Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2018
Surgical strategy for aortic arch reconstruction after the Norwood procedure based on numerical flow analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miyazaki Shohei, Miyaji Kagami, Itatani Keiichi, Oka Norihiko, Goto Shinji, Nakamura Masanori, Kitamura Tadashi, Horai Tetsuya, Sughimoto Koichi, Nakamura Yuki, Yoshimura Naoki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Inefficient aortic flow after the Norwood procedure is known to lead to the deterioration of ventricular function due to an increased cardiac workload. To prevent the progression of aortic arch obstruction, arch reconstruction concomitant with second-stage surgery is recommended. The aim of this study was to determine the indications for reconstruction based on numerical simulation and to reveal the morphology that affects the haemodynamic parameters.
METHODS: Fifteen patients who underwent the Norwood procedure or arch repair and Damus-Kaye-Stansel anastomosis were enrolled. The pressure gradient in aortic arch was 1.6 ± 3.9 mmHg (ranged from 0 to 12 mmHg) on catheter examination. Six patients who had prominent turbulent flow accompanied with a large flow energy loss index greater than 40 mW/m2 and high wall shear stress greater than 100 Pa underwent arch reconstruction.
RESULTS: After arch reconstruction, the energy loss index significantly decreased from 88.5 ± 50.0 mW/m2 to 23.1 ± 10.4 mW/m2 (P = 0.026) and wall shear stress significantly decreased from 194.5 ± 87.4 Pa to 60.3 ± 40.5 Pa (P = 0.0062). There were 3 late deaths due to heart failure caused by progressive atrioventricular valve regurgitation during the follow-up period (60 months). The systemic ventricular function was preserved in the remaining patients without any pressure gradients in the arch.
CONCLUSIONS: Determining the surgical strategy for arch reconstruction based on numerical flow analysis may effectively reduce the ventricular load even if no stenosis or pressure gradients are observed on catheter examination or echocardiography.
METHODS: Fifteen patients who underwent the Norwood procedure or arch repair and Damus-Kaye-Stansel anastomosis were enrolled. The pressure gradient in aortic arch was 1.6 ± 3.9 mmHg (ranged from 0 to 12 mmHg) on catheter examination. Six patients who had prominent turbulent flow accompanied with a large flow energy loss index greater than 40 mW/m2 and high wall shear stress greater than 100 Pa underwent arch reconstruction.
RESULTS: After arch reconstruction, the energy loss index significantly decreased from 88.5 ± 50.0 mW/m2 to 23.1 ± 10.4 mW/m2 (P = 0.026) and wall shear stress significantly decreased from 194.5 ± 87.4 Pa to 60.3 ± 40.5 Pa (P = 0.0062). There were 3 late deaths due to heart failure caused by progressive atrioventricular valve regurgitation during the follow-up period (60 months). The systemic ventricular function was preserved in the remaining patients without any pressure gradients in the arch.
CONCLUSIONS: Determining the surgical strategy for arch reconstruction based on numerical flow analysis may effectively reduce the ventricular load even if no stenosis or pressure gradients are observed on catheter examination or echocardiography.