same global index may mask a wide diversification of individual profiles. In addition, this study underlines the importance of monitoring the developmental trajectories of children like Child D and Child S, because weaknesses in pragmatic skills that are relevant for both academic achievement and social adaptation could emerge at later stages.

Для цитирования: Melogno Sergio, Pinto Maria Antonietta, Orsolini Margherita, Tarani Luigi. Beyond the Literal Meaning of Words in Children with Klinefelter Syndrome: Two Case Studies.. Brain sciences. 2018. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci8090171.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.