MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.07.001

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of mycobacteriology · 2016

Evaluation of different laboratory methods for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy.

Amer Safaa, Hefnawy Azza El, Wahab Nashwa Abdel, Okasha Hadir, Baz Amira

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVE

Tuberculous pleurisy is a diagnostic challenge due to its nonspecific clinical presentation, paucibacillary nature of the effusion together with the inefficiency of conventional laboratory methods motivating the evaluation of variable diagnostic strategies.

METHODS

Using thoracoscopy, the pleural cavity of 50 patients with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion were fully examined and biopsy specimens of affected parietal pleura were taken under direct vision. Pleural fluid and biopsy specimen were subjected to microscopic examination (direct and after cytocentrifugation), culture, PCR, and histopathological examination.

RESULTS

The pleural biopsy specimens proved to have a higher detection rate of tubercle bacilli than pleural fluid. Also, cytocentrifugation improved the sensitivity of microscopic detection for both pleural fluid and biopsy specimens.

CONCLUSION

The combination of microbiological results and histopathology examination of the pleural biopsy specimens is essential for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy, as microbiological examination of pleural biopsy specimens has proved to have a higher detection rate than pleural fluid examination.

Для цитирования: Amer Safaa, Hefnawy Azza El, Wahab Nashwa Abdel, Okasha Hadir, Baz Amira. Evaluation of different laboratory methods for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy.. International journal of mycobacteriology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.07.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.