MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13256-022-03579-1

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical case reports · 2022

5p deletion with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a case report.

Kotani Tomomi, Ushida Takafumi, Nakamura Noriyuki, Imai Kenji, Iitani Yukako, Tano Sho, Iwagaki Shigenori, Takahashi Yuichiro, Ito Miharu, Hayakawa Masahiro, Kajiyama Hiroaki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

5p deletion syndrome is known as cri-du-chat syndrome, but there are no reports on congenital diaphragmatic hernia complications associated with it.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old primigravida Japanese woman was referred for 5 mm of nuchal translucency. Fetal growth restriction was found at 20 weeks, and a left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia was diagnosed at 24 weeks. The karyotype of the fetus was diagnosed as 46, XX, del(5)(p14) and referred to our hospital. At 36 + 6 weeks, a 1524 g female infant was delivered after premature membrane rupture, with Apgar scores of 4 and 6 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. The baby was intubated immediately with sedation and muscle relaxation, after birth for initial treatment for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The peripheral blood karyotype was consistent with the prenatal result. The infant was discharged alive, without any respiratory support, after the defect of the diaphragm was repaired.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study may be helpful for antenatal genetic counseling.

Для цитирования: Kotani Tomomi, Ushida Takafumi, Nakamura Noriyuki, Imai Kenji, Iitani Yukako, Tano Sho, Iwagaki Shigenori, Takahashi Yuichiro, Ito Miharu, Hayakawa Masahiro, Kajiyama Hiroaki. 5p deletion with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a case report.. Journal of medical case reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-022-03579-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.