MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.050

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of surgical research · 2016

Indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes of thoracic duct interventions in patients: a forgotten literature?

Wang Hsiang-Wei, Escott Alistair Brian James, Phang Kian Luke, Petrov Maxim S, Phillips Anthony Ronald John, Windsor John Albert

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The evolution of the "gut-lymph concept" has promoted thoracic duct (TD) lymph drainage as a possible treatment to reduce systemic inflammation and end-organ dysfunction in acute illness. The aim was to review the published experience of thoracic duct interventions (TDIs) aimed at improving clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A search of three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EMBASE CLASSIC) over the last 60 y. The indications for intervention, the technique, and clinical outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were a wide range of indications for TDI. These included reducing rejection after transplantation, treating inflammatory diseases, and reducing chronic failure of the liver, kidney, and heart. The techniques included TD cannulation and lymphovenuous fistula. The outcomes were variable and often equivocal, and this appears to reflect poor design quality. There is clinical equipoise regarding a therapeutic role of (TD lymph drainage in acute pancreatitis, and probably other acute diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Until well-designed clinical trials are undertaken, the clinical benefits of TDIs will remain promising, but uncertain.

Для цитирования: Wang Hsiang-Wei, Escott Alistair Brian James, Phang Kian Luke, Petrov Maxim S, Phillips Anthony Ronald John, Windsor John Albert. Indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes of thoracic duct interventions in patients: a forgotten literature?. The Journal of surgical research. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.050.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.