MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41372-025-02392-0

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025

Current prenatal counseling of congenital heart disease in trisomy 18, pediatric cardiologists' perspective: a Fetal Heart Society Research Collaborative Study.

Kosiv Katherine A, Wong Bob G, Anderson Rebecca A, Carey John C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Survival outcomes are shifting in trisomy 18 as cardiac disease is being repaired in infancy reminiscent of trisomy 21. The landscape of prenatal counseling related to cardiac disease and trisomy 18 is unknown.

STUDY

DESIGN

A survey was distributed to pediatric cardiologists presenting two scenarios of cardiac disease varying by genetic diagnosis: trisomy 18 vs 21. Respondents were asked if cardiac surgery would be offered and ranked the importance of various factors in decision-making.

RESULT: Sixty three percent described surgery as an option in trisomy 18 compared to 97% in trisomy 21. Genetic diagnosis was most important in trisomy 18 compared to neonatal survival in trisomy 21. Quality of life and survival to discharge were least important in trisomy 18 compared to genetic diagnosis in trisomy 21.

CONCLUSION

Significant variability in prenatal counseling exists for trisomy 18. Indecision may be influenced by the genetic diagnosis, survival, and quality of life.

Для цитирования: Kosiv Katherine A, Wong Bob G, Anderson Rebecca A, Carey John C. Current prenatal counseling of congenital heart disease in trisomy 18, pediatric cardiologists' perspective: a Fetal Heart Society Research Collaborative Study.. Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02392-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.