The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
Operative versus conservative management for 'fetal distress' in labour.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hofmeyr G J, Kulier R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Suspected fetal distress usually results in expedited delivery of a baby (often operatively). The potential harm to a mother and baby from operative delivery may not always be justified especially when fetal distress may be misdiagnosed. Even with a correct diagnosis it is not clear whether an operative or conservative approach is better.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of operative management for fetal distress on maternal and perinatal morbidity.
SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: October 1997.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of operative (caesarean section or expedited vaginal delivery) versus conservative management of suspected fetal distress.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality assessment and data extraction were done by both reviewers.
MAIN RESULTS: One study of 350 women was included. This trial was carried out in 1959. There was no difference in perinatal mortality (relative risk 1.18, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 2.48).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There have been no contemporary trials of operative versus conservative management of suspected fetal distress. In settings without modern obstetric facilities, a policy of operative delivery in the event of meconium-stained liquor or fetal heart rate changes has not been shown to reduce perinatal mortality.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of operative management for fetal distress on maternal and perinatal morbidity.
SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: October 1997.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of operative (caesarean section or expedited vaginal delivery) versus conservative management of suspected fetal distress.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality assessment and data extraction were done by both reviewers.
MAIN RESULTS: One study of 350 women was included. This trial was carried out in 1959. There was no difference in perinatal mortality (relative risk 1.18, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 2.48).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There have been no contemporary trials of operative versus conservative management of suspected fetal distress. In settings without modern obstetric facilities, a policy of operative delivery in the event of meconium-stained liquor or fetal heart rate changes has not been shown to reduce perinatal mortality.