MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3904/kjim.2010.25.2.147

Медицинская библиотека · The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2010

Characteristics of double-chambered right ventricle in adult patients.

Choi Yu Jeong, Park Seung Woo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study evaluated the clinical features of double-chambered right ventricle (DCRV) in adults. Most cases of DCRV are diagnosed and treated during childhood. Consequently, very few reports include cases in which its clinical characteristics are evident in adults.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data for 10 adult patients (age > or = 18 years) with DCRV.

RESULTS

Electrocardiogram showed right ventricular hypertrophy in 3 DCRV patients. All cases were associated with ventricular septal defect (VSD; 7 for perimembranous, 2 for muscular outlet, and 1 for the subarterial type). Surgical correction was done for 7 DCRV patients all of whom survived operations. Their follow-up echocardiogram showed the pressure gradient in their right ventricle was significantly decreased from 69.4 +/- 17.2 mmHg preoperatively to 10.2 +/- 5.0 mmHg postoperatively (p < 0.05). In the short-term follow-up, there was no significant increase in the pressure gradient in the right ventricle.

CONCLUSIONS

There are lots of cases of DCRV that are not diagnosed accurately in adults. In our experience, all DCRV cases had VSD and surgical correction of these cases showed excellent results. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of DCRV is necessary so that DCRV is not overlooked and operations are enabled within an appropriate time.

Для цитирования: Choi Yu Jeong, Park Seung Woo. Characteristics of double-chambered right ventricle in adult patients.. The Korean journal of internal medicine. 2010. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2010.25.2.147.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.