The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2021
Reproductive outcomes in women with mild intrauterine adhesions; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hooker Angelo B, Mansvelder Floor J, Elbers Roy G, Frijmersum Zayel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) may greatly impact fertility, predisposing to pregnancy and obstetric complications. The impact of mild IUAs on reproductive performance remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to examine the long-term reproductive outcomes in women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs mild intrauterine adhesions (IUAs).
METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to June 2019. All prospective cohort, cross-sectional studies or randomized controlled trials Clinical trials in which reproductive outcomes of women with mild IUAs, were reported were included.
RESULTS: Five studies, reporting on reproductive outcomes of 229 women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs, were included. The pregnancy rate was 62.3% (142 of 228; 95% CI: 0.55-0.72, I2 25%, p = .21) and in 86.6% (123 of 142) a live birth was encountered (95% CI: 0.71-0.97) with 83.1% (108 out of 130) term deliveries (95% CI: 0.53-0.95). A miscarriage was reported in 10% (13 of 130; 95% CI: 0.02-0.26). Due to the lack of a control group, reproductive outcomes were compared to a general population. Pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly lower in women with identified and treated mild IUAs, 90% versus 62.3% and respectively 99.5% versus 86.6%. The miscarriage rate was similar. Data on obstetric and neonatal outcomes are lacking.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs seem to have lower pregnancy and live birth rate compared to the general population. Future studies consisting of a large cohort of women with hysteroscopic identified and treated IUAs with structural follow-up and a control group are needed to confirm our findings.
METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to June 2019. All prospective cohort, cross-sectional studies or randomized controlled trials Clinical trials in which reproductive outcomes of women with mild IUAs, were reported were included.
RESULTS: Five studies, reporting on reproductive outcomes of 229 women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs, were included. The pregnancy rate was 62.3% (142 of 228; 95% CI: 0.55-0.72, I2 25%, p = .21) and in 86.6% (123 of 142) a live birth was encountered (95% CI: 0.71-0.97) with 83.1% (108 out of 130) term deliveries (95% CI: 0.53-0.95). A miscarriage was reported in 10% (13 of 130; 95% CI: 0.02-0.26). Due to the lack of a control group, reproductive outcomes were compared to a general population. Pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly lower in women with identified and treated mild IUAs, 90% versus 62.3% and respectively 99.5% versus 86.6%. The miscarriage rate was similar. Data on obstetric and neonatal outcomes are lacking.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs seem to have lower pregnancy and live birth rate compared to the general population. Future studies consisting of a large cohort of women with hysteroscopic identified and treated IUAs with structural follow-up and a control group are needed to confirm our findings.