MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/2000656x.2016.1159218

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery · 2016

Retroauricular full-thickness skin grafts in syndactyly repair: outcome and comparison with inguinal full-thickness skin grafts: retrospective (cross-sectional) study.

Sulser Patrizia S, Kalisch Markus, Weber Daniel M

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Most surgeons recommend the use of full-thickness skin grafts for syndactyly repair. Common donor sites include the groin and elbow, but only one publication has previously mentioned retroauricular skin. No publication has compared the results for full-thickness skin grafts between retroauricular and other donor sites. This study aims at comparing functional and aesthetic outcomes and parents' satisfaction with retroauricular vs inguinal full-thickness skin grafts.

METHODS

Eleven children with retroauricular and 15 with inguinal full-thickness skin grafts were included in this retrospective study. Examination included the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, parent satisfaction, and a colour match measurement.

RESULTS

Both pigmentation match and parents' overall impression of the donor site were significantly better for retroauricular than for inguinal full-thickness skin grafts.

CONCLUSION

Due to the excellent pigmentation match and the inconspicuousness of the donor site, this study recommends the use of retroauricular full-thickness skin grafts for syndactyly repair.

Для цитирования: Sulser Patrizia S, Kalisch Markus, Weber Daniel M. Retroauricular full-thickness skin grafts in syndactyly repair: outcome and comparison with inguinal full-thickness skin grafts: retrospective (cross-sectional) study.. Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.3109/2000656x.2016.1159218.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.