A comparative evaluation of retromandibular versus Modified Risdon approach in surgical treatment of condylar fracture.

The purpose of this study was aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of retromandibular versus modified Risdon approach using periangular incision for open reduction and internal fixation of low subcondylar mandibular fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation with different plating systems were utilized via retromandibular approach (group I) and via modified Risdon approach with periangular incision (group II). Twenty four (n= 24) condylar fractures in 21 adult patients were divided randomly into two equal groups (12 each) according to the cutaneous incision (approach) utilized. The evaluation score for scarring in group I it was excellent in 9 patients, good in 2 patients and acceptable in only one patient (Mean 2.4 ± SD 3.38). While in group II was excellent in 10 patients and good in 2 patients (Mean 2.4 ± SD 3.87) and the p value was 0.591. Symptoms of transient facial nerve weakness were noted in only 3 patients in group I with slight to moderate dysfunction (Mean 2 ± SD 3.21), while only one patient had facial nerve weakness in group II with House - Brackman score of 2 immediate postoperatively and this got resolved in 6 weeks (Mean 2 ± SD 4.04) and the p value was 0.00022. Within the limitations of the study it seems that a modified Risdon approach using periangular incision for reduction and fixation of low subcondylar fracture should be preferred whenever possible because it yields better outcomes.