Drug design, development and therapy · 2026
Clinical Evaluation of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on the 2nd Edition of China's Drug Evaluation and Selection Guideline.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Zhijun, Zhang Yunhui, Chen Haoyun, Dong Xinyi, Lei Weicheng, Zhong Luhua, Yang Jiali, Huang Huanjun, Chen Zhuojia, Liang Weiting
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To provide a reference for healthcare organizations in the selection and rational use of ALK inhibitors, based on A Quick Guideline for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (the Second Edition).
METHODS: According to the 2nd edition of China's drug evaluation and selection guideline released in 2023, relevant databases such as PubMed, Micromedex, and Medlive, drug labels, and clinical guidelines were searched for specific drug information. We systematically evaluated eight ALK inhibitors marketed in China for pharmacological properties, efficacy, safety, economy, and other attributes using a percentage scoring method.
RESULTS: The ranking of ALK inhibitors was derived from a structured scoring framework based on the 2nd Edition of China's Drug Evaluation and Selection Guideline. The final assessment result scores from highest to lowest were alectinib (78.70 points), lorlatinib (78.70 points), brigatinib (78.50 points), ensartinib (73.30 points), iruplinalkib (72.55 points), ceritinib (71.50 points), envonalkib (71.15 points), crizotinib (70.60 points).
CONCLUSION: Based on the second edition of China's drug evaluation and selection guideline and combined with the clinical application characteristics of ALK inhibitors, this study performed a multidimensional scoring of eight ALK inhibitors. The evaluation results could provide a reference for medical institutions in the introduction and elimination of ALK inhibitors.
METHODS: According to the 2nd edition of China's drug evaluation and selection guideline released in 2023, relevant databases such as PubMed, Micromedex, and Medlive, drug labels, and clinical guidelines were searched for specific drug information. We systematically evaluated eight ALK inhibitors marketed in China for pharmacological properties, efficacy, safety, economy, and other attributes using a percentage scoring method.
RESULTS: The ranking of ALK inhibitors was derived from a structured scoring framework based on the 2nd Edition of China's Drug Evaluation and Selection Guideline. The final assessment result scores from highest to lowest were alectinib (78.70 points), lorlatinib (78.70 points), brigatinib (78.50 points), ensartinib (73.30 points), iruplinalkib (72.55 points), ceritinib (71.50 points), envonalkib (71.15 points), crizotinib (70.60 points).
CONCLUSION: Based on the second edition of China's drug evaluation and selection guideline and combined with the clinical application characteristics of ALK inhibitors, this study performed a multidimensional scoring of eight ALK inhibitors. The evaluation results could provide a reference for medical institutions in the introduction and elimination of ALK inhibitors.