Machine Perfusion Ameliorates Nonanastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION

Machine perfusion (MP) technology may reduce the incidence of biliary complications (BCs) by reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of MP and static cold storage (SCS) on the incidence of BCs, nonanastomotic stricture (NAS), and anastomotic stricture (AS) after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of MP versus SCS on BCs, NAS, or AS after liver transplantation were included for the systematic review in October 2024. Random-effects models were used to perform pooled analyses to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 9 RCTs including 6 hypothermic oxygenate perfusion (HOPE) and 3 normothermic MP (NMP) were eligible for inclusion. Compared with SCS, MP technology seemed to reduce the incidence of BCs (HOPE: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.97, P = 0.03; NMP: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.00, P = 0.05). In addition, MP technology could explicitly reduce NAS incidence (HOPE: RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.84, P = 0.01; NMP: RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.83, P = 0.01). However, MP technology was likely unable to reduce the incidence of AS (HOPE: RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.63-1.26, P = 0.51; NMP: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.53-1.85, P = 0.99).

DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that MP technology could reduce the incidence of NAS, which might further lead to a reduction in the incidence of BCs. However, it did not seem to improve AS incidence.