MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025
82Rb positron emission tomography myocardial blood flow quantification: Influence of arterial input curve quality on diagnostic accuracy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fujito Hidesato, Lemley Mark, Builoff Valerie, Zhang Wenhao, Kuronuma Keiichiro, Ramirez Giselle, Killekar Aditya, Liang Joanna X, Kavanagh Paul, Hyun Mark C, Hayes Sean W, Thomson Louise E J, Friedman John D, Van Kriekinge Serge D, Di Carli Marcelo F, Dey Damini, Berman Daniel S, Slomka Piotr J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether the shape of arterial blood input curves affects the diagnostic performance of myocardial blood flow (MBF) on rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively enrolled 386 patients without prior CAD who underwent 82Rb PET-MPI and invasive coronary angiography within 6 months, from 2010 to 2018. Abnormal shapes of stress left atrial blood pool (BP) time activity curve were characterized into five categories based on visual/quantitative assessment: (1) low stress/rest peak ratio (SRPR), (2) slow activity rise, (3) slow activity decline, (4) broad peak and (5) multiple peaks. The SRPR was defined as the ratio of peak count value on the stress BP activity by rest BP activity. A low SRPR was defined as one below the median value (0.82). We compared the diagnostic performance of stress MBF and myocardial flow reserve for detecting obstructive CAD (≥70% stenosis) using area under the curve (AUC) analysis.
RESULTS: Among the five abnormal categories, the AUC of stress MBF in the low SRPR group (n = 193) was lower than in the normal SRPR group (n = 193) in per-patient (.67 [.59-.74] vs. .78 [.70-.84], P = .0499, respectively) and per-vessel analyses (.68 [.63-0.73] vs. .75 [.71-.79], P = .0352, respectively). The AUC in slow activity rise group (n = 167) for stress MBF was lower than in others in per-vessel analysis (n = 219) (.68 [.62-.72] vs. .75 [.70-.79], P = .0270). Other abnormal profiles showed no significant differences (all P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Low SRPR and slow activity rise were associated with reduced diagnostic performance of stress MBF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively enrolled 386 patients without prior CAD who underwent 82Rb PET-MPI and invasive coronary angiography within 6 months, from 2010 to 2018. Abnormal shapes of stress left atrial blood pool (BP) time activity curve were characterized into five categories based on visual/quantitative assessment: (1) low stress/rest peak ratio (SRPR), (2) slow activity rise, (3) slow activity decline, (4) broad peak and (5) multiple peaks. The SRPR was defined as the ratio of peak count value on the stress BP activity by rest BP activity. A low SRPR was defined as one below the median value (0.82). We compared the diagnostic performance of stress MBF and myocardial flow reserve for detecting obstructive CAD (≥70% stenosis) using area under the curve (AUC) analysis.
RESULTS: Among the five abnormal categories, the AUC of stress MBF in the low SRPR group (n = 193) was lower than in the normal SRPR group (n = 193) in per-patient (.67 [.59-.74] vs. .78 [.70-.84], P = .0499, respectively) and per-vessel analyses (.68 [.63-0.73] vs. .75 [.71-.79], P = .0352, respectively). The AUC in slow activity rise group (n = 167) for stress MBF was lower than in others in per-vessel analysis (n = 219) (.68 [.62-.72] vs. .75 [.70-.79], P = .0270). Other abnormal profiles showed no significant differences (all P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Low SRPR and slow activity rise were associated with reduced diagnostic performance of stress MBF.