m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026

Algae-Derived Bioactive Compounds as Platforms for Translational Biotechnology and Health Applications.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Morris H, Coombes Z, El Dor Z, Rodrigues VJ, Silkina A, Marchese P, Murphy M, Adams JMM, Barry F, Fuentes-Grünewald C, Rachidi W, Gonzalez D

Аннотация

Marine macroalgae, microalgae, and associated microorganisms are increasingly recognised as valuable sources of bioactive compounds with applications across biotechnology and health. The environmental and ecological conditions they inhabit shape their metabolite diversity, leading to the production of high-value compounds such as sulphated polysaccharides, lipids, pigments, phenolics, and peptides. These compounds exhibit conserved biological activities that underpin potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, and pro-regenerative effects with strong potential for translation. Although external factors drive rich metabolite diversity, continual variation can also lead to translational constraints including heavy-metal accumulation, inconsistency in extract composition, and regulatory complexity. This review examines the environmental drivers of metabolite diversity and the functional potential of bioactives derived from marine algae. We focus on their translational application within four areas of growing interest: nutraceuticals, cosmetics, regenerative medicine, and oncology, where emerging evidence suggests their promise as next-generation bioactive ingredients and therapeutic leads. In addition, insights from Irish and Welsh Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are collated to identify key bottlenecks in commercialisation and the requirements for effective marine biodiscovery pipelines. We consider the importance of controlled cultivation, standardised analytics, preclinical testing platforms, and collaborative innovation ecosystems and highlight the need for coordinated scientific, technical, and regulatory advances to unlock the full translational potential of marine-derived compounds.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license .

1. Introduction

Marine ecosystems cover approximately 70% of the Earth’s surface and host one of the most diverse and highly adaptive collections of organisms on the planet, forming a major reservoir of novel bioactive molecules with significant cosmetic, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and biotechnological potential [ 1 ]. Marine biodiscovery efforts are increasingly focused on microorganisms and primary producers—particularly microalgae (including cyanobacteria), macroalgae (seaweeds), marine bacteria and fungi. These groups exhibit unique metabolic capabilities shaped by long-term adaptation to fluctuating environmental pressures such as light intensity, temperature variation, salinity gradients, and biotic interactions [ 2 , 3 ]. These adaptive pressures drive the synthesis of structurally diverse metabolites, including pigments, polysaccharides, fatty acids, sterols, peptides, and secondary metabolites, many of which have already demonstrated relevance to human health and biotechnology [ 4 , 5 , 6 ].

Microalgae are unicellular photosynthetic organisms that inhabit a wide range of marine and brackish environments, contributing extensively to global primary productivity while producing high-value biomolecules with therapeutic, nutritional, and industrial potential [ 4 , 6 , 7 ]. Macroalgae similarly experience persistent abiotic and biotic stressors such as fluctuating UV exposure, temperature shifts, salinity changes, herbivory, and pathogenic attack. These stressors shape their metabolite profiles and promote the evolution of chemical defence molecules, photoprotective pigments, and antioxidant systems [ 8 ]. The ecological functions of these metabolites frequently align with human application areas, providing a translational bridge between marine chemical ecology and biotechnology.

Reflecting this emerging landscape, we highlight four major domains where marine-derived bioactives offer particularly strong translational potential: nutraceuticals and food security, skin biology and cosmetics, regenerative medicine, and anticancer therapeutics. These domains represent high-growth sectors with clear unmet needs that marine metabolites are well positioned to address due to their structural novelty, multi-target modes of action, and potential scalability [ 2 , 7 , 9 ]. Each domain is receiving increasing attention as biotechnological advances improve compound isolation, characterisation, and functional evaluation, enabling more direct alignment between discovery and end use.

A key strength of marine biodiscovery lies in its potential sustainability. Microalgal biomass, for example, can be produced in controlled cultivation systems that minimise environmental footprint while enabling the optimisation of specific metabolite pathways [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Macroalgal harvesting and aquaculture likewise can support the renewable, low-impact and regenerative sourcing of bioactive compounds [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. The intersection of sustainability, biochemical diversity, and translational relevance is increasingly framed within circular, blue- and bio-economy approaches, catalysing a shift from purely exploratory natural-product research toward application-driven biodiscovery in which mechanistic understanding is tightly coupled with real-world deployment and full-value utilisation of marine biomass [ 11 , 14 , 16 ] ( Figure 1 ).

We aim to build on this foundation by: Identifying the major algae-related sources of bioactive compounds; Discussing the ecological and biochemical drivers of metabolite diversity; Reviewing the principal functional classes of marine algae-derived bioactives; Mapping the relevance of the principle functional classes to the four translational domains outlined above.

This integrated review combines ecological, biochemical, and application-focused perspectives, positioning marine biodiscovery as a versatile and sustainable platform capable of generating impactful innovations across health, nutrition, regenerative medicine, and oncology.

2. Marine Biodiscovery and Bioactive Sources

In their natural environment, marine macro- and microalgae are continually exposed to a wide spectrum of fluctuating abiotic pressures, including shifts in light intensity, oxidative temperature and salinity stress [ 4 ], and biotic challenges such as grazing by marine herbivores and pathogenic attacks. These environmental pressures, ecological interactions, and evolutionary metabolic adaptations collectively influence their distinctive metabolic profiles [ 5 ], stimulating the synthesis of protective and regulatory metabolites, such as pigments, fatty acids, protective exopolysaccharides and others, many of which exhibit bioactive properties relevant to human health and biotechnology [ 6 ].

2.1. Drivers of Bioactive Compound Diversity

2.1.1. Light and Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation

Several key classes of metabolites in macroalgae are influenced by light, primarily those involved in photosynthesis, photoprotection and stress tolerance such as photosynthetic pigments and phenolic compounds. The wavelength of visible light is known to influence the production of photosynthetic pigments [ 17 ], with changes in light intensity or spectrum frequency altering the metabolic activity in aquaculture systems, while environmental light availability significantly influences the synthesis of phenolic compounds involved in antioxidant and protective functions [ 8 ]. Extracts from macroalgae exposed to high UV-light levels have been shown to demonstrate higher antioxidant activity compared to those obtained under lower exposure conditions, through either a higher phenolic content or a synergistic effect between phenolics and other metabolites [ 18 ]. Photosynthetic pigments from macroalgae, primarily carotenoids such as fucoxanthin and astaxanthin; phycobiliproteins; and chlorophyll derivatives, have demonstrated strong antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, anticancer, antimicrobial, and photoprotective activities [ 9 , 19 ].

Several key classes of metabolites in microalgae are similarly influenced by light, particularly those associated with photosynthesis, photoprotection, and cellular stress responses, including photosynthetic pigments and phenolic compounds. The wavelength and intensity of visible light strongly regulate pigment biosynthesis in microalgae, with the spectral quality (e.g., blue, red, or green light) affecting the accumulation of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and phycobiliproteins through the modulation of photosynthetic efficiency and light-harvesting systems. Variations in light intensity and photoperiod can significantly alter metabolic fluxes in microalgal cultures, impacting both biomass productivity and the synthesis of high-value metabolites [ 12 ].

Light availability also plays a crucial role in the production of phenolic compounds and other antioxidant molecules in microalgae, which are involved in protection against oxidative stress. Exposure to elevated light intensities or UV radiation induces the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), triggering adaptive responses that enhance the accumulation of antioxidant compounds, including phenolics, carotenoids (e.g., β-carotene, lutein, astaxanthin), and mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) [ 20 ]. Similarly to macroalgae, increased UV exposure in microalgae has been associated with enhanced antioxidant activity of extracts, either due to higher phenolic content or synergistic interactions between multiple bioactive compounds.

Photosynthetic pigments in microalgae—including chlorophylls (a and b), carotenoids (such as β-carotene, lutein, and astaxanthin), and phycobiliproteins (e.g., phycocyanin and phycoerythrin)—are widely recognised for their diverse bioactivities [ 21 ]. These compounds exhibit strong antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antimicrobial, neuroprotective, and photoprotective properties, making microalgae a highly promising and scalable source of functional ingredients for applications in nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food systems.

2.1.2. Temperature Fluctuations

In intertidal macroalgae, temperature is an abiotic stressor that activates chemical defence pathways and stimulates the production of secondary metabolites as adaptive responses to dynamic, and often harsh, environmental conditions [ 22 ]. In a study on the green macroalgae Halimeda macroloba , key physiological and biochemical pathways were reshaped by altered temperature conditions. In sub-optimal 25 °C conditions, reduced photosynthetic performance was accompanied by increases in oleic acid to maintain membrane fluidity and a significant accumulation of selenocysteine, selenomethionine, and related selenoproteins to help counteract low-temperature-induced oxidative stress. In optimal 28 °C conditions, photosynthetic efficiency, calcium content, and general metabolic performance peak, reflecting a stable metabolic state. In contrast, 31 °C triggers heat-responsive shifts, including the upregulation of proteins involved in photosynthesis and an accumulation of mannitol, acting as an antioxidant against environmental stress [ 23 ]. In subtidal kelps, mannitol levels also rise markedly during the summer months [ 24 ], though in deeper waters the temperature change is less marked and this is more likely due to the to increased light length and intensity during this period.

Extremophile microalgae such as the red algae Galdieria sulphuraria and Cyanidioschyzon merolae have received increasing scientific and industrial/commercial attention due to their poly-extreme natural adaptation to high temperatures > 45 °C and low pH levels < 4, making them particularly ideal candidates for industrial applications where pH and temperature stability in different processes is required [ 10 , 25 ].

2.1.3. Salinity Changes

Salinity can influence metabolite production in macroalgae, particularly in relation to phenolic compounds. Most studies on Phaeophyceae report salinity shifts either suppressing or enhancing phenolic levels depending on species tolerance: tolerant Phaeophyceae maintain high phenolic content under hypersaline conditions, while others show reduced phenolics and antioxidant activity when exposed to elevated salinity [ 26 ]. Salinity has also been shown to strongly drive mannitol production in Fucus vesiculosus , with marine ecotypes containing more mannitol than those growing in lower salinity estuarine environments [ 27 ]. Furthermore, both ecotypes are able to adjust to reach the mannitol concentration of the other when placed in the alternative environment if light is also provided to enable photosynthesis and support long-term osmotic adjustment [ 27 ]. Additionally, decreases in the protein concentrations of red ( Gracilaria spp.) and brown ( Sargassum spp.) macroalgae have been associated with salinity increases [ 28 ].

Under increased salinity, microalgae maintain osmotic balance by accumulating compatible solutes (osmolytes) such as glycerol, glycine betaine, proline, and soluble sugars. A well-documented example is Dunaliella salina , which can accumulate high intracellular concentrations of glycerol (up to 50–60% of cell dry weight under hypersaline conditions), enabling survival in extreme salinity while maintaining photosynthetic activity [ 29 ]. This osmotic adjustment is often accompanied by significant shifts in carbon partitioning.

Salinity stress also enhances the accumulation of lipids, particularly neutral lipids (triacylglycerols, TAGs), as part of an energy storage and stress mitigation strategy. For instance, Chlorella vulgaris [ 30 ] and Nannochloropisis salina [ 31 ] have been shown to increase lipid content under elevated salinity, with reported increases of up to 1.5–2-fold depending on cultivation conditions. Similarly, salinity-induced oxidative stress promotes the synthesis of carotenoids, which play a protective role against reactive oxygen species (ROS). In Dunaliella salina , β-carotene accumulation can exceed 10% of dry biomass under high salinity and light stress [ 32 ].

2.1.4. Grazing by Marine Herbivores

Macroalgae function within complex ecological networks where many of their secondary metabolites play key roles in defence, signalling, and interactions with other organisms. Herbivory from common marine grazers such as fish, sea urchins, amphipods, and molluscs has driven the evolution of diverse chemical defence strategies. These include the production of deterrent metabolites providing strong chemical unpalatability across Rhodophyta species, for example in Plocamium spp. which produce diverse mixtures of halogenated monoterpenes [ 33 ]. Halogenated monoterpenes have been known to exhibit significant biological activity such as anticancer, anti-plasmodial, and insecticidal qualities, with higher halogen proportions and their position within the monoterpene skeleton impacting their properties [ 34 ]. Within Phaeophyceae, a study on Dictyota menstrualis exhibited clear inducible chemical defences in response to grazing by the amphipod Ampithoe longimana through rapid increases in diterpenoids, resulting in reduced palatability and lower subsequent grazing, with concentrations often localised within damaged tissues. Diterpenoids exhibit a wide range of biological activities, functioning as potent antioxidants, demonstrating significant anti-inflammatory properties, and contributing to the modulation of immune responses [ 35 ].

2.1.5. Microbial Pathogens

When exposed to bacteria, fungi, or competing algae through pathogenic attack, macroalgae synthesise diverse antimicrobial compounds including terpenoids, phenolics, polysaccharides, and halogenated metabolites which inhibit pathogen growth, damage cell walls, or disrupt membrane integrity [ 36 ]. Many of these compounds, such as sargafuran from Phaeophyceae Sargassum macrocarpum ; or peyssonoic acids from Rhodophyta Peyssonnelia sp., act by lysing microbial cells or blocking key metabolic processes [ 36 , 37 ]. In Rhodophyta Ceramium rubrum , mixed extracts show strong antimicrobial activity compared to purified individual compounds, suggesting that macroalgae are employing complex chemical cocktails rather than single metabolites for defence [ 38 ].

Antifouling compounds range from fatty acids and terpenoids to alkaloids, pyrroles, and lipopeptides; inhibiting microbial attachment, disrupting quorum-sensing pathways, and preventing settlement of larger fouling organisms [ 39 ]. Additional metabolites such as phlorotannins, sulphated polysaccharides, carotenoids, and fatty acids can interfere with cell signalling, suppress biofilm formation, or disrupt extracellular polymeric substances, further enhancing resistance to colonisation [ 40 ]. Together, these chemical defences form a sophisticated antifouling system that contributes to the surface integrity and ecological success of marine macroalgae, with many potential applications across medicine, agriculture, food systems, aquaculture and environmental management.

Although not discussed at length in this review, it is important to highlight that marine microorganisms themselves similarly produce a wide spectrum of secondary metabolites that function as ecological defence molecules or signalling compounds. Collectively, marine microalgae and associated microorganisms contribute substantially to the diversity of marine-derived natural products currently being explored for biomedical applications [ 7 ]. For example, microalgal species Porphyridium purpureum produces sulphated polysaccharides that act as defence molecules, boasting antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties [ 12 ].

3. Functional Classes of Marine Bioactive Compounds

Both micro- and macroalgae produce numerous classes of bioactive molecules with essential roles in defence, signalling, metabolism, and maintaining cellular and structural integrity. Because these molecules frequently display potent biological activities, algae have emerged as rich reservoirs with demonstrated biomedical relevance [ 41 ].

3.1. Lipids and Lipid-Derived Mediators

3.1.1. Lipids and Lipid-Derived Mediators in Macroalgae

Macroalgae possess highly distinctive lipid profiles comprising polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), PUFA derivatives, membrane-associated glycolipids, phospholipids and non-phosphorous glycerolipids [ 42 ]. Chlorophyta typically show lower levels of long-chain PUFAs compared with Rhodophyta and Phaeophyceae samples, which have relatively high levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA); but all exhibit low n-6:n-3 ratios, indicating strong potential for use in health-promoting and sustainable nutritional applications [ 43 ].

Macroalgae also produce a rich suite of oxylipins and eicosanoids, oxygenated derivatives of polyunsaturated fatty acids that act as key chemical mediators in both defence and signalling. These compounds include prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and hydroxy and hydroperoxy fatty acids, many of which closely resemble the eicosanoids found in mammals [ 44 ]. Studies show that macroalgal oxylipins participate in stress signalling, innate immunity and chemical defence, often deterring herbivores, pathogens, or fouling organisms. They also display promising pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects, with prostaglandins and hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid being potentially suitable as valuable tools for drug discovery and biomedical research [ 45 ]. Glycolipids within macroalgae cell membranes include monogalactosyldiacylglycerides (MGDGs), digalactosyldiacylglycerides (DGDGs), and sulfolipids such as sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerides (SQDGs), which all exhibit broad bioactivity, notably antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antitumor effects [ 46 ].

Macroalgae are also rich in unique sterols, with fucosterol, a predominant sterol in Phaeophyceae, showing diverse bioactivities including antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, anti-obesity, and anticancer effects [ 47 ]. Due to this chemical diversity and the structural novelty of marine-derived lipids, macroalgal lipids are increasingly recognised as high-value targets in marine pharmacology, with significant potential for nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and therapeutic development.

3.1.2. Lipids and Lipid-Derived Mediators in Microalgae

Microalgae are important sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), including eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), which play essential roles in cardiovascular health, inflammation regulation, and neural development. EPA is abundantly produced by microalgae such as Nannochloropsis oceanica and Phaeodactylum tricornutum , while DHA is particularly associated with species such as Schizochytrium sp. and Crypthecodinium cohnii [ 48 ]. These fatty acids are widely used in nutraceutical formulations and infant nutrition products due to their established physiological benefits. In addition to structural lipids, microalgae produce lipid-derived signalling molecules such as oxylipins, which have demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and immunomodulatory activities [ 49 ]. Exploring fatty acids, especially PUFAs, in new biotechnological microalgae platforms is important; the Dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae , for example, has been identified as a promising source of different lipids with a range of applications in the pharmaceutical industry [ 50 ].

3.2. Polysaccharides and Glycoconjugates

3.2.1. Polysaccharides and Glycoconjugates in Macroalgae

All macroalgae are prolific producers of structurally diverse polysaccharides that exhibit unique biological properties. These polysaccharides vary in monosaccharide composition, sulphation patterns, and branching, resulting in a wide range of functional and biomedical applications [ 51 ].

Alginate is found in Phaeophyceae and consists of a linear copolymer of β-D-mannuronic and α-L-guluronic acids that forms a hydrogel through ionic crosslinking with Ca 2+ , enabling broad biomedical use [ 52 ]. Reviews highlight alginate’s biocompatibility, biodegradability, and physicochemical properties, supporting applications in wound dressings, drug delivery, tissue engineering, and 3D bioprinting. Alginate-based nanofibers and nanoparticles further improve targeted delivery and regenerative applications, expanding its role as a versatile marine-derived biopolymer [ 53 , 54 ].

Sulphated polysaccharides exhibit important pharmacological properties including antioxidant, anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and anticancer effects which are linked to their molecular weight, sulphate content, and sugar composition [ 55 ]. Several studies highlight the ability of these molecules to inhibit cancer cell growth and act similarly to heparin in anticoagulation [ 56 , 57 , 58 ]. In agriculture, macroalgal-derived polysaccharides function as sustainable biostimulants that enhance plant growth through enhanced establishment and yield and improve tolerance to abiotic stresses such as salinity by regulating nutrient uptake and acting as signalling molecules [ 59 ].

Fucoidan, a sulphated polysaccharide rich in L-fucose and sulphate groups, also contributes significant therapeutic potential. Its anticoagulant activity is strongly influenced by its molecular weight and degree of sulphation, with studies demonstrating potent heparin-like effects [ 60 ]. Fucoidan exhibits antiviral properties, including inhibition of HSV-1, and broader anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and immunomodulatory effects driven by structure–activity relationships tied to sulphate content and monosaccharide composition [ 61 ].

Carrageenans are linear sulphated galactans typically occurring in kappa, iota and lambda forms, each defined by distinct sulphation patterns that shape their gelling behaviour and broad functionality [ 51 ]. Carrageenan-based hydrogels show strong water absorption, negative charge, and readily modifiable functional groups, supporting their use in drug delivery, wound healing, and tissue engineering. Beyond these applications, carrageenans are widely employed in pharmaceutical formulations, environmental remediation, and bio-nanocomposites due to their gel-forming and stabilising capacities, with chemically modified and hybrid platforms further enhancing mechanical performance and biological functionality [ 62 ].

Specific Rhodophyta contain agar and its component agarose [ 63 ], which are derived from species such as Gracilaria edulis and serve as key gelling and stabilising agents with applications in microbial culturing, pharmaceuticals, and agriculture, while their bioactive derivatives exhibit antioxidant and other health-relevant properties [ 64 ].

Chlorophyta produce several bioactive polysaccharides, with ulvan, a sulphated heteropolysaccharide composed mainly of rhamnose, xylose, glucuronic acid, and iduronic acid, being the most prominent [ 65 ]. Ulvan exhibits a broad spectrum of antioxidant, anticancer, immunomodulatory, and antiviral activities, making it an increasingly popular candidate in biomedical research. Its structural resemblance to mammalian glycosaminoglycans enables effective integration into hybrid biomaterials for drug delivery and wound repair [ 66 ]. Beyond ulvan, green macroalgae also contain additional functional polysaccharides such as cellulose, xyloglucan, and glucuronan which contribute to additional prebiotic, structural, and bioactive properties. Together, these green-seaweed-derived polysaccharides are increasingly recognised for their potential in designing biocompatible, sustainable, and multifunctional biomaterials for future biomedical and biotechnological applications [ 66 , 67 ].

Macroalgae also produce a wide spectrum of bioactive glycoconjugates, including structurally diverse glycolipids such as monogalactosyldiacylglycerols, digalactosyldiacylglycerols, and sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerols, which function as membrane-associated amphiphilic molecules with roles in antioxidant, antiviral, immunomodulatory, and pharmaceutical applications [ 46 , 68 , 69 ]. In addition, macroalgae contain glycoproteins, such as lectin and structural cell-wall glycoproteins, many of which exhibit antimicrobial, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, and other health-promoting activities [ 70 , 71 ]. Collectively, these glycolipid and glycoprotein glycoconjugates contribute to macroalgae’s growing value as a source of functional biomolecules with applications in nutrition, therapeutics, and biomaterial development.

