Prenatal diagnosis · 2025
How Useful is Nuchal Translucency in Detecting Chromosomal Abnormalities Missed by Genome-Wide NIPT and What Measurement Threshold Should Be Used?
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Han May Phoo, Ferreira Ana Elizabeth Gomes de Melo Tavares, Elhindi James, McLennan Andrew C, Scott Fergus
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (gwNIPT) has screening limitations for detectable genetic conditions and cannot detect microdeletions/microduplications (MD) or triploidy. Nuchal translucency (NT) increases with gestation and with genetic or structural abnormalities. This study aims to determine the utility of NT measurement in detecting genetic abnormalities not identified by gwNIPT and the optimal NT threshold value.
METHODS: A 4-year retrospective study of singleton pregnancies undergoing first-line gwNIPT aneuploidy screening where invasive prenatal testing by CVS/or amniocentesis was subsequently undertaken. Population proportions for static and multiple of the median (MoM) NT cut-offs were derived from all 11-14 weeks ultrasound examinations.
RESULTS: Among 919 pregnancies with gwNIPT and invasive testing, 338 had a single genetic abnormality. There were 9 false negative GwNIPT results and a further 26 undetectable abnormalities (18 MD, 8 triploidy) in this cohort. Twelve had a dual chromosomal abnormality, four of which returned a low-risk gwNIPT. Thirty-three "missed cases" also had a 13-week scan, to which the various NT threshold values (3.0 mm, 1.6 MoM, 3.5 mm, and 1.9 MoM) were applied. In only 3 (9%) cases did the NT exceed 3.0 mm with similar detection rates (DR) for all higher cut-offs. Static and MoM-based NT cut-offs had similar positive predictive values (PPV).
CONCLUSION: Enlarged NT measurement is a poor predictor of genetic abnormalities not identified by gwNIPT. When applied, the fixed NT cut-off of 3.5 mm provides a low FPR with a similar DR to lower cut-off thresholds, resulting in a higher PPV.
METHODS: A 4-year retrospective study of singleton pregnancies undergoing first-line gwNIPT aneuploidy screening where invasive prenatal testing by CVS/or amniocentesis was subsequently undertaken. Population proportions for static and multiple of the median (MoM) NT cut-offs were derived from all 11-14 weeks ultrasound examinations.
RESULTS: Among 919 pregnancies with gwNIPT and invasive testing, 338 had a single genetic abnormality. There were 9 false negative GwNIPT results and a further 26 undetectable abnormalities (18 MD, 8 triploidy) in this cohort. Twelve had a dual chromosomal abnormality, four of which returned a low-risk gwNIPT. Thirty-three "missed cases" also had a 13-week scan, to which the various NT threshold values (3.0 mm, 1.6 MoM, 3.5 mm, and 1.9 MoM) were applied. In only 3 (9%) cases did the NT exceed 3.0 mm with similar detection rates (DR) for all higher cut-offs. Static and MoM-based NT cut-offs had similar positive predictive values (PPV).
CONCLUSION: Enlarged NT measurement is a poor predictor of genetic abnormalities not identified by gwNIPT. When applied, the fixed NT cut-off of 3.5 mm provides a low FPR with a similar DR to lower cut-off thresholds, resulting in a higher PPV.