Cerebral injury and neurodevelopmental impairment after amnioreduction versus laser surgery in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the odds of severe cerebral injury and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment in monochorionic twins treated with amnioreduction versus laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on cerebral injury and long-term impairment after amnioreduction versus laser surgery were conducted. Odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed.
RESULTS
Electronic and manual search identified 63 references. Five studies were included for analysis. We found an ample seven-fold higher risk of severe cerebral injury in live-born children treated with amnioreduction compared to laser (OR 7.69, 95% CI 2.78-20.0, p = 0.00). In children surviving the neonatal period, the odds were three-times higher following amnioreduction (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.45-7.14, p = 0.00). Although not significant, monochorionic twins treated with amnioreduction had higher odds of periventricular leukomalacia and intraventricular hemorrhage (OR 2.08, 95% CI 0.86-5.00, p = 0.10 and OR 3.56, 95% CI 0.82-14.29, p = 0.09). Unfortunately, there were insufficient long-term outcome data available to estimate the odds of neurodevelopmental impairment.
CONCLUSION
Amnioreduction is associated with an increased risk of severe cerebral injury compared to laser surgery in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Our study highlights a lack of studies focusing on long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. Follow-up into childhood is indispensable to determine outcome in terms of motor, cognitive and socioemotional development.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.