3.2.2. Polysaccharides and Glycoconjugates in Microalgae

As with macroalgae, extracellular polysaccharides and sulphated polysaccharides produced by marine microalgae have attracted attention due to their biological activities, including their antioxidant, antiviral, anticoagulant, and immunomodulatory effects [ 72 ].

Species such as Porphyridium purpureum produce sulphated exopolysaccharides rich in xylose, glucose, and galactose residues that exhibit antiviral activity against enveloped viruses and potential anti-inflammatory effects [ 21 ]. These polymers also possess rheological properties that make them attractive for pharmaceutical formulations, cosmetics, and biomedical materials. Other red microalgae, including Porphyridium cruentum , produce similar sulphated polysaccharides that have demonstrated anticoagulant activity comparable to heparin in some in vitro systems [ 73 ]. Leptolyngbya sp. produce bioactive extracellular polymers composed mainly of rhamnose, arabinose, mannose and glucose; all of these sugar monomers have shown significant antimicrobial activity against the fungi Aspergillus niger and anti-proliferative effects against cancer cells [ 74 ].

3.3. Pigments and Phenolic Compounds

3.3.1. Pigments and Phenolic Compounds in Macroalgae

Pigmented metabolites from macroalgae have frequently been shown to exhibit anticancer, antioxidant and antibacterial properties, occurring as three main forms: chlorophylls, carotenoids and phycobiliproteins [ 34 ]. Chlorophylls are non-polar green pigments which play a pivotal role in photosynthesis, as sunlight capture or accessory pigments [ 75 ]. Carotenoids are red, orange or yellow; and act as accessory pigments which transport the energy to chlorophylls and protect against photooxidative damage [ 34 ]; and are classified into two depending on their molecular structure, with xanthophylls containing oxygen atoms in their structure and hydrocarbon carotenes without [ 76 ]. Within the xanthophylls, astaxanthin and fucoxanthin are significant molecules and these have been singled out for pharmacological interest. Being antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective, they have the potential as candidates for chronic disease prevention or treatment, especially for neurodegenerative diseases [ 77 ] and ocular function [ 78 ]; fucoxanthin has also been identified as a functional food ingredient which can reduce diabetes and obesity risks [ 76 ].

Phycobiliproteins, appearing purple and blue [ 75 ], include phycoerythrin and phycocyanin, and constitute up to 8% dry weight of red algae composition. With their antioxidant and high absorbance properties they are widely used in biomedical and pharmaceutical sectors [ 76 ]. Collectively, with an interest in natural dyes and colours, these pigments have the potential to positively impact health whilst being used as colour additives.

Phlorotannins are found within vesicles in the cytoplasm of Phaeophyceae cells [ 79 ] and are oligomers or polymers of the phenol-based molecule phloroglucinol [ 80 ]. Though research on these molecules is still limited, several have been isolated, characterised and shown to exhibit potent antioxidant effects [ 79 ].

3.3.2. Pigments and Phenolic Compounds in Microalgae

Marine microalgae synthesise a variety of pigments including carotenoids, chlorophyll derivatives, and phycobiliproteins, many of which exhibit strong antioxidant and photoprotective properties [ 81 ]. Astaxanthin, produced by Haematococcus pluvialis , is one of the most powerful known natural antioxidants and is widely used in nutraceutical and cosmetic applications. Fucoxanthin, abundant in diatoms such as Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Odontella aurita , has demonstrated anti-obesity, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties [ 82 ]. Cyanobacterial pigments such as phycocyanin, produced by Arthrospira platensis (Spirulina), exhibit antioxidant, hepatoprotective, and neuroprotective activities and are increasingly explored as natural therapeutic agents.

The new species Monoraphidium sp. produce a range of carotenoids including astaxanthin, violaxanthin, and lutein, among others; all of these pigments have well-known pharmaceutical potential as natural antioxidants, providing eye health effects or anticancer activity [ 83 ]. In the case of extremophile microalgae species such as Galdieria or Cyanidioschyzon , pigment extraction (especially phycobiliproteins) is of interest due to its simple and sustainable extraction process (combination of micro- and ultrafiltration using water as the main extractor carrier) and potential (in the case of Phycocyanin ) use in industrial applications that require thermostable pigments [ 10 ].

3.4. Peptides and Secondary Metabolites

3.4.1. Peptides and Secondary Metabolites in Macroalgae

The protein fractions within macroalgae differ by taxonomy, with Rhodophyta and Chlorophyta typically containing more protein (10.2–22.7 and 10.7–25.9%, respectively) than Phaeophyceae (1.1–26.8%), though large variation is seen for all types [ 52 ]. Within the category of proteins, macroalgae contain peptides, glycoproteins, mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs), lectins, and enzymes, and within Rhodophyta, phycobiliproteins (as discussed in Section 3.3.1 on pigments).

Macroalgae bioactive peptides can be released using a range of processes including enzymic hydrolysis, acid, alkaline or hot water extractions, or fermentation—though enzymic hydrolysis is the most common [ 84 ]. Through hydrolysis, peptides 3–20 amino acids in length with bioactive properties are produced, showing anticancer, antioxidant and antithrombosis properties [ 79 ], with their biofunctionalities typically dictated by their amino acid sequence within the parent protein and their composition [ 85 ]. Macroalgae-derived peptides include those proven to reduce hypertension sold as Ameal-S 120 ® , produced by Calpis Company, Tokyo, Japan, and Evolus ® by Valio Ltd., Helsinki, Finland [ 86 ].

MAAs are considered important antioxidants in Rhodophyta and are able to absorb UV-B radiation, giving them high potential as bioactive ingredients in sun-protective creams [ 85 ]. Lectins from Rhodophyta and Chlorophyta have been shown to have anti-inflammatory results in studies, as well as acting as an antibacterial and antiviral and having pro-healing qualities and other antimicrobial properties [ 87 ].

Beyond high-molecular-weight biomolecules, marine macroalgae produce a diverse repertoire of low-molecular-weight secondary metabolites (typically <1500 Da) that play critical ecological roles in defence and signalling and increasingly represent promising leads for biomedical applications [ 9 , 22 ]. These include terpenoids, halogenated compounds, phenolic derivatives, and small bioactive lipophilic molecules [ 22 ].

Among these, terpenoids are one of the most structurally diverse and biologically active classes identified in macroalgae, particularly within Phaeophyceae [ 22 ]. Brown algae such as Bifurcaria bifurcata are well recognised for their production of linear and cyclic diterpenes, including compounds such as eleganolone, bifurcadiol, and related meroditerpenoids, which have demonstrated cytotoxic, antioxidant, and anti-proliferative activities across cancer cell models [ 35 ].

These compounds are biosynthetically derived from isoprenoid pathways and exhibit activity that is often linked to membrane interaction, redox modulation, and induction of apoptosis. Importantly, variability in their abundance is strongly influenced by environmental conditions, reinforcing the link between ecological stress and metabolite diversity [ 26 ].

In addition to diterpenes, macroalgae—particularly red algae (Rhodophyta), produce a wide range of halogenated monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, especially within genera such as Laurencia and Plocamium [ 33 ]. These compounds frequently contain bromine or chlorine substituents and are associated with potent anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anti-proliferative activities [ 88 ]. Mechanistically, their bioactivity has been linked to the disruption of cellular membranes, modulation of intracellular signalling pathways, and interference with enzymatic processes [ 88 ]. The degree and position of halogenation are known to significantly influence biological activity, suggesting clear structure–activity relationships that may be exploited for drug development [ 34 ].

Other macroalgal secondary metabolites include small phenolic derivatives and lipid-associated compounds, which contribute to antioxidant defence and immunomodulation [ 8 ]. Although less extensively characterised than polysaccharides or pigments, these low-molecular-weight compounds provide an important complementary layer of bioactivity, often acting synergistically within crude extracts [ 9 , 41 ].

3.4.2. Peptides and Secondary Metabolites in Microalgae

Microalgae also produce bioactive peptides and secondary metabolites with antimicrobial, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory properties [ 89 ]. For example, peptides derived from Chlorella vulgaris protein hydrolysates have demonstrated antioxidant and antihypertensive activities [ 90 ]; while compounds isolated from dinoflagellates such as Amphidinium spp. include amphidinols, which exhibit potent antifungal and cytotoxic activities [ 91 ]. These molecules often arise from stress-induced metabolic pathways and may function as defence compounds or signalling molecules within marine ecosystems. Increasing interest in metabolomics and bioprospecting of marine microalgae continues to reveal new classes of secondary metabolites with high potential in medical applications.

Microalgae and associated microorganisms further expand the chemical diversity of low-molecular-weight metabolites, particularly through the production of polyketides, alkaloids, and toxin-derived bioactives [ 7 , 92 ]. These compounds are typically synthesised via polyketide synthase (PKS) or non-ribosomal peptide pathways and frequently exhibit high potency, albeit sometimes with associated toxicity that limits direct therapeutic use [ 93 ].

A key class within this category is microalgal polyketides, exemplified by compounds such as okadaic acid and amphidinolides, produced by dinoflagellates [ 50 ]. Okadaic acid is a well characterised inhibitor of serine/threonine protein phosphatases (PP1 and PP2A), leading to dysregulation of phosphorylation-dependent signalling pathways, induction of oxidative stress, and apoptosis [ 94 ]. While its toxicity precludes direct clinical application, it remains an important molecular tool in cancer and cell-signalling research. Amphidinolides, in contrast, represent a structurally diverse group of macrolide polyketides with potent cytotoxic activity, often acting through disruption of cytoskeletal organisation and actin dynamics [ 50 , 91 ].

Microalgae also produce bioactive alkaloids and neurotoxins, including domoic acid and saxitoxin-like compounds, which interact with ion channels or neurotransmitter receptors [ 92 ]. Domoic acid, for example, acts as a glutamate receptor agonist, inducing excitotoxicity through overstimulation of neuronal signalling pathways. Although primarily studied in the context of harmful algal blooms, these compounds provide valuable insight into receptor-targeted pharmacology and highlight the potential of marine metabolites as highly specific bioactive scaffolds [ 93 ].

Importantly, despite their toxicity, these microalgal metabolites demonstrate clear mechanistic precision, targeting defined molecular pathways such as phosphatase inhibition, ion channel modulation, or cytoskeletal disruption [ 92 , 94 ]. This specificity underpins their potential utility as lead structures for drug development, provided that issues related to toxicity, selectivity, and delivery can be addressed [ 93 ].

3.5. Common Biological Activities Across Classes

3.5.1. Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects

Marine macroalgae and microalgae represent a well-established source of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agents spanning diverse functional classes, including carotenoids, phenolics (e.g., phlorotannins), sulphated polysaccharides, glycolipids, and sterols. Across in vitro and in vivo systems, these metabolites consistently converge on the suppression of key pro-inflammatory mediators, such as nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ), TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, and the downregulation of inducible enzymes including iNOS and COX-2. These effects are typically accompanied by restoration of redox homeostasis through coordinated inhibition of NF-κB and MAPK signalling pathways and activation of Nrf2-dependent antioxidant responses [ 95 ] ( Table 1 ). Importantly, while this mechanistic convergence is consistent, biological activity is strongly influenced by physicochemical properties, including molecular weight, degree of sulphation or polymerisation, lipid unsaturation, and compound stability. These parameters govern cellular uptake, receptor interaction, and metabolic fate, thereby shaping overall bioactivity and translational potential.

Within this shared framework, carotenoid pigments are among the most extensively characterised contributors. Fucoxanthin (macroalgae) and astaxanthin (microalgae) demonstrate robust anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity through inhibition of NF-κB signalling and enhancement of Nrf2-mediated cytoprotective pathways [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. However, their translational potential is conditioned by metabolic transformation and physicochemical stability; for example, fucoxanthin is converted to fucoxanthinol during absorption [ 99 ], while its stability is influenced by environmental factors such as pH, temperature, and light [ 100 ]. In contrast, for astaxanthin, stereochemistry and esterification play a key role in determining stability and bioavailability, with esterified forms often showing improved stability under digestion-relevant conditions [ 101 ]. These considerations highlight the need to evaluate metabolite profiles and formulation strategies alongside intrinsic bioactivity ( Table 1 ).

Phenolic compounds, particularly phlorotannins from brown macroalgae, further reinforce this paradigm by combining direct radical scavenging with pathway-level immunomodulation [ 102 ]. Their activity is influenced by the degree of polymerisation and extract composition, with lower-molecular-weight subfractions often exhibiting enhanced cellular activity. Across various studies the inhibition of NF-κB and MAPK signalling is consistently observed, resulting in reduced expression of iNOS, COX-2, and pro-inflammatory cytokines ( Table 1 ) [ 103 , 104 ].

Sulphated polysaccharides, including fucoidan, laminarin, and ulvan, represent a structurally complex class in which bioactivity is highly dependent on molecular architecture. Variations in sulphation pattern and molecular weight distribution influence receptor interactions, biodistribution, and overall biological effect [ 105 ]. Fucoidan, for example, comprises heterogeneous sulphated polysaccharide populations whose anti-inflammatory efficacy, demonstrated across cell-based and in vivo models, is closely linked to these structural features [ 106 , 107 ], while low-molecular-weight ulvan fractions show improved efficacy and tolerability in vivo [ 104 ]. Laminarin further illustrates the role of biological context, acting as both an antioxidant and an immunomodulator depending on molecular characteristics and receptor engagement [ 108 , 109 ] ( Table 1 ).

Lipid-derived compounds, including sterols, glycolipids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, also contribute to anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects through the modulation of NF-κB, MAPK, and Nrf2 pathways. Here, activity is frequently associated with the degree and positioning of unsaturation, which influences membrane interactions and downstream signalling [ 110 ]. Compounds such as fucosterol, glycolipid fractions (e.g., MGDGs), and microalgae-derived fatty acids (e.g., DGLA) demonstrate suppression of inflammatory mediators alongside modulation of lipid signalling pathways, reinforcing the link between lipid structure and bioactivity ( Table 1 ) [ 111 , 112 , 113 ].

Across these classes, several studies report favourable selectivity and tolerability within active concentration ranges, particularly for polysaccharides and lipid-derived compounds. In vivo evidence further supports translational relevance, with fucoidan demonstrating efficacy in acute and systemic inflammation models [ 106 , 107 ], ulvan improving outcomes in colitis [ 114 ], and laminarin providing protection in UV-induced skin injury [ 109 ]. However, context-dependent effects, particularly for immunomodulatory polysaccharides such as laminarin, highlight the importance of defining the molecular characteristics and biological setting when interpreting outcomes [ 108 ].

Collectively, algal-derived bioactive compounds converge on the suppression of inflammatory signalling and restoration of redox balance, with their activity strongly influenced by structure–activity relationships and physicochemical properties [ 115 , 116 ]. Key translational challenges include standardisation, molecular characterisation, and bioavailability, particularly for carotenoids, as well as limited cross-study comparability, underscoring the need for harmonised reporting to support clinical and biotechnological translation [ 117 , 118 , 119 ].

Table 1
Representative anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of marine algae. The down arrow (↓) indicates a decreasing change, while the up arrow (↑) indicates an increasing change.

Functional ClassCompound/ExtractRepresentative ChemicalSource SpeciesExperimental ModelAssay/Effect Size or IC 50 (Units)Mechanism(s)Key Ref(s)
Carotenoids (Pigments)FucoxanthinIshige okamuraeLPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages↓ NO and PGE 2 ; ↓ iNOS/COX-2 proteins; ↓ IL-1β/TNF-α/IL-6 (dose-dependent)↓ NF-κB activation (inhibition of IκBα degradation and p50/p65 translocation); ↓ MAPK phosphorylation (ERK/JNK/p38)[ 96 ]
FucoxanthinBrown algae fractionation ( Myagropsis myagroides identified as source for active fraction)LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophagesNO inhibition correlated with fucoxanthin abundance (r 2 = 0.9511); ↓ iNOS/COX-2 proteins and gene expression. ↓ IL-1β/TNF-α/IL-6 (dose-dependent)Anti-inflammatory profile dominated by iNOS downregulation[ 97 ]
AstaxanthinHaematococcus pluvialisRAW 264.7 macrophages; WT vs. Nrf2-deficient BMDMs↓ Il-6 and Il-1β mRNA; ↓ ROS; ↓ NF-κB p65 nuclear translocationNF-κB inhibition; NRF2 nuclear translocation; NOX2 downregulation; altered macrophage polarisation. Nrf2-dependent and Nrf2-independent pathways[ 98 ]
GlycolipidsMGDGs (1:1 mixture) and monoacylglycerolFucus spiralisLPS-stimulated RAW 264.7NO inhibition IC 50 : 60.06 µg/mL (MGDG mixture) vs. 65.70 µg/mL (monoacylglycerol); unsaturation linked to potencyiNOS-linked NO suppression; SAR suggests higher unsaturation improves activity[ 112 ]
Lipids (fatty acids)DGLA (free acid/ethyl ester; microalga-derived preparation)Lobosphaera incisa P127LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7100 µM: ↓ NO and IL-6; ↓ iNOS/IL6 transcription; non-toxic up to 250 µMProstanoid shift towards PGE1; ↓ NO/iNOS; ↓ ROS in LPS context[ 113 ]
Phlorotannins/phenolicsPhlorotannin-rich extract and fractionse.g., Fucophlorethol AFucus vesiculosusChemical antioxidant assays; LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7NO• scavenging IC 50 75.2 ± 5.1 µg/mL (crude); O 2 • − IC 50 98.7 ± 11.1 µg/mL; XO IC 50 2.8 ± 0.4 µg/mL; at 100 µg/mL, NO• reduced to ~14–17% vs. LPSLower-MW fractions more active; NF-κB blockade via inhibition of IκBα phosphorylation/degradation[ 102 ]
Phlorofucofuroeckol AEcklonia stoloniferaLPS-treated RAW 264.720 µM: ↓ iNOS/COX-2 mRNA; ↓ IL-1β/IL-6/TNF-α↓ NF-κB and AP-1 promoter activity; ↓ Akt and p38 MAPK activation[ 103 ]
PolysaccharidesFucoidan fraction “SF6”α-L-fucose-4-sulphate (fucoidan repeat)Saccharina japonicaLPS-stimulated RAW 264.7Viability >90% at 50–200 µg/mL; 200 µg/mL: NO inhibition ~dexamethasone comparator; ↓ iNOS/COX-2; ↓ TNF-α/IL-6/IL-1β↓ NF-κB activation (IKK/IκB; p50/p65 nuclear translocation); ↓ MAPKs; ↓ JAK2–STAT1/3[ 106 ]
Fucoidan (structurally characterised; multi-MW fractions)α-L-fucose-4-sulphate (fucoidan repeat)Cystoseira/Ericaria crinitaHistamine paw oedema rat; LPS systemic inflammation ratPaw oedema markedly reduced at 25–50 mg/kg; serum IL-1β and TNF-α reducedIn vivo anti-inflammatory effect with cytokine downregulation[ 120 ]
Low-molecular-weight (2.6 kDa) sulphated ulvanUlvanobiouronic acid (ulvan repeat)Ulva sp.DSS-induced colitis mouse model50 and 100 mg/kg: ↓ DAI; ↓ colon shortening; ↓ MDA; ↑ GPx and CAT; acute toxicity absent <1200 mg/kgAntioxidant defence restoration; inflammation reduction; barrier/tight-junction support[ 114 , 121 ]
LaminarinLaminaribiose (laminarin repeat)Laminaria digitataUVB-induced dorsal-skin damage in mice3% Topical administration: ↓ superoxide-associated oxidative stress; ↑ SOD1/SOD2, GPx, catalase; improved histologyAntioxidant enzyme restoration linked to reduced oxidative injury and skin inflammation features[ 109 ]
SterolsFucosterolUndaria pinnatifidaLPS-induced RAW 264.7↓ NO, TNF-α, IL-6 via transcriptional downregulation (concentrations not stated in abstract)↓ NF-κB DNA binding/transcriptional activity; ↓ NF-κB phosphorylation/nuclear translocation; ↓ p38 pathway signalling (MKK3/6, MK2)[ 122 ]
FucosterolSargassum horneriTNF-α/IFN-γ-stimulated human dermal fibroblastsNon-toxic up to 120 µM; 30/60/120 µM: ↓ ROS; ↑ viability vs. cytokine-stressed cells↑ Nrf2 nuclear translocation; ↑ HO-1/NQO1; ↓ NF-κB/MAPK phosphorylation and p65 nuclear translocation[ 123 ]

3.5.2. Cytotoxic and Anti-Proliferative Activity

Marine macroalgae and microalgae also exhibit cytotoxic and anti-proliferative activity across multiple functional classes, including carotenoids, phenolics, sulphated polysaccharides, terpenes, and polyketides [ 124 ]. Despite chemical diversity, these effects consistently converge on apoptosis induction and cell-cycle disruption, often involving mitochondrial pathways, caspase activation, and modulation of MAPK and PI3K/AKT signalling [ 124 , 125 ]. As for anti-inflammatory activity, cytotoxic effects are strongly influenced by physicochemical properties, including molecular weight, sulphation pattern, lipophilicity, and compound composition, which determine potency, selectivity, and cellular uptake [ 93 ].

