MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/01443610500119739

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2005

Coping with placenta praevia and accreta in a DGH setting and words of caution.

Sinha P, Oniya O, Bewley S

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The incidence of placenta praevia and accreta has been increasing with rising caesarean section rates. We highlight the increasing incidence of severe post-partum haemorrhage due to placenta accreta. Four cases occurred within 3 years (2002--2004) in a small District General Hospital (DGH) with a delivery rate of 1,800 per year. All of the cases had previous caesarean sections and three had an associated anterior low-lying placenta. These patients were diagnosed to have placenta accreta in the third stage of labour, as the placenta was completely adherent and was difficult to remove. However, two of them had a provisional diagnosis made of placenta accreta and prophylactic measures had been taken in the form of counselling and consent for possible hysterectomy. Patients were counselled regarding this condition, and the possible need for hysterectomy was discussed. Two of them had to be managed by post-partum hysterectomy and the other two were treated conservatively. The purpose of writing these case reports is to warn others of the need for vigilance, particularly in keeping their primary caesarean section rates down and being prepared for long-term complications.

Для цитирования: Sinha P, Oniya O, Bewley S. Coping with placenta praevia and accreta in a DGH setting and words of caution.. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2005. DOI: 10.1080/01443610500119739.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.