Age and ageing · 2025
Routine benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) physiotherapy management: a feasibility study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bicknell Erin Dale, Ferguson Laura, da Silva Alisha, Theoharidis Tiffany, Gohil Khyati, Langford Jennifer, Clarke Melissa, McGann Anne, Bower Wendy
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is common in older adults with a falls history. The feasibility of routine physiotherapy management in subacute inpatients is not known.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the feasibility of implementing routine BPPV physiotherapy management in older subacute inpatients and ascertain the proportion BPPV positive.
METHODS: Subacute inpatients aged ≥50 years sustaining a fall within six months were assessed for BPPV. Feasibility was defined as >75% of eligible patients able to be assessed for BPPV. Implementation was also evaluated through surveys completed by study physiotherapists. Demographic, falls, medical history, frailty, functional mobility information and modified dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) versions were also collected.
RESULTS: Overall, 67% of 447 eligible patients underwent BPPV assessment; 301 completed ≥ one BPPV assessment, 146 could not be assessed, most commonly due to physical limitation, cognition precluding assessment, declining assessment or discharged prior. Physiotherapists perceived BPPV management to be acceptable (88%), appropriate (90%) and feasible (76%) however constrained by patient-factors, time required and environmental barriers. BPPV was found in 6% of those assessed, with 35% reporting current dizziness or unsteadiness. Modified DHI scores were significantly higher in those BPPV positive (5-item P ≤ .001; 8-item P = .001).
CONCLUSION: BPPV management was not feasible in this population predominantly due to physical limitations and cognitive impairment. Physiotherapists perceive BPPV management as important but difficult amongst these patient-factors and competing clinical priorities. Subjective symptoms may not indicate BPPV risk, however, the 5-item DHI may identify need for individual assessment.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the feasibility of implementing routine BPPV physiotherapy management in older subacute inpatients and ascertain the proportion BPPV positive.
METHODS: Subacute inpatients aged ≥50 years sustaining a fall within six months were assessed for BPPV. Feasibility was defined as >75% of eligible patients able to be assessed for BPPV. Implementation was also evaluated through surveys completed by study physiotherapists. Demographic, falls, medical history, frailty, functional mobility information and modified dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) versions were also collected.
RESULTS: Overall, 67% of 447 eligible patients underwent BPPV assessment; 301 completed ≥ one BPPV assessment, 146 could not be assessed, most commonly due to physical limitation, cognition precluding assessment, declining assessment or discharged prior. Physiotherapists perceived BPPV management to be acceptable (88%), appropriate (90%) and feasible (76%) however constrained by patient-factors, time required and environmental barriers. BPPV was found in 6% of those assessed, with 35% reporting current dizziness or unsteadiness. Modified DHI scores were significantly higher in those BPPV positive (5-item P ≤ .001; 8-item P = .001).
CONCLUSION: BPPV management was not feasible in this population predominantly due to physical limitations and cognitive impairment. Physiotherapists perceive BPPV management as important but difficult amongst these patient-factors and competing clinical priorities. Subjective symptoms may not indicate BPPV risk, however, the 5-item DHI may identify need for individual assessment.