Within this framework, carotenoids are among the best characterised algal cytotoxic agents, demonstrating reproducible anti-proliferative effects across multiple cancer cell models both in vitro and in vivo [ 122 , 123 , 124 ]. These effects are typically associated with ROS generation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins, highlighting a central role for intrinsic apoptotic pathways. Importantly, activity is influenced by the isomeric composition, co-extracted metabolites, and bioavailability constraints, meaning that purified compounds and complex extracts may not be biologically equivalent [ 126 , 127 , 128 ].

Phenolic compounds, particularly phlorotannins, reinforce this mechanistic pattern through combined redox modulation and signalling disruption. Evidence from in vitro and in vivo systems supports their ability to induce apoptosis via mitochondrial pathways and caspase activation [ 125 ], with activity influenced by structural features such as degree of polymerisation.

Beyond these classes, secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, terpenes, and polyketides expand the anti-proliferative landscape while maintaining mechanistic convergence. These compounds frequently act through apoptosis-associated pathways, including caspase activation, ROS generation, and cytoskeletal disruption [ 126 , 127 ]. In particular, polyketide metabolites exhibit high potency but remain translationally constrained due to toxicity [ 129 , 130 ].

Polysaccharides, including fucoidan, laminarin, and ulvan, generally act at higher concentrations but retain consistent anti-proliferative effects, often associated with apoptosis and cytostatic regulation [ 128 , 131 ]. Their activity is strongly dependent on structural features such as molecular weight and sulphation pattern, with emerging roles in combination therapies through modulation of ROS- and AKT-related signalling.

Extract-based studies further highlight the importance of experimental context. Differences between 2D and 3D models, alongside variability in cultivation conditions, significantly influence observed bioactivity [ 41 , 132 , 133 ]. These findings reinforce the need for physiologically relevant systems when assessing translational potential.

Overall, apoptosis remains the dominant anti-proliferative endpoint across algal classes, typically coupled with redox modulation and cell-cycle disruption. However, translational potential is shaped by variability in potency, selectivity, and physicochemical properties, alongside limitations related to the extract heterogeneity, bioavailability, and toxicity of highly potent metabolites ( Table 2 ) [ 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 ]. Greater standardisation of compound characterisation and model systems will be critical for advancing these compounds towards clinical application [ 125 ].

3.5.3. Pro-Regenerative and Protective Effects

Marine macroalgae and microalgae also exhibit consistent pro-regenerative and tissue-protective activity across key functional classes, particularly sulphated polysaccharides, carotenoids, and sterols [ 135 , 136 ]. These activities are mediated through integrated modulation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and regenerative signalling pathways. Key functional outcomes include enhanced wound healing, promotion of angiogenesis (VEGF/eNOS), and regulation of extracellular matrix remodelling, alongside reductions in oxidative stress and inflammatory mediators [ 137 , 138 , 139 ]. These effects extend across ischaemic and inflammatory models, where improvements in perfusion, endothelial function, and barrier integrity are consistently observed.

Carotenoids and related compounds further reinforce this paradigm through combined antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms, particularly in photodamage models, where they preserve collagen structure and restore endogenous antioxidant defences [ 140 , 141 , 142 ]. At a systemic level, compounds such as fucoidan mitigate organ injury by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines and apoptosis while activating Nrf2-dependent antioxidant pathways [ 143 , 144 ]. Sterols such as fucosterol similarly contribute to maintaining fibroblast function under inflammatory stress through coordinated modulation of redox and signalling pathways [ 119 ].

Collectively, these findings position algal bioactives as multifunctional modulators of tissue repair, acting at the interface of oxidative stress, inflammation, and regenerative signalling [ 136 , 137 ]. However, as with other activity domains, translational potential remains dependent on physicochemical properties, bioavailability, and standardisation, underscoring the need for well characterised compounds and clinically relevant models.

4. Translational Applications of Algae-Derived Bioactives

Section four explores the translational applications of algae-derived bioactives across nutrition, skincare, regenerative medicine and oncology. Examples of relevant clinical trials and their status are available in Appendix A , Table A1 .

4.1. Nutraceuticals and Food Security

Beyond their role as sources of diverse bioactive metabolites, macroalgae and microalgae are increasingly recognised as valuable nutraceutical ingredients and functional food resources with relevance to chronic disease prevention, dietary quality, and food security [ 9 , 16 ]. Their potential is underpinned by a rich composition that includes long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, carotenoids, sulphated polysaccharides, phenolics, peptides, vitamins, minerals, fibre-like carbohydrates, and high-quality protein [ 145 ]. Accordingly, recent reviews position marine algae as multifunctional nutritional assets with clear translational relevance to preventive health [ 16 , 145 ].

From a nutraceutical perspective, the strongest evidence relates to cardiometabolic health. Meta-analyses show that edible algae, particularly Spirulina , can reduce blood pressure, while supplements from macroalgae improve body mass index, fat mass, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, although glycaemic effects remain less consistent [ 140 , 141 ]. These findings support the use of marine algae as a preventive nutritional intervention rather than a therapeutic substitute, particularly in relation to hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and obesity-associated metabolic dysfunction [ 140 , 141 ].

The preventive effects of marine algae likely arise from the chemical complexity of their biomass. Macroalgae provide diverse polysaccharides, pigments, polyphenols, minerals, and lipids, while microalgae are important sources of EPA- and DHA-rich oils, protein concentrates, and carotenoid-rich ingredients [ 142 ]. This translational potential is already reflected in commercially relevant products, including omega-3-rich oils, whole-biomass powders, phycocyanin extracts, and functional food or feed ingredients from genera such as Chlorella , Nannochloropsis , Schizochytrium , and Arthrospira ( Spirulina ) [ 16 , 142 , 143 , 145 ]. Accordingly, marine algae now occupy an active innovation space spanning nutraceuticals, fortified foods, aquafeed, and dietary supplements [ 9 , 16 , 142 , 143 , 145 ].

A further preventive mechanism involves the gut microbiome. Many macroalgal polysaccharides are resistant to digestion by host enzymes yet remain accessible to microbial fermentation, thereby influencing the generation of metabolites relevant to inflammation, oxidative balance, satiety, and lipid and glucose homeostasis [ 144 ]. On this basis, macroalgal-derived polysaccharides are increasingly regarded as promising prebiotic substrates, particularly in the context of metabolic syndrome and associated chronic disorders [ 144 ].

Microalgae are also highly relevant to food security, particularly at the systems level. Unlike many conventional food and feed resources, microalgae can be cultivated on non-arable land, may use saline or non-potable water, and can be integrated into circular bio-economy models involving carbon capture, wastewater valorisation, and nutrient recovery [ 146 ]. They are therefore attracting increasing interest as alternative protein sources and as sustainable ingredients for animal feed and aquaculture [ 147 ]. This trajectory is also reflected in the development of the European algae sector, where 447 algae and Spirulina production units across 23 countries have been identified, with biomass directed primarily towards food, food-related applications, supplements, and nutraceuticals [ 147 ].

However, this potential must be considered alongside important translational constraints, including compositional variability, production costs, scalability, consumer acceptance, and safety assurance [ 9 , 16 , 145 ]. Macroalgae may accumulate heavy metals, iodine, and other contaminants, while microalgae-based products still face challenges in cultivation, downstream processing, and market uptake [ 9 , 16 ]. Progress will therefore require standardised cultivation and processing, species-specific compositional profiling, contaminant monitoring, and stronger human evidence based on well-defined preparations and doses [ 148 ]. The commercial implications of this are discussed further in Section 5.1.2 .

Overall, marine algae represent a versatile platform for preventive nutrition and more resilient food systems. Their value lies not only in their bioactive richness, but also in their capacity to support more sustainable and health-oriented models of production and consumption [ 16 , 145 ]. With robust evidence, safety assurance, and technological standardisation, they could make a meaningful contribution to chronic disease prevention, dietary diversification, and food security.

4.2. Translational Potential of Marine-Derived Bioactives in Cosmetics

4.2.1. Molecular Drivers of Skin Ageing and Cosmetic Intervention Points

Human skin, being in contact with the external environment, is continuously exposed to numerous harmful agents, driving its ageing and deteriorating its appearance. Among these agents, solar UV exposure is the major generator of reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediating oxidative stress within the skin [ 149 , 150 ]. Consequently, solar exposure triggers hyperpigmentation (excessive production of melanin), dryness, and the degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, forming wrinkles [ 149 , 151 ].

The cosmetics industry has an established demand for developing innovative anti-ageing products, most recently focused on achieving the following outcomes: (i) photoprotection against solar exposure through antioxidant activity; (ii) skin whitening by targeting tyrosinase (TYR), a rate-limiting enzyme in melanogenesis; and (iii) skin firmness by targeting matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and UV-inducible enzymes degrading ECM proteins [ 149 , 150 ].

Marine ecosystems are a particularly attractive resource for cosmetics as they contain a vast, underexploited library of structurally diverse molecules produced by marine organisms to adapt to prominent environmental stressors, namely UV exposure [ 149 , 150 ]. As discussed throughout Section 3 , marine-sourced actives are commonly organised into several functional classes. In cosmetics MAAs, polysaccharides, carotenoids, polyphenols, fatty acids, peptides/proteins, alkaloids, and terpenoids, each map onto specific, translationally relevant skin endpoints [ 149 ].

4.2.2. Photoprotection: UV Absorption and ROS Control

As photoaging is strongly tied to UV-induced ROS and subsequent tissue damage, one translational opportunity is to deploy marine compounds either as UV filters or as bioactives that attenuate UV-induced cellular damage through a combination of UV-absorbing capacity and radical scavenging properties [ 151 ]. Anti-photoaging activity is tightly linked to a combination of UV-absorbing capacity and radical scavenging properties. Macroalgae, found from intertidal shores down to ~150 m depth, experience substantial UV exposure and therefore synthesise photoprotective molecules [ 150 ]. MAAs are photostable molecules with additional antioxidant roles that absorb UVA/UVB and dissipate energy as harmless heat without photochemical reactions [ 150 , 152 , 153 ]. In vivo, MAA-containing emulsions (mycosporin-2-glycin, shinorine, porphyra-334) applied to mouse ears upregulated antioxidant enzyme activity and showed anti-photooxidative abilities upon irradiation [ 154 ]. In vitro, palythine, an MAA extracted from the red algae Chondrus yendoi , is reported to afford broad protection in keratinocytes exposed to solar-simulating and UVA radiation, including protection against DNA photolesions (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine) [ 152 ]. Collectively, these findings support the framing of MAAs as potential natural, biocompatible alternatives to approved UV filters, and as an eco-friendly route to photoprotection.

Macroalgal polysaccharides (fucoidan, laminarin, carrageenan) are similarly positioned as anti-photoaging ingredients, with effects that are mediated by intracellular ROS scavenging in UV-irradiated cells and in vivo models, alongside moisturising benefits that help boost skin appearance [ 150 ]. For example, fucoidan photoprotection has been studied in UVB-irradiated HaCaT keratinocytes, human foreskin fibroblasts (HS 68), zebrafish, and in other in vivo models, supporting its potential relevance to the skincare and cosmetic industries [ 151 ]. Carrageenans tested in UVB-irradiated HaCaT cells provided significant protection against UVB-induced apoptosis and scavenged free radicals [ 155 ]. Laminarin treatment in mice models increased dermal thickness, decreased MMP-1 expression, protected dorsal skin from UVB-induced photodamage, and increased collagen fibres in UVB-treated skin [ 156 ]. Laminarin also attenuated IL-6 and ROS levels in UVA-irradiated dermal fibroblasts and keratinocyte models [ 150 ]. Such polysaccharide examples map onto a coherent translational axis: controlling ROS reduces inflammation and MMPs activity, which in turn preserves ECM structure, all aligning with anti-photoaging claims.

Additional photoprotective opportunities arise from polyphenols, particularly phlorotannins and carotenoids which show photoprotective properties, especially against UVB. Phlorotannins are potent radical scavengers, where hydroxyl groups donate electrons to reactive species, limiting ROS-mediated macromolecule damage and inhibiting signalling pathways such as NF-κB and MAPK [ 150 , 157 ]. In fact, phenolic compounds from Turbinaria ornata showed antioxidant activity and very high tyrosinase-inhibiting activity, while an ethyl acetate fraction from Padina boergesenii demonstrated antioxidant and UV-shielding effects in keratinocytes upon UV-induced damage [ 149 , 158 ]. Carotenoid-rich extracts (e.g., from Padina australis ) showed antioxidant activity and protected human keratinocytes from UV-induced damage [ 149 ]. However, a notable key limitation is that cutaneous absorption of marine carotenoids remains to be determined, a crucial step before their implementation in sunscreen formulations.

4.2.3. Pigmentation Control: TYR Inhibition as a Dominant Cellular Target

Within a cosmetics context, equalising pigmentation is linked to the targeting of tyrosinase, described as the dominant enzyme in melanogenesis. Several marine-derived compounds support this aim [ 149 , 150 ]. Red-algae polysaccharides (including 3,6-anhydrogalactose-containing fractions) from Porphyra haitanensis , Gracilaria chouae , and Gracilaria blodgettii are noted to have skin-whitening and tyrosinase-inhibiting activities [ 149 ]. Studies have found that phenolics from the Phaeophyceae species Turbinaria ornata were associated with very high tyrosinase inhibition, supporting dual anti-ageing/whitening properties [ 158 ]. Concerning marine by-products, astaxanthin derived from shrimp shells ( Litopenaeus vannamei ) inhibited TYR in a dose-dependent manner (3–50 g/mL), and a polypeptide hydrolysate from tilapia by-products suppressed TYR activity (5 g/mL) and reduced melanin production in mouse melanoma cells (B16-F10) [ 159 , 160 ]. A further example within phlorotannins includes the in vitro and in vivo whitening effects of 4-hydroxyphenethyl alcohol (4-HPEA) isolated from Hizikia fusiformis , where topical application promoted depigmentation of UVB-induced hyperpigmented spots in brown guinea pig skin [ 157 ].

Together, these studies support a translational narrative in which marine-derived compounds serve as anti-pigmentary candidates that converge on a well-defined molecular target (TYR) while remaining compatible with broader anti-photoaging strategies.

4.2.4. Repair and Regeneration: Wound Healing and ECM-Centric Approaches

Beyond photoprotection, there exist marine-derived opportunities for skin repair through wound healing and ECM restoration. Wound healing is described as a physiological process occurring in three overlapping phases: inflammation, proliferation (encompassing angiogenesis, collagen deposition, formation of granulation tissue, and epithelialization), and tissue remodelling. Prolonged inflammatory cytokine secretion (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1) can extend the inflammatory phase and promote chronic wounds or hypertrophic scarring, while inflammatory mediators and free radicals increase tissue damage [ 161 ].

A key example is the sulphated polysaccharide low-molecular-weight fucoidan (LMF), which has been validated in a full-thickness dermal excision rat model. LMF showed beneficial effects comparable to or better than a commercial reference product and was linked to reduced neutrophil adhesion/leukocyte recruitment and inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine release. LMF treatment increased immunoreactive cells expressing TGF-β and VEGFR2 (associated with VEGF responses), inhibited TNF-α/IL-6/IL-1β expression, reduced iNOS and COX-2 expression, and decreased oxidative stress [ 161 ]. Altogether, LMF has potential as a topical agent to promote wound healing in humans. Complementing this, polysaccharides from Gracilaria lemaneiformis (GLP-2) enhanced keratinocyte proliferation and migration, consistent with a wound-healing product rationale [ 149 ]. Additionally, laminarin-based creams are linked to accelerated collagen deposition and re-epithelialization in rats and protected skin cells from oxidative stress [ 162 ].

4.2.5. Translational Considerations: Delivery Routes, Advanced Testing Models, and Sustainable Sourcing

With the growing demand to incorporate natural compounds, the translational success of marine-derived compounds depends not only on their bioactivity but also on their formulation, delivery, and safety. For example, despite high antioxidant activity, oral fucoxanthin did not result in efficient cutaneous concentrations in mice, motivating topical delivery. In a reconstructed human skin (RHS) model, built from a fibroblast-containing a type I collagen dermal compartment topped with keratinocytes and raised to an air–liquid interface, topical fucoxanthin at 0.5% (within the 0.01–1% range used for antioxidants in cosmetic formulations) was delivered in alkyl benzoate [ 163 ]. In this model, fucoxanthin ameliorated the detrimental effects of ethanol on tissue viability and inflammatory response, illustrating how advanced skin equivalents can support more physiological assessments aligned with cosmetic safety and efficacy evaluation [ 163 ].

4.3. Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Repair

Regenerative medicine encompasses a broad spectrum of strategies aimed at restoring tissue structure and function through the integration of biomaterials, bioactive compounds, and cell-based therapies. This therapeutic approach to treat degenerative diseases aims to repair damaged tissues by acting on progenitor or stem cells to restore physiological functions. Research in this field typically investigates the mechanisms underlying the differentiation of progenitor cells into mature entities. While applications span multiple organ systems, the musculoskeletal system represents a particularly relevant and challenging target due to the limited intrinsic regenerative capacity of cartilage, bone, and connective tissues, as well as the high prevalence of degenerative conditions such as osteoarthritis. In this context, the development of functional biomaterial platforms that can support cell localisation, modulate the microenvironment, and deliver bioactive cues is critical for therapeutic success. Marine algae-derived polysaccharides and bioactive metabolites are increasingly recognised as promising candidates within this landscape, with physicochemical properties and immunomodulatory and pro-regenerative activities that are directly relevant to musculoskeletal repair.

4.3.1. Regenerative Medicine for Musculoskeletal Diseases

Disorders of the musculoskeletal system are leading contributors to disability worldwide, commonly affecting between one in three and one in five people from adolescence to old age. According to the World Health Organization, the most common musculoskeletal conditions are osteoarthritis, back and neck pain, fractures associated with osteoporosis and injuries, and autoimmune inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis. These conditions are typically associated with persistent pain, limited mobility and dexterity, and a reduction in people’s ability to work and participate in social roles, with a direct negative effect on mental wellbeing and communities’ health status [ 164 ].

Experiments investigating progenitor cells have addressed their use to repair bone, cartilage and other tissues compromised by chronic degeneration. The production of new tissue in vitro and in vivo is influenced by several factors such as the cell type involved, microenvironment and local stimulation by growth factors or other molecules. Gold-standard progenitor cells that can generate bone and cartilage are Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs), undifferentiated cells with a fibroblastic shape that can differentiate to osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipose lineages [ 165 ]. The microenvironment stimulating their differentiation is extensively studied by tissue engineers, experimenting with various biomaterials such as collagen or marine-derived calcium phosphate matrices as scaffold structures to home cells that can facilitate their differentiation. Local stimulation to drive cell fate is also extensively studied, mostly using peptide growth factors such as Transforming Growth Factors (TGFβs) and Bone Morphogenic Proteins (BMPs) or compounds widely implemented for in vitro studies such as dexamethasone. Additional effort investigates the potential of new bioactive compounds to improve the stimulatory effect.

Since the early demonstration that MSCs were able to form multiple skeletal tissues in vivo [ 166 ], these cells gained interest for therapeutic use in regenerative medicine to repair damaged articular cartilage [ 167 ]. The initial concept was a “tissue-specific cell replacement therapy” [ 168 ], wherein MSCs delivered to damaged cartilage would differentiate into chondrocytes, while MSCs delivered to damaged bone would differentiate into osteogenic progenitors to specifically regenerate the required tissue under local stimulating factors. This strategy was approached in different ways: using autologous or allogeneic MSCs, in vitro expanded or stimulated cells for differentiation, and often implementing biomaterials or scaffolds such as collagen to improve cell retention in vivo after implantation. The initial idea of cell replacement therapy was demonstrated to be too simplistic over time and reliable tissue regeneration after cell injection was hindered by the lack of a clear understanding of the mechanisms influencing regeneration in situ. A significant step forward towards understanding the mechanism underlying in vivo tissue regeneration after MSC injection was made by studying an osteoarthritic joint model.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common chronic condition of the joint affecting millions of people around the world and characterised by deterioration of cartilage and the development of undesired calcified structures causing severe pain. In osteoarthritis, the differentiation of endogenous stem cells to generate cartilage is too poor to maintain articular homeostasis, while other synovial stem cells differentiate along the osteogenic fate to generate abnormal bone formations and worsen the disease. A local inflammation state is also involved in the activation of pathways to influence osteogenic progenitors, generating a hostile environment for the correct physiological functioning of the joint. Pioneering work from Murphy et al. [ 169 ] showed amelioration of the osteoarthritic joint environment after intra-articular injection of autologous MSCs: typical signs of OA progression such as cartilage erosion, osteophyte formation, and subchondral sclerosis were significantly less evident in the cell-treated knees, but the effect was not obtained by differentiation of the injected MSCs.

4.3.2. Regenerative Approaches to Other Degenerative Diseases

Studies in regenerative medicine are not only beneficial for articular cartilage regeneration or bone repair. The knowledge acquired on progenitor cell behaviour and their effect on the surrounding environment highlighted their role in several other degenerative pathologies. For example, development of the most common vascular disease, atherosclerosis, is strongly influenced by undesired behaviour of circulating progenitor/stem cells. Initially considered a passive degenerative process, vascular calcification developing in atherosclerosis is now considered an active and highly regulated disease involving progenitor cells. The aetiology of this condition is thought to begin with lipid accumulation or damage of the blood vessel which triggers the creation of the plaque. At this site circulating progenitor cells or pericytes in blood vessel walls proliferate, while local macrophages and monocytes secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines. The inflamed microenvironment with proliferating stem cells stimulates their abnormal differentiation and the production of extracellular matrix components such as collagen which contributes to plaque growth.

