MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/rcr2.1439

Медицинская библиотека · Respirology case reports · 2024

A rare case of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis complicating pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma.

Okada Yoshihiro, Sakaguchi Kazuhiro, Tanimura Kazuya, Horimoto Kazuhide, Kawaguchi Takeshi, Hamaji Masatsugu, Takeda Maiko, Hontsu Shigeto, Muro Shigeo

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 72-year-old man with productive cough and wheezing was referred to our institution for a growing mass shadow and central bronchiectasis in the right lower lobe on computed tomography. Based on the symptoms, elevated Aspergillus-specific immunoglobulin E levels, and radiological findings, allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis (ABPM) was suspected according to the Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria. The patient refused bronchoscopic examination, and oral prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day) improved the symptoms; however, the mass shadow continued to grow. Subsequently, bronchoscopy revealed mucus plugs and an endobronchial tumour with a whitish surface. The tumour was surgically resected, and the pathological diagnosis was a coexistence of ABPM and pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of ABPM developing at the site of pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. Careful bronchoscopic examinations and histopathological evaluations of the surgical specimen led to a prompt and accurate diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Okada Yoshihiro, Sakaguchi Kazuhiro, Tanimura Kazuya, Horimoto Kazuhide, Kawaguchi Takeshi, Hamaji Masatsugu, Takeda Maiko, Hontsu Shigeto, Muro Shigeo. A rare case of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis complicating pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma.. Respirology case reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.1439.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.