Sexual health · 2026
Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis in Canada: systematic review and meta-analysis, 1981-2025.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yousef Mahmoud, Rob Mlaak, Ageeb Rwedah A, El-Khoury Rayane, Harfouche Manale, Abu-Raddad Laith J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize evidence on Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in Canada, describe epidemiological patterns across populations and anatomical sites, and assess associations with prevalence.
METHODS: A systematic review of Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence studies was conducted and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects meta-analyses generated pooled mean prevalence estimates, and meta-regression analyses explored epidemiological and methodological predictors of prevalence variation.
RESULTS: A total of 169 publications were included, contributing 437 prevalence measures spanning 1981-2025. The pooled mean prevalence in the general population was 4.4% (95% CI: 3.6-5.2%) for current urogenital infection and 50.3% (95% CI: 44.5-56.1%) for ever infection. Among men who have sex with men and transgender people, prevalence estimates were 1.8% (95% CI: 0.6-3.5%) for urogenital infection, 6.6% (95% CI: 3.7-10.1%) for anorectal infection and 0.7% (95% CI: 0.0-2.1%) for oropharyngeal infection. Prevalence was substantially higher among symptomatic populations, reaching 18.6% (95% CI: 9.3-30.2%) in women and 24.3% (95% CI: 13.7-36.7%) in men. Meta-regression analyses explained >40% of the observed variation in prevalence, indicating that prevalence was approximately 30% lower among individuals aged ≥25 years compared with those aged <25 years, with no significant sex differences. Prevalence declined over time at a relative rate of 3% per year.
CONCLUSIONS: Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in Canada is comparable to global levels. The ongoing persistence of infection underscores the need to enhance public health responses and expand investment in vaccine development as a cornerstone of long-term prevention and control.
METHODS: A systematic review of Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence studies was conducted and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects meta-analyses generated pooled mean prevalence estimates, and meta-regression analyses explored epidemiological and methodological predictors of prevalence variation.
RESULTS: A total of 169 publications were included, contributing 437 prevalence measures spanning 1981-2025. The pooled mean prevalence in the general population was 4.4% (95% CI: 3.6-5.2%) for current urogenital infection and 50.3% (95% CI: 44.5-56.1%) for ever infection. Among men who have sex with men and transgender people, prevalence estimates were 1.8% (95% CI: 0.6-3.5%) for urogenital infection, 6.6% (95% CI: 3.7-10.1%) for anorectal infection and 0.7% (95% CI: 0.0-2.1%) for oropharyngeal infection. Prevalence was substantially higher among symptomatic populations, reaching 18.6% (95% CI: 9.3-30.2%) in women and 24.3% (95% CI: 13.7-36.7%) in men. Meta-regression analyses explained >40% of the observed variation in prevalence, indicating that prevalence was approximately 30% lower among individuals aged ≥25 years compared with those aged <25 years, with no significant sex differences. Prevalence declined over time at a relative rate of 3% per year.
CONCLUSIONS: Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in Canada is comparable to global levels. The ongoing persistence of infection underscores the need to enhance public health responses and expand investment in vaccine development as a cornerstone of long-term prevention and control.