[Interlaminar Distance and Bony Landmarks in Lumbar Neuraxial Anesthesia: A Concordance Study].
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Accurate identification of the puncture site in neuraxial anesthesia is essential. Accordingly, this study examines the concordance between interlaminar distance and bone landmark palpation in cases of difficult blockade.
OBJECTIVE
To reduce the risk of complications by enhancing the understanding of lumbar anatomy.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
A concordance study was conducted in 90 patients scheduled for neuraxial anesthesia, using bone landmark palpation and ultrasound measurement, with descriptive and inferential statistics applied through Cohen's Kappa coefficient.
RESULTS
The agreement between interlaminar distance and difficult blockade was κ = 0.565, p = 3.07×10⁻⁸; and between bone landmark palpation and difficult blockade was κ = 0.308, p = 0.00086. The odds ratio between difficult blockade and bone palpation was OR = 5.71 (95%CI: 1.93-16.93); for interlaminar distance and difficult blockade, the OR was 19.5 (95%CI: 5.85-65.00). The probability of encountering a difficult neuraxial blockade using the clinical technique was 80.77%, and with ultrasound guidance, it was 57.78%.
CONCLUSIONS
An interlaminar distance <1.38 cm and grades 3 or 4 show moderate agreement with difficult blockade. Grades 3 or 4 were associated with a 5.71-fold increased likelihood of encountering a difficult blockade, whereas an interlaminar distance <1.38 cm was associated with a 19.5-fold increase. Based on probability difference, the use of ultrasound prior to neuraxial blockade reduces the likelihood of technical difficulty by 22.99% compared to the traditional clinical technique.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.