4.3.3. Marine-Derived Compounds in Regenerative Medicine

Preclinical studies across skin, cartilage, and bone models consistently demonstrate multifunctional benefits, including enhanced wound closure, angiogenesis, and controlled delivery of bioactive factors, although these effects are often observed in composite systems and small-scale studies. Fucoidan-based materials, for example, have been shown to accelerate wound healing through angiogenic signalling pathways [ 170 ], while ulvan and carrageenan systems demonstrate improved repair when combined with antimicrobial or drug-delivery components [ 171 , 172 ]. Agarose-based composites similarly support bio-integration and vascularisation in vivo [ 173 , 174 , 175 ], underscoring the importance of hybrid material design in achieving functional regenerative outcomes. Importantly, within the musculoskeletal context, these biomaterial-driven strategies align with established regenerative medicine frameworks in which MSCs act as multipotent cells capable of differentiating into cartilage, bone, and other connective tissues central to skeletal repair and joint homeostasis [ 176 , 177 ]. In this setting, marine algae-derived biomaterials offer a strategic advantage by enabling both structural support and biochemical modulation of the MSC niche, including enhanced cell retention within cartilage defects, spatial organisation within bone matrices, and localised presentation of growth factors relevant to osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation.

Emerging evidence suggests that sulphated polysaccharides such as fucoidan can influence key musculoskeletal regenerative pathways, including angiogenesis and osteogenesis, through interactions with VEGF and related signalling cascades [ 176 , 178 , 179 ], while their immunomodulatory properties may help mitigate the chronic inflammatory microenvironments characteristic of conditions such as osteoarthritis, which limit MSCs’ therapeutic efficacy [ 178 , 180 ]. This dual functionality, combining scaffold engineering with bioactive modulation, positions marine algae as a valuable component of next-generation musculoskeletal regenerative systems integrating biomaterials and cell-based therapies. Nevertheless, clinical translation remains uneven.

While alginate dressings are widely adopted, strong evidence of superiority over alternative treatments is limited in some indications [ 181 , 182 ], and more advanced applications such as injectable hydrogels highlight the need for long-term safety and efficacy data [ 183 , 184 ]. Across musculoskeletal applications, translational success is closely linked to purity, processing, and manufacturing considerations, including endotoxin control and sterilisation compatibility, which can significantly influence both material properties and biological responses [ 170 , 173 , 182 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 ].

Looking forward, the integration of well characterised marine algae-derived biomaterials with MSC-based and bioengineered musculoskeletal repair strategies is likely to be central to overcoming current translational bottlenecks, particularly through the development of standardised, scalable, and regulatory-compliant platforms capable of supporting clinically effective cartilage and bone regeneration.

4.4. Anticancer Therapeutics

Building on the conserved biological activities described in Section 3.3 , bioactive compounds derived specifically from marine microalgae and macroalgae are increasingly recognised as a promising and underexploited source of anticancer agents. Their structural motifs, rare in natural terrestrial products (e.g., extensive sulphation, halogenated phenolics, polyunsaturated side chains), underpin potent activities against multiple hallmarks of cancer, ranging from cell-cycle dysregulation to tumour immune evasion [ 2 , 3 , 92 ]. Importantly, these metabolites often act through multi-target mechanisms rather than single molecular pathways, positioning them as particularly attractive candidates for addressing tumour heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance in hard-to-treat malignancies [ 64 , 92 ].

4.4.1. Cell-Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis

Algal metabolites arrest the cancer cell cycle and initiate apoptosis through a spectrum of complementary mechanisms that map neatly onto their major chemical classes.

Carotenoids from brown algae are among the most potent agents in this context. Within cells, fucoxanthin is swiftly de-acetylated to fucoxanthinol, and together these two carotenoids downregulate cyclin D2/CDK4, inhibit PI3K/Akt and NF-κB, and activate caspases-9/3, culminating in G 1 arrest and apoptosis across leukaemia, breast and cervical models [ 189 , 190 , 191 ]. The green-algal carotenoid siphonaxanthin penetrates cells even more efficiently; its additional hydroxyl group accelerates ROS-mediated mitochondrial damage and synergises with TRAIL to amplify apoptotic signalling [ 192 ].

Among sulphated polysaccharides, fucoidan exemplifies multi-target potency. By suppressing HIF-1α/VEGF it blocks EMT-driven angiogenesis, while simultaneous inhibition of the CXCR4 axis and Bcl-2 family proteins promotes intrinsic apoptosis in hepatocellular and leukaemia cells [ 193 , 194 ]. Laminarin, a β-glucan from Laminaria digitata , shifts the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, releases cytochrome c, and attenuates ErbB2/3-PI3K signalling, leading to sub-G 1 accumulation in colon cancer cells [ 195 ]. Their biological activity is strongly influenced by structural features such as molecular weight and sulphation patterns, which govern receptor interactions and downstream signalling responses. Structurally distinct ulvan (green algae) and κ-carrageenan (red algae) likewise enforce caspase-dependent death and G 2 /M arrest [ 196 , 197 ].

Among phenolics, polymeric phlorotannins unique to brown algae, dieckol, phloroglucinol, and eckstolonol, act as CDK1/2 inhibitors. They impose either G 2 /M or G 0 /G 1 blockade and elicit ROS-driven apoptosis in breast, pancreatic and leukaemia models [ 102 , 198 ]. Their sizeable phenolic scaffolds also chelate transition metals, accentuating oxidative stress within tumour cells.

Phycobiliproteins and specialised pigments extend the arsenal of bioactive compounds isolated from marine algae with potential anticancer activity. R-phycoerythrin from red algae activates Fas and a cascade of caspases (-2, -3, -8, -9, -10), whereas C-phycocyanin from Spirulina platensis heightens Fas and ICAM expression on tumour membranes, fostering immune recognition while sparing normal cells [ 190 ]. The cyanobacterial pigment scytonemin inhibits polo-like kinase 1, locking multiple myeloma cells in G 2 /M [ 199 ].

Finally, cyclic and depsipeptidic peptides offer high-affinity microtubule or membrane targets. Kahalalide F disrupts membranes, arrests cells in G 0 /G 1 and induces caspase-independent death, effects magnified in HER2/3-overexpressing tumour cells due to downregulation of Akt signalling [ 200 ]. Cryptophycin analogues from cyanobacteria bind tubulin with picomolar affinity, producing catastrophic spindle failure and apoptotic collapse [ 201 ].

Taken together, these diverse compounds converge on a unified outcome: decisive interruption of cell-cycle progression followed by programmed cell death. Their multi-target profiles, structural novelty and selective cytotoxicity provide a robust foundation for overcoming chemoresistance in aggressive, heterogenous tumours.

4.4.2. DNA Damage and Repair Modulation

While most algal metabolites exert cytotoxicity through apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest, some can influence DNA integrity and repair processes, primarily through indirect mechanisms linked to oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. R-phycoerythrin causes DNA breakage alongside caspase activation, illustrating that algal phycobiliproteins can damage DNA [ 202 ]. Yessotoxins induce DNA fragmentation and perturb mitochondrial membrane potential [ 203 ]. This pro-oxidant shift, although context-dependent, can sensitise cancer cells to apoptosis and enhance susceptibility to conventional chemotherapeutic agents.

Polysaccharides such as fucoidan have also been implicated in modulating DNA repair pathways and chromatin organisation, although these effects remain less well characterised and appear to depend on structural heterogeneity and cellular context [ 204 ]. Rather than acting as direct genotoxic agents, algal-derived compounds are therefore better understood as modulators of cellular stress responses that indirectly compromise genomic stability in cancer cells. This capacity to enhance DNA damage or interfere with repair mechanisms supports their emerging role as potential chemosensitisers, particularly in combination with DNA-damaging agents, and highlights a key opportunity for integrating algal bioactives into combination therapy strategies [ 190 ].

4.4.3. Immune and Tumour Microenvironment Modulation

Beyond direct cytotoxic effects, a defining feature of algal-derived bioactives is their ability to modulate the tumour microenvironment and immune responses, an area of increasing importance in contemporary oncology. Sulphated polysaccharides such as fucoidan and laminarin are known to interact with pattern recognition receptors and influence immune cell activation, including that of macrophages, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells [ 205 , 206 ]. These interactions can promote anti-tumour immunity through enhanced cytokine production, improved antigen presentation, and modulation of inflammatory signalling pathways.

In parallel, algal-derived compounds can regulate tumour-associated inflammation, a key driver of cancer progression. By suppressing pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-6, and COX-2, mechanisms already described in Section 3.5 , these bioactives may disrupt tumour-promoting signalling networks within the microenvironment.

These immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties position algal-derived compounds as potential adjuncts to immunotherapy, with emerging evidence suggesting their ability to enhance immune surveillance and improve therapeutic responses. Importantly, this aligns with the broader concept of targeting both cancer cells and their surrounding microenvironment, rather than focusing solely on tumour-intrinsic pathways.

4.4.4. Relevance to Unmet Clinical Need and Hard-to-Treat Cancers

Despite being at early developmental stages, several algae-derived compounds have progressed to clinical evaluation and show promise for cancers resistant to conventional therapies.

Fucoidan represents one of the most clinically advanced algae-derived polysaccharides, with multiple trials exploring its role primarily as a supportive therapeutic in oncology. A Phase II randomised, double-blind study in patients with stage III/IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, NCT04597476 , is evaluating fucoidan administered alongside chemoradiotherapy [ 207 ]. This study, sponsored by Hi-Q Marine Biotech, enrolled 119 patients and is designed to assess both clinical outcomes and tolerability, providing one of the most robust indications that fucoidan is progressing beyond preclinical investigation into controlled clinical settings.

More recent trials further expand fucoidan’s application into supportive care and survivorship. A Phase II pilot study in cancer survivors, NCT06295588 , led by the University of Rochester, is investigating an eight-week fucoidan supplementation regimen to reduce fatigue and systemic inflammation [ 208 ]. Similarly, a Phase II trial initiated by the Mayo Clinic, NCT06855524 , is assessing whether fucoidan can mitigate chemotherapy-related fatigue in patients receiving platinum-based regimens for gastrointestinal and gynaecological cancers [ 209 ]. Together, these studies position fucoidan within an emerging paradigm of adjunctive therapies aimed at improving quality of life and immune recovery rather than acting solely as direct cytotoxic agents.

Earlier investigations have also explored fucoidan in the context of tumour-directed therapy and treatment-associated outcomes. In locally advanced rectal cancer, a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled study, NCT04342949 , evaluated fucoidan as an adjunct to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, focusing primarily on quality-of-life endpoints rather than direct tumour response [ 210 ]. While supportive of clinical feasibility, this distinction highlights that much of the current clinical evidence for fucoidan remains centred on symptom management and treatment tolerance.

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a randomised, double-blind trial of oligo-fucoidan, NCT04066660 , was designed to evaluate its role as supportive care in advanced disease [ 211 ]. However, this study was terminated early due to insufficient recruitment following the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring the challenges associated with advancing marine-derived compounds through late-stage clinical evaluation.

Notably, attempts to extend fucoidan into other indications such as non-small-cell lung cancer have not yet translated into active clinical programmes. A pilot randomised study combining fucoidan with platinum-based chemotherapy, NCT03130829 , was withdrawn prior to patient enrolment due to feasibility constraints [ 212 ], indicating that, despite strong preclinical rationale, clinical development remains selective and context-dependent.

Collectively, these trials demonstrate that fucoidan has achieved meaningful clinical traction, particularly in supportive oncology settings. While its direct anticancer efficacy remains to be established in large-scale interventional trials, its immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and potential chemosensitising properties align closely with unmet clinical needs in advanced and treatment-resistant cancers. Importantly, the current clinical landscape suggests that fucoidan may be best positioned as part of combination or supportive strategies, rather than as a standalone cytotoxic agent, reinforcing the need for integrated trial designs and biomarker-driven patient stratification.

Beyond fucoidan, only a limited number of algae-derived compounds have progressed to clinical evaluation, and most remain at early or discontinued stages of development. Kahalalide F, a marine-derived cyclic depsipeptide originally isolated from the green alga Bryopsis spp., represents one of the earliest examples to enter clinical trials. Phase I and II studies demonstrated cytotoxic activity across several tumour types, including androgen-refractory prostate cancer, melanoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer, primarily through induction of G 0 /G 1 cell-cycle arrest and caspase-independent cell death [ 213 , 214 ]. However, clinical development was hindered by dose-limiting toxicities, and no active oncology trials are currently ongoing. Similarly, Irvalec (PM02734), a synthetic marine-derived cyclodepsipeptide structurally related to Kahalalide F, has been evaluated in a Phase I trial in patients with advanced solid tumours ( NCT00884845 ); however, its clinical development has since been discontinued despite initial signs of therapeutic potential [ 215 ]. These outcomes highlight both the potency and translational limitations of marine-derived cytotoxic peptides.

In contrast, phycocyanin, a phycobiliprotein derived primarily from cyanobacteria such as Arthrospira platensis , is being explored within a supportive and nutraceutical framework rather than as a direct anticancer agent. A Phase II clinical study ( NCT05025826 ) is investigating its neuroprotective effects in patients with metastatic cancer receiving chemotherapy, specifically targeting chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy [ 216 ]. This reflects its established antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and underscores a broader translational pathway for algal compounds, where clinical value may lie in reducing treatment-related toxicity and improving patient quality of life.

Collectively, the current clinical landscape indicates that marine-derived algal compounds are beginning to transition into human studies, albeit predominantly within supportive or early-phase contexts; a table of clinical trials and their status is available in Appendix A . While direct tumour-targeting efficacy remains limited, their immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and protective properties align closely with unmet clinical needs in advanced and treatment-resistant cancers. These findings support a strategic repositioning of algal bioactives within combination therapies and supportive-care paradigms, alongside continued optimisation to enable progression towards fully therapeutic applications.

5. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Marine biodiscovery continues to develop as a central pillar of modern biotechnology, yet its successful translation into regulated markets is shaped by interconnected scientific, technical, and policy challenges. Although the marine environment offers an exceptional reservoir of structurally diverse bioactives with therapeutic, cosmetic, nutritional, and regenerative potential, the pathway from ecological discovery to commercial application is often fraught. To better understand these challenges, we convened a small focus group of seven Welsh and Irish SMEs specialising in marine natural products, representing the full innovation pipeline from algae production to medical product development and spanning a range of commercial maturity from pre-revenue start-ups to established companies with over 25 years of experience. Qualitative insights were collected through one-to-one interviews and a semi-structured group discussion.

These translational challenges must be considered within the context of a rapidly expanding global market for marine-derived products, which is driving both innovation and commercial pressure. The global market for algae and marine bioactives reflects steady and diversified growth across multiple high-value sectors. Recent estimates place the global algae products market at approximately USD 5.85–6.06 billion in 2025 (≈EUR 5.2–5.4 billion), expanding at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of ~5.8–6.7% [ 217 , 218 ], while the broader marine bioactives market was valued at around USD 2.4 billion in 2023 (≈EUR 2.1 billion) and is projected to grow at >5.6% CAGR through to 2032 [ 219 ]. Within this landscape, particularly strong demand is observed in high-value segments, including algae-derived omega-3 ingredients (USD 1.19 billion in 2024; 7.2% CAGR) [ 220 ], algae-based skincare products (USD 195 million in 2023; 7.2% CAGR) [ 221 ], and marine-derived pharmaceuticals, which represent the largest opportunity at approximately USD 8.4 billion in 2025 with a projected 5.7% CAGR [ 222 ]. Regulatory developments are also supporting market expansion and competitiveness, with the addition of over 20 algae species to the EU Novel Food Catalogue in 2024 [ 223 ], although market entry in Great Britain remains subject to Food Standards Agency authorisation under assimilated Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 [ 224 ].

Collectively, these trends highlight a robust and scalable market trajectory, in which near-term opportunities in nutraceuticals and cosmetics provide commercially viable entry points capable of funding and de-risking longer-term development of marine-derived therapeutics. The scale, growth, and translational positioning of these application domains are summarised in Figure 2 . However, realising this commercial potential depends on overcoming a series of interconnected translational challenges spanning compound variability, manufacturing, regulatory frameworks, and financing, with variability in marine-derived compounds emerging as a foundational constraint.

5.1. Variability and Standardisation of Marine-Derived Compounds

5.1.1. Variability and Standardisation

Whilst diversity is exciting for bioprospecting and biodiscovery, the intrinsic variability of the marine environment, and therefore marine-derived compounds (as discussed in Section 2 and Section 3 ), presents a persistent translational challenge in health applications where consistency is key [ 225 ]. This is particularly relevant to macroalgae which demonstrate extensive variation in yield and composition with changing seasons and geographic distribution [ 225 ] and are typically wild-harvested or cultivated in situ, thus limiting the control of the diversity drivers. Batch-to-batch variability is demonstrated as fluctuating concentrations of key actives [ 226 ] and trace elements (vitamins and minerals) [ 227 ]; impacting the reproducibility and efficacy [ 228 ] and resulting in negative commercial implications for those looking to develop products.

Discussions with industry partners echo this challenge, noting that obtaining consistent bioactive profiles is already difficult and that regulatory pathways, particularly for nutritional claims, rely heavily on demonstrating reproducible activity and composition. The European Union has attempted to address this bottleneck for food products, adding 20 algae species to its novel food register in 2024, bringing the total to 60 [ 223 ]. Together, these challenges underscore the need for improved cultivation control, validated and accessible analytical pipelines, and harmonised standards to ensure reliable, batch-to-batch consistency of marine biomass and extracts or a need to shift product and business design to accommodate the changing extract profiles.

5.1.2. Heavy Metals and Testing Burdens

As mentioned in Section 4.1 , macroalgae are also prone to the accumulation of heavy metals and toxins and can been used as an indicator for environmental assessments [ 229 ]; similarly, microalgae can be used for bioremediation [ 230 ]. Whilst trace metals such as iron, cadmium, magnesium and iodine are important for human health [ 227 ], studies have shown that the levels of toxic metals (including aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and chromium) in some macroalgal species can easily exceed the WHO recommended guidelines [ 231 ]. The selection of a suitable macroalgal species and geographic location accounting for water quality and water flow rate [ 227 ] can substantially minimise the risks of heavy-metal accumulation, but this needs to be supported by regular batch testing. One company in the focus group shared that testing each harvest of macroalgae for pathogens and heavy metals as part of the sourcing requirements of their clients was cost-prohibitive and led them to stop certain product lines and exports. Annamalai and Kolandhasamy [ 3 ] also highlight a need to standardise the extraction and testing protocols themselves to support better data collection and replicability.

5.1.3. Control Measures and Optimisation

The situation can be significantly different for microalgae, where controlled cultivation and strain selection markedly reduces variability [ 226 ]. Unlike many microorganisms, microalgae can be cultivated under semi-controlled conditions using open pond systems in large-scale volumes (>4000 m 3 ), enabling reproducible biomass generation independent of seasonal variability and a high productivity rate in controlled closed systems such as photobioreactors.

Industrial cultivation systems also allow the optimisation of growth conditions to enhance the production of specific metabolites, supporting their translation into pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and cosmeceutical products [ 7 , 11 ]. For example, the use of green light wavelengths improves the yield of phycobiliproteins from Porphyridium purpureum , whilst under multi-chromatic LED wavelengths the yields of other products such as eicosapentaenoic acid, β -carotene and exopolysaccharides are improved [ 12 ].

5.2. Manufacturing and Commercialisation

5.2.1. Approaches to Commercial Production

Commercial macroalgae harvesting and production have expanded substantially in recent decades, driven by increasing demand for sustainable biomass across food, feed, biorefinery, environmental, and biotechnology sectors. Macroalgae, contributing approximately 28% of total global marine aquaculture output and generating an estimated USD 5 billion annually, represent one of the fastest-growing segments of the blue bio-economy [ 14 ]. Commercial systems in Europe still largely rely on wild harvesting [ 13 , 232 ], although globally 96.6% of algae is cultivated [ 15 ] in coastal farms, nearshore longline systems, and shallow-pond configurations tailored for high biomass yields and low energy inputs [ 14 ].

There is also long history of microalgae biomass exploitation, mainly for biofuel, food and feed applications, and in recent decades for pharmaceutical applications [ 233 ] however, most of those efforts were done using standard well-known commercial microalgae such as Nannochloropsis , Chlorella or Limnospira [ 234 ]. In recent years, several new species of microalgae that have been identified and scaled up to large-scale production in both open and closed systems are providing an entirely new source of bioactive compounds that can be extracted from the produced biomass. There are several examples including the dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae [ 235 , 236 ], the cyanobacteria Leptolyngbya sp. [ 237 , 238 ], and the green microalgae Monoraphidium sp. [ 83 , 239 ].

Seasonal macroalgae harvests and batched microalgae production mean that large amounts of biomass must be processed quickly. In a UK context, there is a distinct lack of infrastructure and processing facilities as they rely on commercial-scale, food-grade machinery which has both a high upfront investment cost and a high operational cost (maintenance and cleaning burden). High-volume processing is only needed for a short period, so some processing sites work through community ownership models or on a rented access basis. Whilst there are still challenges around seasonal demand, in terms of access and the financial sustainability of the facilities themselves, this open innovation approach significantly reduces the barriers to entry for SMEs, boosts their innovation capacity and improves their technical capabilities, which can lead to higher-quality products and specialisation [ 233 ]. Additionally, there is a growing body of research focusing on developing and optimising processing approaches that are faster, cheaper and more energy efficient, whilst maintaining the extract quality, biological activity, stability and composition consistency needed for high-value applications [ 240 ].

