MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80096-5

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 1998

Endothelial study of iris-claw phakic lens: four year follow-up.

Menezo J L, Cisneros A L, Rodriguez-Salvador V

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To study quantitative and morphometric endothelial changes in phakic eyes implanted with the Worst iris-claw lens to correct high myopia.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital "La Fe", Valencia, Spain.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 111 phakic eyes (73 patients) implanted with the Worst iris-claw lens. Noncontact specular microscopy and computer-assisted analysis was performed preoperatively and 6 months and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean cell loss was 3.85% at 6 months, 6.59% at 1 year, 9.22% at 2 years, 11.68% at 3 years, and 13.42% at 4 years. At 2 years, the hexagonality and coefficient variation in cell size were close to the preoperative levels. No major complications were seen; early postoperative corneal touch required intraocular lens (IOL) removal in 1 case (0.9%). Four eyes (3.6%) needed a reoperation because of poor IOL fixation (2 eyes), traumatic subluxation of the IOL (1 eye), and miscalculation of the IOL power (1 eye).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was a slight progressive cell loss after IOL implantation, the morphometric changes recovered and were close to the preoperative levels. This suggests that endothelial damage occurred primarily during the surgical procedure.

Для цитирования: Menezo J L, Cisneros A L, Rodriguez-Salvador V. Endothelial study of iris-claw phakic lens: four year follow-up.. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80096-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.