Consideration of intersectoral costs and benefits in health economic evaluations of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review explores which intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs) are considered in the economic evaluation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) across different age groups and the related impacts on the results of economic evaluations.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched from 2009 to 2024 for full economic evaluations (Ees) of PCVs from a societal perspective. ICBs were presented narratively and in tabular form. Studies were appraised on quality, and PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

In all, 57 studies were included. ICBs were captured in the following sectors: patient and family, paid labor (productivity), nonpaid productivity, other sectors (education, leisure, consumption), unspecified sectors for ecological effects (herd immunity, serotype replacement, cross-protection), and equity. In cases where the comparator was no vaccination, 10 studies reported that PCVs were dominant when ICBs were included. After excluding dominant analyses, the median QALY-based incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) reduction ranged from -3.25 percent (for patient/family costs and productivity loss) to -46.02 percent (in children with ecological effects). Among DALY-based studies, the inclusion of ecological effects reduced the median ICER by -22.97 percent. In head-to-head comparisons, 16 studies reported that PCVs were dominant when ICBs were included.

CONCLUSION

Inclusion of ICBs, except for serotype replacement, showed favorable cost-effectiveness results. This study provides a framework for identifying the intersectoral costs and benefits for the health economic evaluation of PCVs in children and adults.