DOI 10.1186/s13040-025-00515-z
Construction of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus based on 45 dietary nutrients.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using 45 dietary nutrients and baseline data.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3,649 pregnant women from the NHANES database (2007–2018). Baseline data (age, race/ethnicity, BMI, etc.) and 45 dietary nutrients were collected. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied after the train-test split to address class imbalance. Feature selection used Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) to reduce multicollinearity and the Boruta algorithm to identify core predictors. Six ML models (XGBoost, LightGBM, RF, SVM, GNB, KNN) were trained. Performance was evaluated via AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F-Beta score (β = 2), and PR-AUC. SHAP analysis clarified feature importance.
RESULTS
Core predictors included race/ethnicity, BMI, protein, dietary fiber, α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein/zeaxanthin, folate (DFE), calcium, phosphorus, zinc, potassium, alcohol intake, educational level, and smoking status. XGBoost performed best in the validation set (accuracy: 93.1%, F-Beta: 0.943, AUC: 0.966, sensitivity: 97.5%, specificity: 86.7%, PR-AUC: 0.967), followed by LightGBM (accuracy: 92.6%) and RF (accuracy: 91.4%). GNB was poorest (accuracy: 57.3%, AUC: 0.658). SHAP identified educational level, race/ethnicity, lycopene, and smoking status as top contributors.
CONCLUSION
ML models integrating demographics and 45 dietary nutrients accurately predict GDM. XGBoost, LightGBM, and RF excel, with XGBoost being most effective, supporting early GDM detection in clinical practice.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.