Outcomes and Predictors for Re-stenosis of Esophageal Stricture in Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND

Esophageal strictures are the common gastrointestinal complications in patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) requiring dilation. There is limited information on the best type of intervention, outcomes, and predictors for re-stenosis.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the frequency, clinical presentation of esophageal strictures in EB patients, and to ascertain the predictors of re-stenosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study involving 7 specialized, international EB centers on patients who were 0 to 50 years of age. Descriptive statistics and hazard risks for re-stenosis were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 125 patients with 497 esophageal stricture episodes over a mean period of observation of 17 (standard deviation [SD] = 11.91) years. Dilations were attempted in 90.74% of episodes, using guided fluoroscopy 45.23%, retrograde endoscopy 33.04%, and antegrade endoscopy 19.07%. Successful dilation was accomplished in 99.33% of attempts. Patients experienced a median of 2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-7) stricture episodes with a median interval between dilations of 7 (IQR: 4-12) months. Predictors for re-stenosis included: number of strictures (2 vs 1 stricture: χ = 4.293, P = 0.038, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.294 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.014--1.652 and 3 vs 1 stricture:χ = 7.986, P = 0.005, HR = 1.785 [95% CI: 1.194, 2.667]) and a long (≥1 cm) segment stricture (χ = 4.599, P = 0.032, HR = 1.347 (95% CI: 1.026--1.769). Complications were more common with the endoscopic approach (8/86, antegrade endoscopy; 2 /149, retrograde endoscopy vs 2/204, fluoroscopy; χ = 17.39, P-value <0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

We found excellent dilation outcomes irrespective of the dilation procedure; however, with higher complications in the endoscopic approach. Long (>1 cm) segment involvement and multiple locations were predictive of stricture reoccurrence.