MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bcr-2020-236475

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ case reports · 2021

Flaps in adult urethrocutaneous fistula repair: a report of two cases with the review of literature.

Bokka Sri Harsha, Kodakkattil Sreenivasan Sreerag, Mehra Ketan, Meethale Thiruvoth Friji

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) poses a challenge to the reconstructive urologist in terms of its location, patient's expectations, availability of tissues for interposition, wound infection and chances of recurrence. Also, patient-related factors, such as uncontrolled diabetes, local surgery with extensive tissue loss, prior history of radiation, poor nutritional status and presence of any distal obstruction in the urethra severely affect the outcomes of a good repair with vascularised flap. We report two cases of UCF repair in adults using scrotal and gracilis muscle flaps (GMFs), their anatomic basis, technicality and advantages. The scrotal flap was used in the first case where it was freely available and GMF in second case where the patient had already undergone extensive local tissue debridement for Fournier's gangrene and hence, we had to look for a distant flap for protection of the UCF repair. Both patients had an uneventful recovery, there were no early or late treatment-related complications and follow-up after the third and sixth month of surgery revealed no recurrence and the patients are voiding well.

Для цитирования: Bokka Sri Harsha, Kodakkattil Sreenivasan Sreerag, Mehra Ketan, Meethale Thiruvoth Friji. Flaps in adult urethrocutaneous fistula repair: a report of two cases with the review of literature.. BMJ case reports. 2021. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-236475.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.