MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology · 2004

Clinical, electrophysiological and magnetic resonance imaging findings in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Musluoğlu L, Celik M, Tabak H, Forta H

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to compare them with electrophysiological findings.

METHODS

Routine motor and sensory nerve conduction examinations and needle EMG were performed in 42 hands of 22 patients, who were clinically diagnosed as having CTS in at least one wrist.

RESULTS

Of 29 wrists with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS, MRI could detect abnormality in 18 wrists (62%). Median nerve was found to be abnormal in MRI in 1 of 2 wrists with suspected clinical symptoms and proven CTS by electrophysiological examination. MRI was abnormal in 1 of 4 wrists with normal clinical and electrophysiological examination. MRI was abnormal in 46, 7% of wrists with mild CTS, in 61.6% of moderate CTS and in 100% of severe CTS. Volar bulging of the flexor retinaculum was detected in a single wrist with severe CTS. Enlargement of median nerve was observed in 3 of 5 severe CTS.

CONCLUSION

MRI could be useful in the diagnosis of unproven cases in CTS. It also provides anatomical information that correlate well with electrophysiological findings in regard of the severity of median nerve compression.

Для цитирования: Musluoğlu L, Celik M, Tabak H, Forta H. Clinical, electrophysiological and magnetic resonance imaging findings in carpal tunnel syndrome.. Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.