MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100421

Медицинская библиотека · BJA open · 2025

Investigating the effectiveness of an intraoperative decision support guided fluid therapy intervention on postoperative outcome of high-risk patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery: protocol for an international multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-randomised implementation trial.

Coeckelenbergh Sean, Delaporte Amelie, Rousseleau Damien, De Montblanc Jacques, Roullet Stephanie, Ramadan Joanna, Cholley Bernard, Sitbon Alexandre, Weiss Emmanuel, Kassab Maria-Christina, Diop Sylvain, Manzi Elsa, Pustetto Marco, Porta Bonette Guillaume, Guinot Pierre Gregoire, Guerci Philippe, Vanhonacker Domien, Carrier Francois Martin, Alexander Brenton, Rinehart Joseph, Boldt David, Grogan Tristan, Cannesson Maxime, Duranteau Jacques, Grimaldi Lamiae, Pereira Bruno, Joosten Alexandre

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate fluid administration can impact patient outcome. Intraoperative advanced haemodynamic monitoring coupled with a treatment protocol based on stroke volume optimisation can help determine the appropriate timing for fluid boluses. Although recommended by several anaesthesia societies, this strategy is rarely implemented because protocols are complex and compliance is often poor. The Acumen Assisted Fluid Management (AFM) software is a decision support system that uses machine learning to predict fluid responsiveness and individualise fluid therapy. AFM reportedly predicts fluid responsiveness better than clinicians, decreases preload-dependent states, and improves both macro- and microcirculatory variables. The goal of this international multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial is to test whether implementing AFM during high-risk surgery improves patient outcome.

METHODS

The trial is ongoing in 16 academic hospitals in France, Belgium, Canada, and the USA. All centres (clusters) deliver routine care (control arm) at the start of the study and crossed over (one way) to AFM-guided fluid therapy (intervention arm). The time when different centres switch to AFM is randomised by an independent statistician. At the end of the trial, all centres will cross over to the intervention group. The primary outcome is a composite of major complications and death 30 days after surgery that will be analysed as intention-to-treat. A total of 2000 patients are required to detect a relative 20% differences in the primary outcome between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial is powered to provide evidence on whether implementing AFM is effective in reducing postoperative complications in high-risk patients after high-risk abdominal surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06011187.

Для цитирования: Coeckelenbergh Sean, Delaporte Amelie, Rousseleau Damien, De Montblanc Jacques, Roullet Stephanie, Ramadan Joanna, Cholley Bernard, Sitbon Alexandre, Weiss Emmanuel, Kassab Maria-Christina, Diop Sylvain, Manzi Elsa, Pustetto Marco, Porta Bonette Guillaume, Guinot Pierre Gregoire, Guerci Philippe, Vanhonacker Domien, Carrier Francois Martin, Alexander Brenton, Rinehart Joseph, Boldt David, Grogan Tristan, Cannesson Maxime, Duranteau Jacques, Grimaldi Lamiae, Pereira Bruno, Joosten Alexandre. Investigating the effectiveness of an intraoperative decision support guided fluid therapy intervention on postoperative outcome of high-risk patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery: protocol for an international multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-randomised implementation trial.. BJA open. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100421.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.