5.2.2. Regulatory Considerations

Feedback from the focus group highlighted manufacturing and regulatory burdens as significant barriers to commercialisation across high-value bioproduct classes (nutraceutical, cosmetic, pharmaceutical). Manufacturing complexity interacts with formulation needs, delivery routes, stability, and safety testing requirements, all of which must be addressed through rigorous, standardised quality frameworks. Translation is also slowed by a lack of marine-specific frameworks and safety data and, of course, the need for extensive toxicological, pharmacokinetic, and clinical validation [ 3 ].

The commercialisation of food products comes with its own regulatory constraints. In Europe, both macro- and microalgae are covered by a range of legislation, such as Novel Food Regulations (EU) 2015/2283 (authorization and safety assessment of novel foods), Feed and Food Hygiene Regulations and environmental regulations [ 241 ]. The focus group also highlighted the potential for certain regulations to have hidden impact and commented on the challenges of managing misalignment in international policies as SMEs. Taking iodine as an example, the European Union recently set an upper daily limit at 600 μg/day, five times lower than the level in Japan, which is set at 3000 μg/day [ 242 ]. This constrains product development and marketability, particularly of macroalgae in European markets, shifting business development decisions.

At a local level, environmental legislation, licencing and regulation tends to have the largest impact. Companies participating in the focus group expressed that guidance and licencing is generally welcomed, particularly amongst those sourcing from wild-harvested macroalgae as they want support to ensure they can scale sustainably. At the other end of the scale, policy developments related to the regulation of Digital Sequence Information (DSI) and the new high-seas governance framework under the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement will directly affect how marine genetic resources, sequence data, and derivative bioactives collected from international waters can be accessed, shared, and commercialised with yet-untold impacts on businesses [ 243 ].

5.2.3. Financing Research and Development

As in most sectors, the current investment landscape is very challenging, but translation is particularly difficult because of the substantial early capital needed to drive medical research. Industry professionals warned that long development timelines (up to 10 years and EUR 100M for new biomedicines) demand early “fail-fast” strategies and better screening tools to minimise costs and attrition. Supported pathways for the screening and identification of novel compounds can significantly help new product development, providing insights into the most promising compounds and the most appropriate species and growth conditions. Support is often sourced through public funding in collaboration with academia, a particularly important pathway for smaller companies.

The high resource commitment of medical research means several of the companies interviewed are taking a portfolio business model approach. Many are looking at animal nutrition as the fastest route to develop and commercialise higher value products, before moving onto human nutrition and later pharmaceuticals. Companies are also taking a circular approach from a materials point of view, creating a complementary portfolio of products that enable the use of the whole biomass with a particular focus on biostimulants (fertilisers) and residual fibre at the lowest tiers of functional and monetary value.

5.3. Value of Multidisciplinary Consortia in De-Risking Translation

Collaboration between SMEs, academia, and government agencies (through the triple-helix model of innovation) is an important way to overcome technical and financial risks, building regional innovation ecosystems that advance progress towards business and policy goals [ 244 , 245 , 246 ]. The focus group discussed the highly competitive nature of the current funding landscape, with EU success rates at an average of 12% and some as low as 2% [ 247 ], making it difficult for SMEs to secure grants without strong consortia. Funding, at all scales, also comes with a high administrative burden, and some organisations can be unprepared for, and even surprised by, the project management resources needed to handle complex reporting and deliverables. Additionally, whilst the companies participating in the focus group generally felt comfortable applying for grants, they all had a deep appreciation for the time, complexity and skill needed to write successful applications. To this end some companies employ funding officers (with application writing included in their mandate), whilst many micro-SMEs turn to academics or external consultants to support in this capacity. An overview of the key translational stages, associated bottlenecks, and the role of multidisciplinary consortia in mitigating these risks is presented in Figure 3 .

At the European level, several large-scale initiatives provide concrete examples of how multidisciplinary consortia de-risk marine biodiscovery. The EU-funded EMBRIC (European Marine Biological Research Infrastructure Cluster) brought together multiple European research infrastructures and industry stakeholders to establish integrated workflows for accessing biological, analytical, and data resources, while strengthening links between science and industry and facilitating technology transfer [ 248 , 249 ]. Similarly, the European Marine Biological Resource Centre (EMBRC) operates as a pan-European infrastructure spanning more than 80 marine institutes and participating in over 20 EU-funded projects, providing coordinated access to marine biodiversity, specialised facilities, and transnational research services that support both academic and industrial users [ 250 , 251 ]. Earlier collaborative programmes such as PharmaSea further demonstrated the value of interdisciplinary consortia by integrating academia and industry to address key bottlenecks in marine biodiscovery, including compound isolation, validation, and sustainable supply, ultimately reducing time to market [ 252 , 253 ]. More recently, Horizon Europe projects such as COMBO are addressing critical challenges in scalability and supply through synthetic biology, omics technologies, and advanced cultivation strategies, reinforcing the role of consortia as enablers of translation [ 254 ].

As mentioned in Section 5.2.3 , supported pathways for compound screening and identification can have a transformative impact on product development and commercialisation. The Celtic Advances Life Science Innovation Network (CALIN) was a project funded through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) from 2016 to 2023. It brought together life sciences experts from three Welsh and three Irish Universities to create a supported R&D pipeline. The project supported more than 200 companies, facilitating access testing and expertise to test their products and ideas, and stimulating more than EUR 5 million of private investment to match public support [ 255 ]. Initiatives of this nature demonstrate how structured consortia can effectively de-risk early-stage innovation and accelerate translation.

The focus group also highlighted the importance of national and regional innovation support mechanisms that complement EU-level funding. Institutional programmes such as Enterprise Ireland, alongside the Welsh Government’s Smart Flexible Innovation Support (SFIS), have a strong track record in promoting industry–academia collaboration through targeted funding for feasibility studies and small-to-medium-scale projects (up to approximately GBP 200k) [ 246 ]. These schemes play a crucial role in bridging early-stage funding gaps, enabling SMEs to generate preliminary data, develop partnerships, and position themselves competitively for larger collaborative funding opportunities.

5.4. Future Directions for Marine Biodiscovery Across Oncology, Regeneration, and Skin Applications

Marine-derived compounds are gaining global traction; with around 20 marine-derived natural products currently approved for medicinal use [ 256 , 257 ], the past 10 years have seen a slow but steady increase in the number of approved products with many more natural products undergoing clinical trials [ 258 , 259 ]. However, this is a small drop in the ocean compared to the vast potential of natural products in the marine environment, highlighted by the high success rate of marine natural products; for example, Almaliti and Gerwick [ 257 ] report that 23 marine-inspired agents are in clinical use from a total of 39,238 marine natural products, a success rate nearly nine times better than the industry standard of 15,000:1. This is unsurprising when we consider the vast biodiversity of the ocean, which contains 34 of the ~35 recognised phyla, compared to the 15 phyla represented in terrestrial environments [ 260 ]; however, this scale and variety also constrains the field and reaffirms the need for coordinated translational infrastructures [ 256 ]. Integrating scalable cultivation platforms, predictive preclinical systems (e.g., organoids, advanced skin equivalents), and coordinated funding mechanisms will be critical to enabling these marine bioactives to transition successfully into therapeutics, biomaterials, and next-generation skincare products [ 258 , 259 ].

6. Conclusions

Marine biodiscovery is emerging as a versatile and sustainable platform for biotechnology, supported by the exceptional chemical and functional diversity of marine microalgae and macroalgae. These organisms inhabit dynamic and often extreme environments, which drives production of structurally diverse metabolites involved in ecological defence, signalling and stress adaptation. This biochemical diversity creates opportunities across nutraceutical, cosmetic, regenerative, and anticancer applications. As a sustainable and scalable source of novel bioactive compounds, algae have strong potential to contribute future innovation in health and biotechnology.

A key message of this review is that marine biodiscovery must be aligned with clearly defined translational goals. Application-driven approaches require robust molecular characterisation, mechanistic understanding, and careful evaluation of structure–activity relationships. This is particularly important for compound classes such as fucoidan, ulvan, phlorotannins, and carotenoids, where biological activity is highly dependent on molecular weight distribution, sulphation pattern, degree of polymerisation, stereochemistry and formulation stability. Future progress will therefore depend on integrated frameworks combining controlled cultivation, scalable bioprocessing, validated analytics, and application-specific testing models.

Advances in large-scale microalgal cultivation now support reproducible biomass production and enable metabolite profiles to be tuned under defined culture conditions. In parallel, omics technologies, metabolite fingerprinting, and high-content phenotypic screening are improving the identification of lead compounds and the mapping of their mechanisms of action. Physiologically relevant in vitro and ex vivo models, including 3D skin, organoids, and cancer spheroids, offer further opportunities to assess efficacy, toxicity, and delivery in systems that better reflect human biology. Alongside these scientific advances, environmental sustainability must remain central, ensuring that algal cultivation and harvesting support secure supply chains while protecting marine ecosystems and coastal communities.

Insights from Welsh and Irish SMEs further highlight that scientific innovation must be matched by practical routes to translation. Key barriers include biomass variability, heavy-metal accumulation, processing infrastructure, regulatory hurdles, and the high cost of early-stage research. Collaborative innovation ecosystems linking business, academia, and government will be essential to de-risking early-discovery research, supporting validation and accelerating progression towards regulated markets. This is particularly important for SMEs, where targeted funding and integrated partnerships can help bridge the gap between ecological discovery, preclinical development, and commercial application.

Overall, marine biodiscovery is well positioned to contribute to sustainable health innovation. By aligning discovery with translational need, applying advanced cultivation and analytical technologies, and building collaborative, application-focused research pipelines, algae-derived bioactives can support the development of next-generation products across human health, biotechnology, and the circular bio-economy.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the participating SMEs, whose insights and engagement were instrumental in informing this study.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.G.; Formal analysis (SME interviews), H.M.; Investigation, H.M. (SME interviews); Data curation, H.M.; Writing—Original draft preparation, Z.E.D., V.J.R., P.M., M.M., A.S., J.M.M.A., F.B., C.F.-G. and W.R.; Writing—review and editing, H.M., Z.C. and D.G.; Visualisation, D.G.; Supervision, D.G.; Project administration (manuscript coordination), H.M. and Z.C.; Funding acquisition, Z.C. and D.G. All authors contributed to critical revision of the manuscript and approved the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript: Akt Protein Kinase B AP-1 Activator Protein-1 BBNJ Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction BMDM Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophage BMPs Bone Morphogenic Proteins CAGR Compound Annual Growth Rate CDK Cyclin-Dependent Kinase COX-2 Cyclooxygenase-2 CXCR4 C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4 DGDG Digalactosyldiacylglyceride DGLA Dihomo-γ-Linolenic Acid DSI Digital Sequence Information ECM Extracellular Matrix EGFR Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor EMT Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition EPA Eicosapentaenoic Acid ERDF European Regional Development Fund ERK Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase EU European Union FTIR Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy FSA Food Standards Agency GPx Glutathione Peroxidase HCC Hepatocellular Carcinoma HIF-1α Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1-Alpha HO-1 Heme Oxygenase-1 HPLC-MS High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry IC 50 Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration IFN-γ Interferon-Gamma IGF-1R Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor IL-1β/IL-6 Interleukin-1 Beta/Interleukin-6 iNOS Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase JAK-STAT Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription JNK c-Jun N-terminal Kinase LMF Low-Molecular-Weight Fucoidan LPS Lipopolysaccharide MAAs Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids MAPK/MAPK(s) Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase(s) MGDG Monogalactosyldiacylglyceride MMPs Matrix Metalloproteinases MSCs Mesenchymal Stem Cells mTOR Mammalian Target of Rapamycin NAFLD Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease NF-κB Nuclear Factor Kappa-B NQO1 NAD(P)H Quinone Dehydrogenase 1 NO Nitric Oxide NOX2 NADPH Oxidase 2 NSCLC Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer OA Osteo Arthritis PGE 2 Prostaglandin E 2 PI3K Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase PM Particulate Matter PUFA(s) Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid(s) RCT Randomised Controlled Trial ROS Reactive Oxygen Species SFIS Smart Flexible Innovation Support SME(s) Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise(s) SQDG Sulfoquinovosyldiacylglyceride TAGs Triacylglycerols TGF Transforming Growth Factor TGF-β Transforming Growth Factor Beta TNF-α Tumour Necrosis Factor-Alpha TYR Tyrosinase VEGF/VEGFR2 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/Receptor 2 WT Wild-Type

Appendix A

Table A1
International clinical trials using micro and macro algae extracts for nutrition, oncology, regenerative medicine and skincare applications.

Therapeutic CategoryTrial Name/AcronymAlgae SourceActive Compound/DerivativeTrial IDStatusPhaseYearLocationKey Ref(s)
Cardiovascular/Gut HealthCALGUT—Spirulina and Gelidium corneum on cardiovascular risk and gut microbiomeArthrospira platensis (microalga) and Gelidium corneum (red macroalga)Spirulina biomass; Gelidium corneum extractNCT07173062RecruitingN/A2025–2026Portugal[ 261 ]
Gut HealthHimanthalia elongata brown seaweed on gut microbiota in overweight adultsHimanthalia elongata (brown macroalga)Whole biomass (encapsulated)Published 2025—NutrientsCompletedRCT2024–2025Spain[ 262 ]
Carrageenan food additive and the human gut microbiomeRed macroalgae (carrageenan-producing species)Carrageenan (sulphated polysaccharide)NCT06738329RecruitingN/A2024–2025UK[ 263 ]
Tetrasol microalgae extract on gut health, anxiety and immune functionTetraselmis sp. (microalgae)Tetrasol extractNCT06425094CompletedPhase I2024–2025USA[ 264 ]
InflammationSpirulina protective/regenerative effects in hepatectomy liver injuryArthrospira platensis (Spirulina, microalgae)Whole biomassNCT07263217RecruitingN/A2025–2028China[ 265 ]
ESSAY—Spirulina supplement for benign thyroid nodulesArthrospira platensis (Spirulina, microalga)Whole biomassNCT03535974CompletedN/A2018–2020Romania[ 266 ]
Fucoidan supplement for fatigue and inflammation in cancer survivorsFucus vesiculosus and Undaria pinnatifida (brown macroalgae)FucoidanNCT06295588RecruitingPhase II2025–2026USA[ 208 ]
Metabolic/ObesitySpirulina platensis + calorie restriction in obese menArthrospira platensis (Spirulina, microalgae)Whole biomassNCT06076161CompletedN/A2023–2024Indonesia[ 267 ]
Spirulina supplementation in overweight/obese adultsArthrospira platensis (Spirulina, microalgae)Whole biomassNCT02993627CompletedN/A2017–2019Iran[ 268 ]
ALGAENERGY—Spirulina and Chlorella on metabolic syndrome biomarkersArthrospira platensis and Chlorella vulgaris (microalgae)Whole biomassNCT05343858CompletedN/A2022–2023Spain[ 269 ]
Algae-oil-fortified soymilk vs. capsules—EPA/DHA bioavailabilityUnknownEPA + DHANCT05802797ActiveEarly Phase I2023–2026USA[ 270 ]
NutritionSpirulina as daily nutritional supplement in Cambodian pre-school childrenArthrospira platensis (Spirulina, microalgae)Whole biomassBarennes et al. 2022CompletedRCT (crossover)2019–2021Cambodia/France[ 271 ]
NovAL—nutrient bioavailability from Chlorella and NannochloropsisChlorella pyrenoidosa + Nannochloropsis salina (microalgae)Whole-biomass micronutrients (iron, iodine, carotenoids, B12)NCT04567823CompletedN/A2021–2022Germany[ 272 ]
ALG—algae oil immune response and lipid bioavailabilitySchizochytrium sp. (Microalage, including strain FCC3204)DHA (Origins™ 550-Y (Fermentalg) and Oleo H-02 (Microalgas))NCT07086573UpcomingN/A2026Netherlands[ 273 ]
GOBO 2—bioavailability of EPA + DHA from two microalgal sources vs. fish oilSchizochytrium sp. (microalgae)DHA + EPA (life’s™ Omega O1035DS nTG)NCT07241377RecruitingPhase III2025–2026Australia[ 274 ]
GOBO—bioavailability of EPA + DHA: microalgal vs. fish oilSchizochytrium sp. (microalgae)DHA + EPA (life’s™ Omega O1035DS)NCT06629103ActivePhase IV2024–2025Australia[ 275 ]
DHA from algae supplement in vegetariansSchizochytrium sp. (microalgae)DHA-ONCT04278482CompletedN/A2020–2021Spain[ 276 ]
Algae-oil-fortified soymilk vs. capsules—EPA/DHA bioavailabilityUnknownEPA + DHANCT05802797ActiveEarly Phase I2023–2026USA[ 270 ]
OncologyFucoidan safety and efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neckBrown macroalgae (fucoidan-producing species)Fucoidan (MW ~20,000 Da)NCT04597476UnknownPhase II2020–ongoingTaiwan[ 207 ]
Auxiliary effects of fucoidan for locally advanced rectal cancer patients (neoadjuvant CCRT)Brown macroalgae (fucoidan-producing species)FucoidanNCT04342949RecruitingN/A2018–ongoingTaiwan[ 210 ]
Oligo-fucoidan in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)Brown macroalgae (fucoidan-producing species)Oligo-fucoidan (MW 500–800 Da)NCT04066660TerminatedN/A2019–2022Taiwan[ 211 ]
Oligo-fucoidan QoL adjuvant in NSCLC patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapyBrown macroalgae (fucoidan-producing species)Oligo-fucoidanNCT03130829WithdrawnN/AWithdrawn—insufficient target populationTaiwan[ 212 ]
Kahalalide F clinical development programmeBryopsis sp. (green macroalgae)Kahalalide F (cyclic depsipeptide)Multiple (5 trials)TerminatedPhase I/II2001–2010Spain[ 213 ]
Elisidepsin (Irvalec ® /PM02734) + erlotinib in advanced solid tumoursBryopsis sp. (green macroalga)—synthetic kahalalide F derivativeElisidepsin/PM02734 (Irvalec ® )—synthetic cyclodepsipeptideNCT00884845TerminatedPhase I2009–2012 (clinical development discontinued)Spain; multinational EU[ 215 ]
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smouldering multiple myeloma (NUTRIVENTION-3)Microalgae (unknown sp.)Algae-derived omega-3 fatty acids (DHA/EPA) combined with curcuminNCT05640843RecruitingN/A2022-2026USA[ 277 ]
Brentuximab Vedotin (Adcetris ® )Symploca sp./ Lyngbya majuscula (Cyanobacteria/microalga)Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE)—dolastatin 10 analogueADCETRIS/BV (FDA Approved 2011)ApprovedApproved2009–2011 (approval)USA[ 278 ]
Oncology/InflammationPhycocyanin (Spirulina-derived) vs. chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in metastatic gastric cancerArthrospira platensis (Spirulina, microalga)Phycocyanin (biliprotein pigment)NCT05025826RecruitingN/A2021–ongoingChina[ 216 ]
Fucoidan for preventing chemotherapy-related fatigue in GI/GYN cancer (Mayo Clinic)Brown macroalgae (fucoidan-producing species)Oligo-fucoidanNCT06855524RecruitingPhase II2025–ongoingUSA[ 209 ]
Regenerative MedicineAlginate-encapsulated human islet cell implants in peritoneal cavity—pilot in Type 1 diabetesBrown macroalgae (alginate-producing species)Alginate microcapsule-encapsulated human islet cellsNCT01379729CompletedN/A (Pilot)~2011–2013Belgium[ 279 ]
DIABECELL ® Phase I/IIa—alginate-encapsulated porcine islets xenotransplantation in Type 1 diabetesBrown macroalgae (alginate-producing species)Alginate microencapsulation of porcine islets (DIABECELL ® device)NCT00940173CompletedPhase I/II2009–2012New Zealand[ 280 ]
DIABECELL ® Phase IIb—alginate-encapsulated porcine islets safety and efficacy in Type 1 diabetesBrown macroalgae (alginate-producing species)Alginate microencapsulation of porcine islets (DIABECELL ® device)NCT01736228CompletedPhase II2012–2017New Zealand/Russia[ 281 ]
Beta-Air bioartificial pancreas (macro-encapsulated islets) implantation in Type 1 diabetesBrown macroalgae (alginate-producing species)Alginate hydrogel macro-encapsulation device (Beta-Air) containing human pancreatic isletsNCT02064309ActivePhase I/II2014–ongoingSweden/Israel[ 282 ]
Fucoidan (galactofucan sulphate) oral ingestion and haematopoietic progenitor cell (CD34+) mobilisationBrown macroalgae (fucoidan-producing species)Galactofucan sulphate/fucoidanIrhimeh et al. 2007 (PubMed 17533053)CompletedPilot clinical trial~2005–2006 (published 2007)Australia[ 283 ]
SkincareDunaliella bardawil (9-cis-β-carotene) adjuvant to NB-UVB phototherapy in plaque psoriasisDunaliella bardawil (green microalga)9-cis-β-carotene-rich Dunaliella bardawil powderNCT01628081UnknownPhase III2012–unknownIsrael[ 284 ]
Gracilaria algae 3% topical cream vs. clobetasol 0.05% in plaque psoriasisGracilaria sp. (red macroalga)Phlorotannins/anti-inflammatory polyphenolsShatalebi et al. 2020 (PubMed 32951292)CompletedN/A~2018–2019 (published 2020)Iran[ 285 ]
SXRG84 ( Ulva sp. sulphated polysaccharide) in inflammatory skin conditions—Bio-Belly 2 sub-studyUlva sp. (green macroalga)Sulphated xylorhamnoglucuronan (SXRG84)Roach et al. 2023CompletedN/A~2021–2022 (published 2023)Australia[ 286 ]
PCA—Algae formulations (UMAC and golden-brown algae) on psoriasis skin lesions, lipids and inflammationUnique Marine Algae Concentrate (UMAC) and Golden-brown algae (microalgae blend)UMAC whole-cell concentrate; whole biomassNCT01045395CompletedPhase I2009–2012Canada[ 287 ]

