Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 1998
Endothelial damage with cataract surgery techniques.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Díaz-Valle D, Benítez del Castillo Sánchez J M, Castillo A, Sayagués O, Moriche M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate intraoperative endothelial damage after planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with difference capsulotomy techniques and phacoemulsification.
SETTING: San Carlos University Hospital, Castroviejo Institute, Madrid, Spain.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, 60 patients with senile cataract scheduled for cataract surgery were divided into three groups of 20 each: Group 1 had phacoemulsification; Group 2, planned ECCE with continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis; and Group 3, ECCE with letter-box capsulotomy. Preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, endothelial cell density, percentage of hexagonality, and the cell size variation coefficient were determined by contact specular microscopy; endothelial permeability was examined by anterior segment fluorophotometry and central corneal thickness, by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results were analyzed using the two-tailed Student's t-test and analysis of variance.
RESULTS: In all three groups, endothelial permeability and cell loss increased significantly from the preoperative values, but there were not significant differences among the postoperative values. Mean cell loss was 11.8% in Group 1, 12.8% in Group 2, and 10.1% in Group 3. There were no differences between the preoperative and postoperative morphometric indexes. Postoperative pachymetric measurements were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial response was not statistically significantly different among the surgical techniques, although endothelial damage was lower in Group 3, which could indicate a protective effect of the anterior capsule during cataract extraction. Endothelial barrier function remained disturbed despite the apparent morphological stabilization.
SETTING: San Carlos University Hospital, Castroviejo Institute, Madrid, Spain.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, 60 patients with senile cataract scheduled for cataract surgery were divided into three groups of 20 each: Group 1 had phacoemulsification; Group 2, planned ECCE with continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis; and Group 3, ECCE with letter-box capsulotomy. Preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, endothelial cell density, percentage of hexagonality, and the cell size variation coefficient were determined by contact specular microscopy; endothelial permeability was examined by anterior segment fluorophotometry and central corneal thickness, by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results were analyzed using the two-tailed Student's t-test and analysis of variance.
RESULTS: In all three groups, endothelial permeability and cell loss increased significantly from the preoperative values, but there were not significant differences among the postoperative values. Mean cell loss was 11.8% in Group 1, 12.8% in Group 2, and 10.1% in Group 3. There were no differences between the preoperative and postoperative morphometric indexes. Postoperative pachymetric measurements were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial response was not statistically significantly different among the surgical techniques, although endothelial damage was lower in Group 3, which could indicate a protective effect of the anterior capsule during cataract extraction. Endothelial barrier function remained disturbed despite the apparent morphological stabilization.