References

1. Nurkolis F. Marine bioactives: Pioneering sustainable solutions for advanced cosmetics and therapeutics Pharmacol. Res. 2025 218 107868 10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107868 40684894

2. Ghosh S. Sarkar T. Pati S. Kari Z.A. Edinur H.A. Chakraborty R. Novel Bioactive Compounds From Marine Sources as a Tool for Functional Food Development Front. Mar. Sci. 2022 9 832957 10.3389/fmars.2022.832957

3. Annamalai A. Kolandhasamy P. Marine macroalgal metabolites in microbial modulation for next-generation microecological therapeutics Discov. Biotechnol. 2026 3 7 10.1007/s44340-025-00047-6

4. Caroppo C. Pagliara P. Microalgae: A promising future Microorganisms 2022 10 1488 10.3390/microorganisms10081488 35893546 PMC9331014

5. Lalegerie F. Gager L. Stiger-Pouvreau V. Connan S. The stressful life of red and brown seaweeds on the temperate intertidal zone: Effect of abiotic and biotic parameters on the physiology of macroalgae and content variability of particular metabolites Advances in Botanical Research Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2020 Volume 95 247 287

6. Sarıtaş S. Kalkan A.E. Yılmaz K. Gurdal S. Göksan T. Witkowska A.M. Lombardo M. Karav S. Biological and nutritional applications of microalgae Nutrients 2024 17 93 10.3390/nu17010093 39796527 PMC11722913

7. Romano G. Costantini M. Sansone C. Lauritano C. Ruocco N. Ianora A. Marine microorganisms as a promising and sustainable source of bioactive molecules Mar. Environ. Res. 2017 128 58 69 10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.05.002 27160988

8. Lomartire S. Cotas J. Pacheco D. Marques J.C. Pereira L. Gonçalves A.M.M. Environmental Impact on Seaweed Phenolic Production and Activity: An Important Step for Compound Exploitation Mar. Drugs 2021 19 245 10.3390/md19050245 33926129 PMC8146014

9. Cadar E. Popescu A. Dragan A.-M.-L. Pesterau A.-M. Pascale C. Anuta V. Prasacu I. Velescu B.S. Tomescu C.L. Bogdan-Andreescu C.F. Bioactive Compounds of Marine Algae and Their Potential Health and Nutraceutical Applications: A Review Mar. Drugs 2025 23 152 10.3390/md23040152 40278274 PMC12029074

10. Villegas-Valencia M. González-Portela R.E. de Freitas B.B. Al Jahdali A. Romero-Villegas G.I. Malibari R. Kapoore R.V. Fuentes-Grünewald C. Lauersen K.J. Cultivation of the polyextremophile Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D during summer conditions on the coast of the Red Sea and its adaptation to hypersaline sea water Front. Microbiol. 2023 14 1157151 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1157151 37152750 PMC10158843

11. Mansour A.T. Ashour M. Alprol A.E. Alsaqufi A.S. Aquatic plants and aquatic animals in the context of sustainability: Cultivation techniques, integration, and blue revolution Sustainability 2022 14 3257 10.3390/su14063257

12. Coward T. Fuentes-Grünewald C. Silkina A. Oatley-Radcliffe D.L. Llewellyn G. Lovitt R.W. Utilising light-emitting diodes of specific narrow wavelengths for the optimization and co-production of multiple high-value compounds in Porphyridium purpureum Bioresour. Technol. 2016 221 607 615 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.093 27693726

13. Mac Monagail M. Cornish L. Morrison L. Araújo R. Critchley A.T. Sustainable harvesting of wild seaweed resources Eur. J. Phycol. 2017 52 371 390 10.1080/09670262.2017.1365273

14. Nazir M. Roy K. Saha A. Saha D. Enhancing Sustainability with Macroalgae: Driving Economic Growth and Environmental Stewardship to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals Water Air Soil Pollut. 2025 236 1014 10.1007/s11270-025-08561-3

15. FAO In Brief to The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. Blue Transformation in Action FAO Rome, Italy 2024

16. Ahmad A. Ashraf S.S. Sustainable food and feed sources from microalgae: Food security and the circular bioeconomy Algal Res. 2023 74 103185 10.1016/j.algal.2023.103185

17. McCree K.J. The action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants Agric. Meteorol. 1971 9 191 216 10.1016/0002-1571(71)90022-7

18. Pliego-Cortés H. Bedoux G. Boulho R. Taupin L. Freile-Pelegrin Y. Bourgougnon N. Robledo D. Stress tolerance and photoadaptation to solar radiation in Rhodymenia pseudopalmata (Rhodophyta) through mycosporine-like amino acids, phenolic compounds, and pigments in an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture system Algal Res. 2019 41 101542 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101542

19. Jadhav K. Singh S.B. Barage S. Marine algal pigments: Potent neuroprotective agents for translational therapeutics Discov. Ocean. 2025 2 51 10.1007/s44289-025-00091-4

20. Llewellyn C.A. Greig C. Silkina A. Kultschar B. Hitchings M.D. Farnham G. Mycosporine-like amino acid and aromatic amino acid transcriptome response to UV and far-red light in the cyanobacterium Chlorogloeopsis fritschii PCC 6912 Sci. Rep. 2020 10 20638 10.1038/s41598-020-77402-6 33244119 PMC7693272

21. Fuentes-Grünewald C. Bayliss C. Zanain M. Pooley C. Scolamacchia M. Silkina A. Evaluation of batch and semi-continuous culture of Porphyridium purpureum in a photobioreactor in high latitudes using Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy for monitoring biomass composition and metabolites production Bioresour. Technol. 2015 189 357 363 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.042 25913882

22. Bedoux G. Bourgougnon N. Bioactivity of Secondary Metabolites from Macroalgae The Algae World Sahoo D. Seckbach J. Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands 2015 391 401

23. Zhang H. Wang Y. Zhang L. Wang Z. Zhu Z. Long L. Protein and metabolite acclimations to temperature variability in a calcareous green macroalga Halimeda macroloba Front. Mar. Sci. 2025 12 1543591 10.3389/fmars.2025.1543591

24. Adams J. Ross A. Anastasakis K. Hodgson E. Gallagher J. Jones J. Donnison I. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of the bioenergy feedstock Laminaria digitata for thermochemical conversion Bioresour. Technol. 2011 102 226 234 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.152 20685112

25. Retta B. Iovinella M. Ciniglia C. Significance and applications of the Thermo-Acidophilic microalga Galdieria sulphuraria (Cyanidiophytina, Rhodophyta) Plants 2024 13 1786 10.3390/plants13131786 38999626 PMC11243675

26. Lopes C. Obando J.M.C. Santos T.C.d. Cavalcanti D.N. Teixeira V.L. Abiotic factors modulating metabolite composition in brown algae (phaeophyceae): Ecological impacts and opportunities for bioprospecting of bioactive compounds Mar. Drugs 2024 22 544 10.3390/md22120544 39728119 PMC11677006

27. Gylle A.M. Nygård C.A. Ekelund N.G. Desiccation and salinity effects on marine and brackish Fucus vesiculosus L. (Phaeophyceae) Phycologia 2009 48 156 164 10.2216/08-45.1

28. Marinho-Soriano E. Fonseca P. Carneiro M. Moreira W. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of two tropical seaweeds Bioresour. Technol. 2006 97 2402 2406 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.014 16311028

29. Ben-Amotz A. Avron M. On the Factors Which Determine Massive β-Carotene Accumulation in the Halotolerant Alga Dunaliella bardawil Plant Physiol. 1983 72 593 597 10.1104/pp.72.3.593 16663050 PMC1066285

30. Pandit P.R. Fulekar M.H. Karuna M.S.L. Effect of salinity stress on growth, lipid productivity, fatty acid composition, and biodiesel properties in Acutodesmus obliquus and Chlorella vulgaris Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017 24 13437 13451 10.1007/s11356-017-8875-y 28386901

31. Bartley M.L. Boeing W.J. Corcoran A.A. Holguin F.O. Schaub T. Effects of salinity on growth and lipid accumulation of biofuel microalga Nannochloropsis salina and invading organisms Biomass Bioenergy 2013 54 83 88 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.026

32. Rogers L. Micro-algal biotechnology FEBS Letters Borowitzka M.A. Borowitzka L.J. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hoboken, NJ, USA 1988 Volume 238 222 223

33. Heiser S. Amsler C.D. Brothers C.J. Amsler M.O. Shilling A.J. Bozarth L. Davis C.B. McClintock J.B. Baker B.J. Who cares more about chemical defenses—The macroalgal producer or its main grazer? J. Chem. Ecol. 2022 48 416 430 10.1007/s10886-022-01358-2 35353298

34. Cikoš A.-M. Šubarić D. Roje M. Babić J. Jerković I. Jokić S. Recent advances on macroalgal pigments and their biological activities (2016–2021) Algal Res. 2022 65 102748 10.1016/j.algal.2022.102748

35. Torequl Islam M. Quispe C. Herrera-Bravo J. Rahaman M.M. Hossain R. Sarkar C. Raihan M.A. Chowdhury M.M. Uddin S.J. Shilpi J.A. Activities and molecular mechanisms of diterpenes, diterpenoids, and their derivatives in rheumatoid arthritis Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022 2022 4787643 10.1155/2022/4787643 35368757 PMC8975657

36. Lane A.L. Mular L. Drenkard E.J. Shearer T.L. Engel S. Fredericq S. Fairchild C.R. Prudhomme J. Le Roch K. Hay M.E. Ecological leads for natural product discovery: Novel sesquiterpene hydroquinones from the red macroalga Peyssonnelia sp. Tetrahedron 2010 66 455 461 10.1016/j.tet.2009.11.042 20661312 PMC2908918

37. Kamei Y. Sueyoshi M. Hayashi K.-I. Terada R. Nozaki H. The novel anti-Propionibacterium acnes compound, Sargafuran, found in the marine brown alga Sargassum macrocarpum J. Antibiot. 2009 62 259 263 10.1038/ja.2009.25 19329987

38. Cortés Y. Hormazábal E. Leal H. Urzúa A. Mutis A. Parra L. Quiroz A. Novel antimicrobial activity of a dichloromethane extract obtained from red seaweed Ceramium rubrum (Hudson) (Rhodophyta: Florideophyceae) against Yersinia ruckeri and Saprolegnia parasitica, agents that cause diseases in salmonids Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2014 17 126 131 10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.04.005

39. Dahms H.U. Dobretsov S. Antifouling Compounds from Marine Macroalgae Mar. Drugs 2017 15 265 10.3390/md15090265 28846625 PMC5618404

40. Behzadnia A. Moosavi-Nasab M. Oliyaei N. Anti-biofilm activity of marine algae-derived bioactive compounds Front. Microbiol. 2024 15 1270174 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1270174 38680918 PMC11055458

41. Garcia-Parra J. Fuentes-Grünewald C. Gonzalez D. Therapeutic potential of microalgae-derived bioactive metabolites is influenced by different large-scale culture strategies Mar. Drugs 2022 20 627 10.3390/md20100627 36286451 PMC9605503

42. Lopes D. Rey F. Melo T.P. Moreira A.S. Marques F. Abreu M.H. Domingues P. Domingues M.R. Mapping the Polar Lipidome of Macroalgae using LC-MS-Based Approaches for Add-Value Applications Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2023 125 2300005 10.1002/ejlt.202300005

43. Van Ginneken V.J. Helsper J.P. de Visser W. van Keulen H. Brandenburg W.A. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in various macroalgal species from north Atlantic and tropical seas Lipids Health Dis. 2011 10 104 10.1186/1476-511X-10-104 21696609 PMC3131239

44. Jagusch H. Baumeister T.U. Pohnert G. Mammalian-like inflammatory and pro-resolving oxylipins in marine algae ChemBioChem 2020 21 2419 2424 10.1002/cbic.202000178 32239741 PMC7496315

45. Barbosa M. Valentão P. Andrade P.B. Biologically active oxylipins from enzymatic and nonenzymatic routes in macroalgae Mar. Drugs 2016 14 23 10.3390/md14010023 26805855 PMC4728519

46. Plouguerné E. da Gama B.A. Pereira R.C. Barreto-Bergter E. Glycolipids from seaweeds and their potential biotechnological applications Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014 4 174 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00174 25566511 PMC4269193

47. Meinita M.D.N. Harwanto D. Tirtawijaya G. Negara B.F.S.P. Sohn J.-H. Kim J.-S. Choi J.-S. Fucosterol of marine macroalgae: Bioactivity, safety and toxicity on organism Mar. Drugs 2021 19 545 10.3390/md19100545 34677444 PMC8539623

48. Adarme-Vega T.C. Thomas-Hall S.R. Schenk P.M. Towards sustainable sources for omega-3 fatty acids production Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014 26 14 18 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.08.003 24607804

49. Pulz O. Gross W. Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004 65 635 648 10.1007/s00253-004-1647-x 15300417

50. Orefice I. Balzano S. Romano G. Sardo A. Amphidinium spp. as a source of antimicrobial, antifungal, and anticancer compounds Life 2023 13 2164 10.3390/life13112164 38004303 PMC10671881

51. Tanna B. Mishra A. Nutraceutical Potential of Seaweed Polysaccharides: Structure, Bioactivity, Safety, and Toxicity Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019 18 817 831 10.1111/1541-4337.12441 33336929

52. Kostas E.T. Adams J.M. Ruiz H.A. Durán-Jiménez G. Lye G.J. Macroalgal biorefinery concepts for the circular bioeconomy: A review on biotechnological developments and future perspectives Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021 151 111553 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111553

53. Tomić S.L. Babić Radić M.M. Vuković J.S. Filipović V.V. Nikodinovic-Runic J. Vukomanović M. Alginate-based hydrogels and scaffolds for biomedical applications Mar. Drugs 2023 21 177 10.3390/md21030177 36976226 PMC10055882

54. Rahman M.M. Shahid M.A. Hossain M.T. Sheikh M.S. Rahman M.S. Uddin N. Rahim A. Khan R.A. Hossain I. Sources, extractions, and applications of alginate: A review Discov. Appl. Sci. 2024 6 443 10.1007/s42452-024-06151-2

55. Alfinaikh R.S. Alamry K.A. Hussein M.A. Sustainable and biocompatible hybrid materials-based sulfated polysaccharides for biomedical applications: A review RSC Adv. 2025 15 4708 4767 10.1039/D4RA07277D 39958265 PMC11826415

56. Coombe D.R. Parish C.R. Ramshaw I.A. Snowden J.M. Analysis of the inhibition of tumour metastasis by sulphated polysaccharides Int. J. Cancer 1987 39 82 88 10.1002/ijc.2910390115 2878892

57. Wu X. Chen D. Effects of sulfated polysaccharides on tumour biology West Indian Med. J. 2006 55 270 10.1590/S0043-31442006000400009 17249315

58. Kalimuthu S. Kim S.-K. Fucoidan, A Sulfated Polysaccharides from Brown Algae as Therapeutic Target for Cancer Handbook of Anticancer Drugs from Marine Origin Kim S.-K. Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland 2015 145 164

59. Khan W. Rayirath U.P. Subramanian S. Jithesh M.N. Rayorath P. Hodges D.M. Critchley A.T. Craigie J.S. Norrie J. Prithiviraj B. Seaweed Extracts as Biostimulants of Plant Growth and Development J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009 28 386 399 10.1007/s00344-009-9103-x

60. Menshova R.V. Shevchenko N.M. Imbs T.I. Zvyagintseva T.N. Malyarenko O.S. Zaporoshets T.S. Besednova N.N. Ermakova S.P. Fucoidans from brown alga Fucus evanescens: Structure and biological activity Front. Mar. Sci. 2016 3 129 10.3389/fmars.2016.00129

61. Akl F.M. El-Sheekh M.M. Makhlof M.E. Ahmed S.I. Antimicrobial, antidiabetic, antiviral, and antioxidant activities of fucoidan extracted from the brown seaweed Padina pavonica BMC Biotechnol. 2025 25 70 10.1186/s12896-025-01004-1 40634858 PMC12243346

62. Jabeen F. Zile A. Ahmad R. Mir S. Awwad N.S. Ibrahium H.A. Carrageenan: Structure, properties and applications with special emphasis on food science RSC Adv. 2025 15 22035 22062 10.1039/D5RA03296B 40584756 PMC12203331

63. Zarrintaj P. Manouchehri S. Ahmadi Z. Saeb M.R. Urbanska A.M. Kaplan D.L. Mozafari M. Agarose-based biomaterials for tissue engineering Carbohydr. Polym. 2018 187 66 84 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.060 29486846

64. Carpena M. Garcia-Perez P. Garcia-Oliveira P. Chamorro F. Otero P. Lourenço-Lopes C. Cao H. Simal-Gandara J. Prieto M.A. Biological properties and potential of compounds extracted from red seaweeds Phytochem. Rev. 2023 22 1509 1540 10.1007/s11101-022-09826-z PMC9247959 35791430

65. Li C. Tang T. Du Y. Jiang L. Yao Z. Ning L. Zhu B. Ulvan and Ulva oligosaccharides: A systematic review of structure, preparation, biological activities and applications Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2023 10 66 10.1186/s40643-023-00690-z 38647949 PMC10991135

66. Kidgell J.T. Magnusson M. de Nys R. Glasson C.R.K. Ulvan: A systematic review of extraction, composition and function Algal Res. 2019 39 101422 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101422

67. Lakshmi D.S. Sankaranarayanan S. Gajaria T.K. Li G. Kujawski W. Kujawa J. Navia R. A Short Review on the Valorization of Green Seaweeds and Ulvan: FEEDSTOCK for Chemicals and Biomaterials Biomolecules 2020 10 991 10.3390/biom10070991 32630631 PMC7407860

68. Ma A.C. Chen Z. Wang T. Song N. Yan Q. Fang Y.C. Guan H.S. Liu H.B. Isolation of the molecular species of monogalactosyldiacylglycerols from brown edible seaweed Sargassum horneri and their inhibitory effects on triglyceride accumulation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014 62 11157 11162 10.1021/jf503068n 25363514

69. Foseid L. Devle H. Naess-Andresen C.F. Ekeberg D. Laminaria hyperborea as a Source of Valuable Glyceroglycolipids—A Characterization of Galactosyldiacilglycerols in Stipe and Blade by HPLC-MS/MS AppliedChem 2022 2 185 198 10.3390/appliedchem2040013

70. Domozych D.S. Ciancia M. Fangel J.U. Mikkelsen M.D. Ulvskov P. Willats W.G. The Cell Walls of Green Algae: A Journey through Evolution and Diversity Front. Plant Sci. 2012 3 82 10.3389/fpls.2012.00082 22639667 PMC3355577

71. de Arruda M.C.S. da Silva M.R.O.B. Cavalcanti V.L.R. Brandao R.M.P.C. Viana Marques D.d.A. de Lima L.R.A. Porto A.L.F. Bezerra R.P. Antitumor lectins from algae: A systematic review Algal Res. 2023 70 102962 10.1016/j.algal.2022.102962

72. Raposo M.F.d.J. De Morais R.M.S.C. Bernardo de Morais A.M.M. Bioactivity and Applications of Sulphated Polysaccharides from Marine Microalgae Mar. Drugs 2013 11 233 252 10.3390/md11010233 23344113 PMC3564169

73. Talyshinsky M.M. Souprun Y.Y. Huleihel M.M. Anti-viral activity of red microalgal polysaccharides against retroviruses Cancer Cell Int. 2002 2 8 10.1186/1475-2867-2-8 12204093 PMC140136

74. Gongi W. Cordeiro N. Pinchetti J.L.G. Ouada H.B. Functional, rheological, and antioxidant properties of extracellular polymeric substances produced by a thermophilic cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya sp. J. Appl. Phycol. 2022 34 1423 1434 10.1007/s10811-022-02695-1

75. Osório C. Machado S. Peixoto J. Bessada S. Pimentel F.B.C. Alves R. Oliveira M.B.P.P. Pigments Content (Chlorophylls, Fucoxanthin and Phycobiliproteins) of Different Commercial Dried Algae Separations 2020 7 33 10.3390/separations7020033

76. Manzoor M.F. Afraz M.T. Yılmaz B.B. Adil M. Arshad N. Goksen G. Ali M. Zeng X.-A. Recent progress in natural seaweed pigments: Green extraction, health-promoting activities, techno-functional properties and role in intelligent food packaging J. Agric. Food Res. 2024 15 100991 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.100991

77. Yordi G. Martínez P.E. Radice A. Scalvenzi M. Abreu-Naranjo L. Uriarte R. Santana E. Matos L. Joao M. Seaweeds as Source of Bioactive Pigments with Neuroprotective and/or Anti-Neurodegenerative Activities: Astaxanthin and Fucoxanthin Mar. Drugs 2024 22 327 10.3390/md22070327 39057436 PMC11277739

78. Lee S. Lee E.J. Lee G.M. Yun J.-H. Yoo W. Inhibitory effect of fucoidan on TNF-α-induced inflammation in human retinal pigment epithelium cells Front. Nutr. 2023 10 1162934 10.3389/fnut.2023.1162934 37125026 PMC10130517

79. Cardoso S.M. Pereira O.R. Seca A.M.L. Pinto D.C.G.A. Silva A.M.S. Seaweeds as Preventive Agents for Cardiovascular Diseases: From Nutrients to Functional Foods Mar. Drugs 2015 13 6838 6865 10.3390/md13116838 26569268 PMC4663556

80. Pal Singh I. Bharate S.B. Phloroglucinol compounds of natural origin Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006 23 558 591 10.1039/b600518g 16874390

81. Pangestuti R. Kim S.-K. Biological activities and health benefit effects of natural pigments derived from marine algae J. Funct. Foods 2011 3 255 266 10.1016/j.jff.2011.07.001

82. Guedes A.C. Amaro H.M. Malcata F.X. Microalgae as sources of carotenoids Mar. Drugs 2011 9 625 644 10.3390/md9040625 21731554 PMC3124977

83. Yadav K. Kumar S. Nikalje G.C. Rai M.P. Combinatorial effect of multiple abiotic factors on up-regulation of carotenoids and lipids in Monoraphidium sp. for pharmacological and nutraceutical applications Appl. Sci. 2023 13 6107 10.3390/app13106107

84. Dhaouafi J. Romdhani M. Deracinois B. Flahaut C. Balti R. Nedjar N. Analysis and Characterization of Novel Bioactive Peptides Derived from Red Macroalgae Protein Hydrolysis Using Peptidomics and Bioinformatics Approaches Waste Biomass Valorization 2025 16 911 925 10.1007/s12649-024-02715-w

85. Pimentel F.B. Alves R.C. Harnedy P.A. FitzGerald R.J. Oliveira M.B.P.P. Macroalgal-derived protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides: Enzymatic release and potential health enhancing properties Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019 93 106 124 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.006

86. Seca A.M.L. Pinto D.C.G.A. Overview on the Antihypertensive and Anti-Obesity Effects of Secondary Metabolites from Seaweeds Mar. Drugs 2018 16 237 10.3390/md16070237 30011911 PMC6070913

87. Thiviya P. Gamage A. Gama-Arachchige N.S. Merah O. Madhujith T. Seaweeds as a Source of Functional Proteins Phycology 2022 2 216 243 10.3390/phycology2020012

88. Barcellos Marini M. Rodrigues de Freitas W. Lacerda da Silva Machado F. Correa Ramos Leal I. Ribeiro Soares A. Masahiko Kanashiro M. Frazão Muzitano M. Cytotoxic activity of halogenated sesquiterpenes from Laurencia dendroidea Phytother. Res. 2018 32 1119 1125 10.1002/ptr.6052 29480520

89. Shahidi F. Ambigaipalan P. Novel functional food ingredients from marine sources Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015 2 123 129 10.1016/j.cofs.2014.12.009

90. Yaghoubzadeh Z. Safari R. Extraction of bioactive peptides from Chlorella vulgaris using enzymatic hydrolysis: A green natural antioxidant Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2025 31 33 10.1007/s10989-025-10692-4

91. Martínez K.A. Lauritano C. Druka D. Romano G. Grohmann T. Jaspars M. Martín J. Díaz C. Cautain B. de la Cruz M. Amphidinol 22, a new cytotoxic and antifungal amphidinol from the dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae Mar. Drugs 2019 17 385 10.3390/md17070385 31252576 PMC6669446

92. Minhas L.A. Kaleem M. Farooqi H.M.U. Kausar F. Waqar R. Bhatti T. Aziz S. Jung D.W. Mumtaz A.S. Algae-derived bioactive compounds as potential pharmaceuticals for cancer therapy: A comprehensive review Algal Res. 2024 78 103396 10.1016/j.algal.2024.103396

93. El-Seedi H.R. Refaey M.S. Elias N. El-Mallah M.F. Albaqami F.M.K. Dergaa I. Du M. Salem M.F. Tahir H.E. Dagliaa M. Marine natural products as a source of novel anticancer drugs: An updated review (2019–2023) Nat. Prod. Bioprospecting 2025 15 13 10.1007/s13659-024-00493-5 PMC11759743 39853457

94. Ravindran J. Gupta N. Agrawal M. Bala Bhaskar A.S. Lakshmana Rao P.V. Modulation of ROS/MAPK signaling pathways by okadaic acid leads to cell death via, mitochondrial mediated caspase-dependent mechanism Apoptosis 2011 16 145 161 10.1007/s10495-010-0554-0 21082355

95. El-Sherbiny G.M. Kalaba M.H. Marine Carotenoids: A Critical Review of Bioactivities, Bioavailability, and Therapeutic Potential BioMed Res. Int. 2025 2025 4147524 10.1155/bmri/4147524 41473736 PMC12746009

96. Kim K.-N. Heo S.-J. Yoon W.-J. Kang S.-M. Ahn G. Yi T.-H. Jeon Y.-J. Fucoxanthin inhibits the inflammatory response by suppressing the activation of NF-κB and MAPKs in lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2010 649 369 375 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.09.032 20868674

97. Heo S.-J. Yoon W.-J. Kim K.-N. Ahn G.-N. Kang S.-M. Kang D.-H. Affan A. Oh C. Jung W.-K. Jeon Y.-J. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory effect of fucoxanthin isolated from brown algae in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010 48 2045 2051 10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.003 20457205

98. Farruggia C. Kim M.-B. Bae M. Lee Y. Pham T.X. Yang Y. Han M.J. Park Y.-K. Lee J.-Y. Astaxanthin exerts anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in macrophages in NRF2-dependent and independent manners J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018 62 202 209 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.09.005 30308382

99. Sugawara T. Baskaran V. Tsuzuki W. Nagao A. Brown Algae Fucoxanthin Is Hydrolyzed to Fucoxanthinol during Absorption by Caco-2 Human Intestinal Cells and Mice J. Nutr. 2002 132 946 951 10.1093/jn/132.5.946 11983819

100. Zhao D. Yu D. Kim M. Gu M.-Y. Kim S.-M. Pan C.-H. Kim G.-H. Chung D. Effects of temperature, light, and pH on the stability of fucoxanthin in an oil-in-water emulsion Food Chem. 2019 291 87 93 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.002 31006475

101. Snell T.W. Carberry J. Astaxanthin Bioactivity Is Determined by Stereoisomer Composition and Extraction Method Nutrients 2022 14 1522 10.3390/nu14071522 35406135 PMC9002770

102. Catarino M.D. Silva A. Cruz M.T. Mateus N. Silva A.M.S. Cardoso S.M. Phlorotannins from Fucus vesiculosus: Modulation of Inflammatory Response by Blocking NF-κB Signaling Pathway Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 6897 10.3390/ijms21186897 32962250 PMC7554702

103. Kim A.R. Lee M.-S. Shin T.-S. Hua H. Jang B.-C. Choi J.-S. Byun D.-S. Utsuki T. Ingram D. Kim H.-R. Phlorofucofuroeckol A inhibits the LPS-stimulated iNOS and COX-2 expressions in macrophages via inhibition of NF-κB, Akt, and p38 MAPK Toxicol. Vitr. 2011 25 1789 1795 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.09.012 21963823

104. Besednova N.N. Andryukov B.G. Zaporozhets T.S. Kuznetsova T.A. Kryzhanovsky S.P. Ermakova S.P. Galkina I.V. Shchelkanov M.Y. Molecular Targets of Brown Algae Phlorotannins for the Therapy of Inflammatory Processes of Various Origins Mar. Drugs 2022 20 243 10.3390/md20040243 35447916 PMC9025421

105. El Asri S. Ben Mrid R. Zouaoui Z. Roussi Z. Ennoury A. Nhiri M. Chibi F. Advances in structural modification of fucoidans, ulvans, and carrageenans to improve their biological functions for potential therapeutic application Carbohydr. Res. 2025 549 109358 10.1016/j.carres.2024.109358 39718272

106. Ye J. Chen D. Ye Z. Huang Y. Zhang N. Lui E.M.K. Xue C. Xiao M. Fucoidan Isolated from Saccharina japonica Inhibits LPS-Induced Inflammation in Macrophages via Blocking NF-κB, MAPK and JAK-STAT Pathways Mar. Drugs 2020 18 328 32599714 10.3390/md18060328 PMC7345355

107. Apostolova E. Lukova P. Baldzhieva A. Delattre C. Molinié R. Petit E. Elboutachfaiti R. Nikolova M. Iliev I. Murdjeva M. Structural Characterization and In Vivo Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Fucoidan from Cystoseira crinita (Desf.) Borry Mar. Drugs 2022 20 714 10.3390/md20110714 36421993 PMC9693085

108. Karuppusamy S. Rajauria G. Fitzpatrick S. Lyons H. McMahon H. Curtin J. Tiwari B.K. O’Donnell C. Biological Properties and Health-Promoting Functions of Laminarin: A Comprehensive Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies Mar. Drugs 2022 20 772 10.3390/md20120772 36547919 PMC9780867

109. Ahn J.H. Kim D.W. Park C.W. Kim B. Sim H. Kim H.S. Lee T.-K. Lee J.-C. Yang G.E. Her Y. Laminarin Attenuates Ultraviolet-Induced Skin Damage by Reducing Superoxide Anion Levels and Increasing Endogenous Antioxidants in the Dorsal Skin of Mice Mar. Drugs 2020 18 345 10.3390/md18070345 32629814 PMC7401269

110. Conde T.A. Zabetakis I. Tsoupras A. Medina I. Costa M. Silva J. Neves B. Domingues P. Domingues M.R. Microalgal Lipid Extracts Have Potential to Modulate the Inflammatory Response: A Critical Review Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 22 9825 10.3390/ijms22189825 34576003 PMC8471354

111. Jayawardena T.U. Sanjeewa K.K.A. Lee H.-G. Nagahawatta D.P. Yang H.-W. Kang M.-C. Jeon Y.-J. Particulate Matter-Induced Inflammation/Oxidative Stress in Macrophages: Fucosterol from Padina boryana as a Potent Protector, Activated via NF-κB/MAPK Pathways and Nrf2/HO-1 Involvement Mar. Drugs 2020 18 628 10.3390/md18120628 33317054 PMC7763233

112. Lopes G. Daletos G. Proksch P. Andrade P.B. Valentão P. Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Monogalactosyl Diacylglycerols and a Monoacylglycerol from the Edible Brown Seaweed Fucus spiralis Linnaeus Mar. Drugs 2014 12 1406 1418 10.3390/md12031406 24619274 PMC3967218

113. Novichkova E. Chumin K. Eretz-Kdosha N. Boussiba S. Gopas J. Cohen G. Khozin-Goldberg I. DGLA from the Microalga Lobosphaera Incsa P127 Modulates Inflammatory Response, Inhibits iNOS Expression and Alleviates NO Secretion in RAW264.7 Murine Macrophages Nutrients 2020 12 2892 10.3390/nu12092892 32971852 PMC7551185

114. Li Y. Ye H. Wang T. Wang P. Liu R. Li Y. Tian Y. Zhang J. Characterization of Low Molecular Weight Sulfate Ulva Polysaccharide and its Protective Effect against IBD in Mice Mar. Drugs 2020 18 499 10.3390/md18100499 33003577 PMC7601132

115. Matin M. Koszarska M. Atanasov A.G. Król-Szmajda K. Jóźwik A. Stelmasiak A. Hejna M. Bioactive Potential of Algae and Algae-Derived Compounds: Focus on Anti-Inflammatory, Antimicrobial, and Antioxidant Effects Molecules 2024 29 4695 10.3390/molecules29194695 39407623 PMC11477577

116. Zhang R. Ren Y. Ren T. Yu Y. Li B. Zhou X. Marine-Derived Antioxidants: A Comprehensive Review of Their Therapeutic Potential in Oxidative Stress-Associated Diseases Mar. Drugs 2025 23 223 10.3390/md23060223 40559632 PMC12193789

117. Pereira L. Valado A. Neurological Benefits of Seaweed-Derived Compounds Mar. Drugs 2026 24 31 10.3390/md24010031 41590728 PMC12843011

118. Mohibbullah M. Haque M.N. Sohag A.A.M. Hossain M.T. Zahan M.S. Uddin M.J. Hannan M.A. Moon I.S. Choi J.-S. A Systematic Review on Marine Algae-Derived Fucoxanthin: An Update of Pharmacological Insights Mar. Drugs 2022 20 279 10.3390/md20050279 35621930 PMC9146768

119. Tan P.X. Thiyagarasaiyar K. Tan C.-Y. Jeon Y.-J. Nadzir M.S.M. Wu Y.-J. Low L.-E. Atanasov A.G. Ming L.C. Liew K.B. Algae-Derived Anti-Inflammatory Compounds against Particulate Matters-Induced Respiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review Mar. Drugs 2021 19 317 10.3390/md19060317 34070821 PMC8227865

120. Lukova P. Apostolova E. Baldzhieva A. Murdjeva M. Kokova V. Fucoidan from Ericaria crinita Alleviates Inflammation in Rat Paw Edema, Downregulates Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels, and Shows Antioxidant Activity Biomedicines 2023 11 2511 10.3390/biomedicines11092511 37760952 PMC10526391

121. Kim T.E. Son S.-U. Shin K.-S. Low-molecular-weight ulvan prepared from the Korean seaweed Ulva pertusa enhances immune responses via signaling pathways, short chain fatty acids, and G-protein coupled receptors Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025 318 145143 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.145143 40499871

122. Yoo M.-S. Shin J.-S. Choi H.-E. Cho Y.-W. Bang M.-H. Baek N.-I. Lee K.-T. Fucosterol isolated from Undaria pinnatifida inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced production of nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines via the inactivation of nuclear factor-κB and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in RAW264.7 macrophages Food Chem. 2012 135 967 975 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.039 22953812

123. Kirindage K.G.I.S. Jayasinghe A.M.K. Han E.-J. Jee Y. Kim H.-J. Do S.G. Fernando I.P.S. Ahn G. Fucosterol Isolated from Dietary Brown Alga Sargassum horneri Protects TNF-α/IFN-γ-Stimulated Human Dermal Fibroblasts Via Regulating Nrf2/HO-1 and NF-κB/MAPK Pathways Antioxidants 2022 11 1429 10.3390/antiox11081429 35892631 PMC9394315

124. Kumar A. Soratur A. Kumar S. Venmathi Maran B.A. A Review of Marine Algae as a Sustainable Source of Antiviral and Anticancer Compounds Macromol 2025 5 11 10.3390/macromol5010011

125. Oliveira de Almeida P.D. Bozorgzadeh S.A. de Silva L.A. Golbashirzadeh M. Anticancer Potential of Marine Algae from the Chabahar Coast: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Applications Phytomed. Plus 2025 100943 10.1016/j.phyplu.2025.100943

126. Wang S.K. Li Y. White W.L. Lu J. Extracts from New Zealand Undaria pinnatifida Containing Fucoxanthin as Potential Functional Biomaterials against Cancer in Vitro J. Funct. Biomater. 2014 5 29 42 10.3390/jfb5020029 24956438 PMC4099972

127. Wang J. Chen S. Xu S. Yu X. Ma D. Hu X. Cao X. In Vivo Induction of Apoptosis by Fucoxanthin, a Marine Carotenoid, Associated with Down-Regulating STAT3/EGFR Signaling in Sarcoma 180 (S180) Xenografts-Bearing Mice Mar. Drugs 2012 10 2055 2068 10.3390/md10092055 23118721 PMC3475273

128. Qu J. Sun Y. Yang L. Niu X. Li L. Fucoxanthin prevents cell growth and induces apoptosis in endometrial cancer HEC-1A cells by the inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2022 36 e23027 10.1002/jbt.23027 35266250

129. Ahn J.-H. Yang Y.-I. Lee K.-T. Choi J.-H. Dieckol, isolated from the edible brown algae Ecklonia cava, induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells and inhibits tumor xenograft growth J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2015 141 255 268 10.1007/s00432-014-1819-8 25216701 PMC11823525

130. Thanh T.T.T. Quach T.M.T. Nguyen T.N. Vu Luong D. Bui M.L. Tran T.T.V. Structure and cytotoxic activity of ulvan extracted from green seaweed Ulva lactuca Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016 93 695 702 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.040 27637450

131. Abdelrheem D.A. Abd El-Mageed H.R. Mohamed H.S. Rahman A.A. Elsayed K.N.M. Ahmed S.A. Bis-indole alkaloid caulerpin from a new source Sargassum platycarpum: Isolation, characterization, in vitro anticancer activity, binding with nucleobases by DFT calculations and MD simulation J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021 39 5137 5147 10.1080/07391102.2020.1784285 32579063

132. Agena R. Cortés-Sánchez A.D.J. Hernández-Sánchez H. Álvarez-Salas L.M. Martínez-Rodríguez O.P. García V.H.R. Jaramillo Flores M.E. Pro-Apoptotic Activity and Cell Cycle Arrest of Caulerpa sertularioides against SKLU-1 Cancer Cell in 2D and 3D Cultures Molecules 2023 28 4361 10.3390/molecules28114361 37298837 PMC10254354

133. Ebrahimi Nigjeh S. Yusoff F.M. Mohamed Alitheen N.B. Rasoli M. Keong Y.S. Omar A.R.b. Cytotoxic Effect of Ethanol Extract of Microalga, Chaetoceros calcitrans, and Its Mechanisms in Inducing Apoptosis in Human Breast Cancer Cell Line BioMed Res. Int. 2013 2013 783690 10.1155/2013/783690 23509778 PMC3591159

134. Sanniyasi E. Gopal R.K. Damodharan R. Arumugam A. Sampath Kumar M. Senthilkumar N. Anbalagan M. In vitro anticancer potential of laminarin and fucoidan from Brown seaweeds Sci. Rep. 2023 13 14452 10.1038/s41598-023-41327-7 37660108 PMC10475116

135. Ghahtan N. Dehghan N. Ullah M. Khoradmehr A. Habibi H. Nabipour I. Baghban N. From seaweed to healing: The potential of fucoidan in wound therapy Nat. Prod. Res. 2025 39 1345 1358 10.1080/14786419.2024.2358387 38804629

136. Zaitseva O.O. Sergushkina M.I. Khudyakov A.N. Polezhaeva T.V. Solomina O.N. Seaweed sulfated polysaccharides and their medicinal properties Algal Res. 2022 68 102885 10.1016/j.algal.2022.102885

137. Kim Y.R. Park S.-y. Kim J.Y. Therapeutic potential of seaweed extracts: In vitro and in vivo studies on alleviating inflammation and enhancing intestinal barrier function Food Biosci. 2024 59 103774 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.103774

138. Statha D. Papaioannou A. Kikionis S. Kostaki M. Sfiniadakis I. Vitsos A. Anastassopoulou J. Ioannou E. Roussis V. Rallis M.C. Healing Potential of the Marine Polysaccharides Carrageenan and Ulvan on Second-Degree Burns J. Funct. Biomater. 2024 15 257 10.3390/jfb15090257 39330232 PMC11433208

139. Yang C. Dwan C. Wimmer B.C. Ahamed S.K. James F. Thinley J. Wilson R. Johnson L. Caruso V. Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Effects of Undaria pinnatifida Fucoidan Mar. Drugs 2025 23 350 10.3390/md23090350 41003318 PMC12471492

140. Casas-Agustench P. Mínguez S. Brookes Z. Bescos R. Edible Algae Reduce Blood Pressure in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2025 38 e70095 10.1111/jhn.70095 40726022 PMC12304617

141. Łagowska K. Jurgoński A. Mori M. Yamori Y. Murakami S. Ito T. Toda T. Pieczyńska-Zając J.M. Bajerska J. Effects of dietary seaweed on obesity-related metabolic status: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Nutr. Rev. 2024 83 e116 e130 10.1093/nutrit/nuae042 38749056

142. Wu J.Y. Tso R. Teo H.S. Haldar S. The utility of algae as sources of high value nutritional ingredients, particularly for alternative/complementary proteins to improve human health Front. Nutr. 2023 10 1277343 10.3389/fnut.2023.1277343 37904788 PMC10613476

143. Assunção J. Amaro H.M. Malcata F.X. Guedes A.C. Factorial Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Phycocyanin from Synechocystis salina: Towards a Biorefinery Approach Life 2022 12 1389 10.3390/life12091389 36143425 PMC9505276

144. Wang S. Zhang B. Chang X. Zhao H. Zhang H. Zhao T. Qi H. Potential use of seaweed polysaccharides as prebiotics for management of metabolic syndrome: A review Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024 64 7707 7727 10.1080/10408398.2023.2191135 36971135

145. Deivayanai V.C. Saravanan A. Ragini Y.P. Vickram A.S. Harnessing marine algae for sustainable nutraceuticals and food chemistry: A comprehensive review on biomass production and applications Sustain. Chem. One World 2026 9 100192 10.1016/j.scowo.2026.100192

146. Silkina A. Gayo-Peláez J.I. Fernandes F. Fuentes-Grünewald C. Kapoore R.V. Tang K.W. From waste to wealth: Coupling different nutritional modes of Scenedesmus obliquus for waste remediation and algal product development J. Appl. Phycol. 2025 37 1003 1012 10.1007/s10811-024-03438-0

147. Araújo R. Vázquez Calderón F. Sánchez López J. Azevedo I.C. Bruhn A. Fluch S. Garcia Tasende M. Ghaderiardakani F. Ilmjärv T. Laurans M. Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy Front. Mar. Sci. 2021 7 626389 10.3389/fmars.2020.626389

148. Silkina A. Flynn K. Llewellyn C. Bayliss C. Standard Operating Procedures for Analytical Methods and Data Collection in Support of Pilot-Scale Cultivation of Microalgae. Public Output Report WP1A3.01 of the EnAlgae Project. 2020; Volume 4 Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11329/1283 (accessed on 22 March 2026)

149. Fonseca S. Amaral M.N. Reis C.P. Custodio L. Marine Natural Products as Innovative Cosmetic Ingredients Mar. Drugs 2023 21 170 10.3390/md21030170 36976219 PMC10054431

150. Siahaan E.A. Agusman Pangestuti R. Shin K.H. Kim S.K. Potential Cosmetic Active Ingredients Derived from Marine By-Products Mar. Drugs 2022 20 734 10.3390/md20120734 36547881 PMC9787341

151. Pangestuti R. Shin K.H. Kim S.K. Anti-Photoaging and Potential Skin Health Benefits of Seaweeds Mar. Drugs 2021 19 172 10.3390/md19030172 33809936 PMC8004118

152. Lawrence K.P. Gacesa R. Long P.F. Young A.R. Molecular photoprotection of human keratinocytes in vitro by the naturally occurring mycosporine-like amino acid palythine Br. J. Dermatol. 2018 178 1353 1363 10.1111/bjd.16125 29131317 PMC6032870

153. Lawrence K.P. Long P.F. Young A.R. Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids for Skin Photoprotection Curr. Med. Chem. 2018 25 5512 5527 10.2174/0929867324666170529124237 28554325 PMC6446518

154. Waditee-Sirisattha R. Kageyama H. Protective effects of mycosporine-like amino acid-containing emulsions on UV-treated mouse ear tissue from the viewpoints of antioxidation and antiglycation J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2021 223 112296 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112296 34450363

155. Thevanayagam H. Mohamed S.M. Chu W.L. Assessment of UVB-photoprotective and antioxidative activities of carrageenan in keratinocytes J. Appl. Phycol. 2014 26 1813 1821 10.1007/s10811-013-0207-0

156. Li J. Xie L. Qin Y. Liang W.H. Mo M.Q. Liu S.L. Liang F. Wang Y. Tan W. Liang Y. Effect of laminarin polysaccharide on activity of matrix metalloproteinase in photoaging skin Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2013 38 2370 2373 24199574

157. Sanjeewa K.K.A. Bioactive properties and potential cosmeceutical applications of phlorotannins isolated from brown seaweeds: A review J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2016 162 100 105 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.06.027 27362368

158. Arguelles E. Sapin A.B. Bioprospecting of Turbinaria ornata for cosmetic application J. Int. Soc. Southeast Asian Agric. Sci. 2020 26 30 41

159. Chintong S. Phatvej W. Rerk-Am U. Waiprib Y. Klaypradit W. In Vitro Antioxidant, Antityrosinase, and Cytotoxic Activities of Astaxanthin from Shrimp Waste Antioxidants 2019 8 128 10.3390/antiox8050128 31085994 PMC6562539

160. Ju X. Cheng S. Li H. Xu X. Wang Z. Du M. Tyrosinase inhibitory effects of the peptides from fish scale with the metal copper ions chelating ability Food Chem. 2022 390 133146 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133146 35551025

161. Park J.H. Choi S.H. Park S.J. Lee Y.J. Park J.H. Song P.H. Cho C.M. Ku S.K. Song C.H. Promoting Wound Healing Using Low Molecular Weight Fucoidan in a Full-Thickness Dermal Excision Rat Model Mar. Drugs 2017 15 112 10.3390/md15040112 28387729 PMC5408258

162. Sellimi S. Maalej H. Rekik D.M. Benslima A. Ksouda G. Hamdi M. Sahnoun Z. Li S. Nasri M. Hajji M. Antioxidant, antibacterial and in vivo wound healing properties of laminaran purified from Cystoseira barbata seaweed Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018 119 633 644 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.171 30063934

163. Spagolla Napoleao Tavares R. Maria-Engler S.S. Colepicolo P. Debonsi H.M. Schafer-Korting M. Marx U. Gaspar L.R. Zoschke C. Skin Irritation Testing beyond Tissue Viability: Fucoxanthin Effects on Inflammation, Homeostasis, and Metabolism Pharmaceutics 2020 12 136 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020136 32033492 PMC7076544

164. Cieza A. Causey K. Kamenov K. Hanson S.W. Chatterji S. Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 Lancet 2020 396 2006 2017 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0 33275908 PMC7811204

165. Pittenger M.F. Mackay A.M. Beck S.C. Jaiswal R.K. Douglas R. Mosca J.D. Moorman M.A. Simonetti D.W. Craig S. Marshak D.R. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells Science 1999 284 143 147 10.1126/science.284.5411.143 10102814

166. Friedenstein A.J. Piatetzky-Shapiro I.I. Petrakova K.V. Osteogenesis in transplants of bone marrow cells Development 1966 16 381 390 10.1242/dev.16.3.381 5336210

167. Wakitani S. Goto T. Pineda S.J. Young R.G. Mansour J.M. Caplan A.I. Goldberg V.M. Mesenchymal cell-based repair of large, full-thickness defects of articular cartilage J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1994 76 579 592 10.2106/00004623-199404000-00013 8150826

168. Barry F. MSC Therapy for Osteoarthritis: An Unfinished Story J. Orthop. Res. 2019 37 1229 1235 10.1002/jor.24343 31081558

169. Murphy J.M. Fink D.J. Hunziker E.B. Barry F.P. Stem cell therapy in a caprine model of osteoarthritis Arthritis Rheum. 2003 48 3464 3474 10.1002/art.11365 14673997

170. Wen W. Yang L. Wang X. Zhang H. Wu F. Xu K. Chen S. Liao Z. Fucoidan promotes angiogenesis and accelerates wound healing through AKT/Nrf2/HIF-1α signalling pathway Int. Wound J. 2023 20 3606 3618 10.1111/iwj.14239 37203309 PMC10588368

171. Sulastri E. Lesmana R. Zubair M.S. Abdelwahab Mohammed A.F. Elamin K.M. Wathoni N. Ulvan/Silver nanoparticle hydrogel films for burn wound dressing Heliyon 2023 9 e18044 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18044 37483826 PMC10362238

172. Millotti G. Lagast J. Jurman J. Paliaga P. Laffleur F. Ulvan as an underrated material for wound dressings: A review Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025 319 145113 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.145113 40494465

173. Stoppel W.L. White J.C. Horava S.D. Henry A.C. Roberts S.C. Bhatia S.R. Terminal sterilization of alginate hydrogels: Efficacy and impact on mechanical properties J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2014 102 877 884 10.1002/jbm.b.33070 24259507 PMC8218599

174. Huang Y. Peng S. Chen Y. Chu B. Agarose Hydrogels for Bone Tissue Engineering, from Injectables to Bioprinting Gels 2025 11 255 10.3390/gels11040255 40277691 PMC12027395

175. Salati M.A. Khazai J. Tahmuri A.M. Samadi A. Taghizadeh A. Taghizadeh M. Zarrintaj P. Ramsey J.D. Habibzadeh S. Seidi F. Agarose-Based Biomaterials: Opportunities and Challenges in Cartilage Tissue Engineering Polymers 2020 12 1150 10.3390/polym12051150 32443422 PMC7285176

176. Wang X. Wang Y. Gou W. Lu Q. Peng J. Lu S. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in bone regeneration and fracture repair: A review Int. Orthop. 2013 37 2491 2498 10.1007/s00264-013-2059-2 23948983 PMC3843208

177. Kangari P. Talaei-Khozani T. Razeghian-Jahromi I. Razmkhah M. Mesenchymal stem cells: Amazing remedies for bone and cartilage defects Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020 11 492 10.1186/s13287-020-02001-1 33225992 PMC7681994

178. Campos F. Bonhome-Espinosa A.B. Chato-Astrain J. Sánchez-Porras D. García-García Ó.D. Carmona R. López-López M.T. Alaminos M. Carriel V. Rodriguez I.A. Evaluation of Fibrin-Agarose Tissue-Like Hydrogels Biocompatibility for Tissue Engineering Applications Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020 8 00596 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00596 PMC7308535 32612984

179. Zheng Y. Fang S. Liu N. Zhang T. Huang Y. Li L. Tian Y. Hu X. Ji Y. Guo Y. Fucoidan in cancer therapy: From biomedical application to medicinal chemistry approach J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2025 36 116 10.1007/s10856-025-06962-8 41343091 PMC12689777

180. Huang L. Shen M. Morris G.A. Xie J. Sulfated polysaccharides: Immunomodulation and signaling mechanisms Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019 92 1 11 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.08.008

181. Dumville J.C. O’Meara S. Deshpande S. Speak K. Alginate dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013 2013 Cd009110 10.1002/14651858.CD009110.pub3 23799857 PMC7111427

182. Ijaz U. Sohail M. Usman Minhas M. Khan S. Hussain Z. Kazi M. Ahmed Shah S. Mahmood A. Maniruzzaman M. Biofunctional Hyaluronic Acid/κ-Carrageenan Injectable Hydrogels for Improved Drug Delivery and Wound Healing Polymer 2022 14 376 10.3390/polym14030376 PMC8840380 35160366

183. Barbu A. Neamtu B. Zăhan M. Iancu G.M. Bacila C. Mireșan V. Current Trends in Advanced Alginate-Based Wound Dressings for Chronic Wounds J. Pers. Med. 2021 11 890 10.3390/jpm11090890 34575668 PMC8471591

184. Alberts A. Tudorache D.-I. Niculescu A.-G. Grumezescu A.M. Advancements in Wound Dressing Materials: Highlighting Recent Progress in Hydrogels, Foams, and Antimicrobial Dressings Gels 2025 11 123 10.3390/gels11020123 39996666 PMC11854827

185. Thomas A. Harding K.G. Moore K. Alginates from wound dressings activate human macrophages to secrete tumour necrosis factor-alpha Biomaterials 2000 21 1797 1802 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00072-7 10905462

186. Kim B.S. Yang S.S. You H.K. Shin H.I. Lee J. Fucoidan-induced osteogenic differentiation promotes angiogenesis by inducing vascular endothelial growth factor secretion and accelerates bone repair J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2018 12 e1311 e1324 10.1002/term.2509 28714275

187. Hamza H.M. Malik M.M. Asad M. Ali S. Awan A.A. Advances in orthopedic implants: The role of nanotechnology in enhancing performance and longevity Regen. Med. Rep. 2025 2 15 21 10.4103/REGENMED.REGENMED-D-24-00024

188. Kimble A. Hauschild J. McDonnell G. Affinity and Inactivation of Bacterial Endotoxins for Medical Device Materials Biomed. Instrum. Technol. 2023 57 153 162 10.2345/0899-8205-57.4.153 38170935 PMC10764065

189. Martin L.J. Fucoxanthin and Its Metabolite Fucoxanthinol in Cancer Prevention and Treatment Mar. Drugs 2015 13 4784 4798 10.3390/md13084784 26264004 PMC4557004

190. Vujović T. Paradžik T. Babić Brčić S. Piva R. Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential of Algae-Derived Compounds in Hematological Malignancies Cancers 2025 17 318 10.3390/cancers17020318 39858100 PMC11763723

191. Ahmed S.A. Mendonca P. Messeha S.S. Oriaku E.T. Soliman K.F.A. The Anticancer Effects of Marine Carotenoid Fucoxanthin through Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PI3K)-AKT Signaling on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Molecules 2024 29 61 10.3390/molecules29010061 PMC10779870 38202644

192. Almeida T.P. Ramos A.A. Ferreira J. Azqueta A. Rocha E. Bioactive Compounds from Seaweed with Anti-Leukemic Activity: A Mini-Review on Carotenoids and Phlorotannins Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2020 20 39 53 10.2174/1389557519666190311095655 30854962

193. Yang L. Wang P. Wang H. Li Q. Teng H. Liu Z. Yang W. Hou L. Zou X. Fucoidan Derived from Undaria pinnatifida Induces Apoptosis in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma SMMC-7721 Cells via the ROS-Mediated Mitochondrial Pathway Mar. Drugs 2013 11 1961 1976 10.3390/md11061961 23752353 PMC3721216

194. Fernando I.P.S. Sanjeewa K.K.A. Lee H.G. Kim H.-S. Vaas A.P.J.P. De Silva H.I.C. Nanayakkara C.M. Abeytunga D.T.U. Lee D.-S. Lee J.-S. Fucoidan Purified from Sargassum polycystum Induces Apoptosis through Mitochondria-Mediated Pathway in HL-60 and MCF-7 Cells Mar. Drugs 2020 18 196 10.3390/md18040196 32276359 PMC7230577

195. Park H.-K. Kim I.-H. Kim J. Nam T.-J. Induction of apoptosis and the regulation of ErbB signaling by laminarin in HT-29 human colon cancer cells Int. J. Mol. Med. 2013 32 291 295 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1409 23739740 PMC3776715

196. Pradhan B. Bhuyan P.P. Ki J.-S. Immunomodulatory, Antioxidant, Anticancer, and Pharmacokinetic Activity of Ulvan, a Seaweed-Derived Sulfated Polysaccharide: An Updated Comprehensive Review Mar. Drugs 2023 21 300 10.3390/md21050300 37233494 PMC10223415

197. Bhattacharyya S. Borthakur A. Dudeja P.K. Tobacman J.K. Carrageenan Induces Cell Cycle Arrest in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells in Vitro123 J. Nutr. 2008 138 469 475 10.1093/jn/138.3.469 18287351 PMC4887287

198. Kang M.-H. Kim I.-H. Nam T.-J. Phloroglucinol induces apoptosis through the regulation of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor signaling pathways in human colon cancer HT-29 cells Int. J. Oncol. 2014 45 1036 1042 10.3892/ijo.2014.2521 24970012 PMC4121399

199. Zhang G. Zhang Z. Liu Z. Scytonemin inhibits cell proliferation and arrests cell cycle through downregulating Plk1 activity in multiple myeloma cells Tumor Biol. 2013 34 2241 2247 10.1007/s13277-013-0764-5 23584897

200. Dalisay D.S. Tenebro C.P. Sabido E.M. Suarez A.F.L. Paderog M.J.V. Reyes-Salarda R. Saludes J.P. Marine-Derived Anticancer Agents Targeting Apoptotic Pathways: Exploring the Depths for Novel Cancer Therapies Mar. Drugs 2024 22 114 10.3390/md22030114 38535455 PMC10972102

201. Eren E. Watts N.R. Sackett D.L. Wingfield P.T. Conformational changes in tubulin upon binding cryptophycin-52 reveal its mechanism of action J. Biol. Chem. 2021 297 101138 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101138 34461087 PMC8456064

202. Ulagesan S. Nam T.-J. Choi Y.-H. Extraction and Purification of R-Phycoerythrin Alpha Subunit from the Marine Red Algae Pyropia Yezoensis and Its Biological Activities Molecules 2021 26 6479 10.3390/molecules26216479 34770894 PMC8587297

203. Pang M. Qu P. Gao C.-L. Wang Z.-L. Yessotoxin induces apoptosis in HL7702 human liver cells Mol. Med. Rep. 2012 5 211 216 10.3892/mmr.2011.606 21964741

204. Robbins P. Zhang L. Elsallabi O. Soto-Palma C. Bartz J. Salekeen R. Nunes A. Xu W. Lee K. Hughes B. Fucoidans are senotherapeutics that enhance SIRT6-dependent DNA repair Res. Sq. 2025 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6613032/v1

205. Li W. Xue D. Xue M. Zhao J. Liang H. Liu Y. Sun T. Fucoidan inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via regulation of the HIF-1α pathway in mammary cancer cells under hypoxia Oncol. Lett. 2019 18 330 338 10.3892/ol.2019.10283 31289504 PMC6539587

206. Fitton J.H. Therapies from Fucoidan; Multifunctional Marine Polymers Mar. Drugs 2011 9 1731 1760 10.3390/md9101731 22072995 PMC3210604

207. NCT04597476 C.T. A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Clinical Effect and Safety of Fucoidan in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck 2020 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04597476 (accessed on 18 March 2026)

208. NCT06295588 C.T. Minimizing Fatigue and Inflammation in Survivors of Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of the Seaweed Supplement Fucoidan 2024 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06295588 (accessed on 18 March 2026)

209. NCT06855524 C.T. Fucoidan for Patients with Chemotherapy-Related Fatigue: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study 2025 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06855524 (accessed on 18 March 2026)

210. NCT04342949 C.T. A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Study to Investigate the Auxiliary Effects of Fucoidan in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Who Receive Combined Radio-chemotherapy Before Surgery 2020 Available online: https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.12 (accessed on 18 March 2026)

211. NCT04066660 C.T. Study of Oligo-Fucoidan in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) 2019 Available online: https://www.centerwatch.com/clinical-trials/listings/NCT04066660/study-of-oligo-fucoidan-in-advanced-hepatocellular-carcinoma-hcc (accessed on 18 March 2026)

212. NCT03130829 C.T. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel, Pilot Study to Evaluate the Quality of Life Improvement of Oral Oligo Fucoidan as an Adjuvant in Subjects Receiving Platinum-Based Chemotherapy with NSCLC 2017 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03130829 (accessed on 18 March 2026)

213. Pardo B. Paz-Ares L. Tabernero J. Ciruelos E. García M. Salazar R.N. López A. Blanco M.A. Nieto A. Jimeno J. Phase I Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Kahalalide F Administered Weekly as a 1-Hour Infusion to Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Clin. Cancer Res. 2008 14 1116 1123 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4366 18281545

214. Gao J. Hamann M.T. Chemistry and Biology of Kahalalides Chem. Rev. 2011 111 3208 3235 10.1021/cr100187n 21480581 PMC4895206

215. NCT00884845 C.T. Phase I Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalating Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Trial of PM02734 Administered in Combination with Erlotinib in Patients with Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors 2009 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00884845 (accessed on 18 March 2026)

216. NCT05025826 C.T. Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating Neurotoxicity in Patients with Metastatic Gastro Intestinal Cancer Taking Phycocare ® or Placebo During Oxaliplatin Based Chemotherapy 2021 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05025826 (accessed on 18 March 2026)

217. Choudhury N.R. Algae Products Market (2025–2035) Available online: https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/algae-products-market (accessed on 18 March 2026)

218. Swar V. Algae Products Market Size, Share and Trends 2025 to 2034 (Report 7150) Available online: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/algae-products-market (accessed on 18 March 2026)

219. Pulidindi K. Ahuja K. Bio-Marine Ingredients Market Size & Share 2024–2032 (Report GMI9127) Available online: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/bio-marine-ingredients-market (accessed on 18 March 2026)

220. Techsci Research Algae Omega-3 Ingredients Market Available online: https://www.techsciresearch.com/report/algae-omega-3-ingredients-market/18860.html (accessed on 18 March 2026)

221. Grand View Research Algae Skincare Products Market (2024–2030) (Report GVR-4-68040-169-8) Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/algae-skincare-products-market-report (accessed on 18 March 2026)

222. Fact.MR Marine-Derived Pharmaceuticals Market 2025 to 2035 (Report FACT8711MR) Available online: https://www.factmr.com/report/marine-derived-pharmaceuticals-market (accessed on 18 March 2026)

223. Europen Comission Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries More than 20 Algae Species Can Now be Sold as Food or Food Supplements in the EU Available online: https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/news/more-20-algae-species-can-now-be-sold-food-or-food-supplements-eu-2024-02-26_en (accessed on 18 March 2026)

224. Food Standards Agency Novel Foods Authorisation Guidance Available online: https://www.food.gov.uk/business-guidance/regulated-products/novel-foods-guidance (accessed on 18 March 2026)

225. Ebadi A.G. Harnessing Bioactive Metabolites from Marine Algae: A Biotechnological Approach for Drug Discovery and Therapeutic Development Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2025 61 009652 10.26717/BJSTR.2025.61.009652

226. Bouafir Y. Bouhenna M.M. Nebbak A. Belfarhi L. Aouzal B. Boufahja F. Bendif H. Bruno M. Algal bioactive compounds: A review on their characteristics and medicinal properties Fitoterapia 2025 183 106591 10.1016/j.fitote.2025.106591 40339617

227. Rubio C. Napoleone G. Luis-González G. Gutiérrez A.J. González-Weller D. Hardisson A. Revert C. Metals in edible seaweed Chemosphere 2017 173 572 579 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.064 28152409

228. Bogdan C. Molnar M. Dima E.I. Olteanu A.A. Safta D.A. Moldovan M.L. Marine Macroalgae in Topical Formulations: Bioactive Compounds, Variability, Analytical Challenges and Skin Benefits Pharmaceutics 2025 17 1143 10.3390/pharmaceutics17091143 41012480 PMC12473693

229. Gubelit Y.I. Shigaeva T.D. Kudryavtseva V.A. Berezina N.A. Heavy Metal Content in Macroalgae as a Tool for Environmental Quality Assessment: The Eastern Gulf of Finland Case Study J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023 11 1640 10.3390/jmse11091640

230. Silkina A. Ginnever N.E. Fernandes F. Fuentes-Grünewald C. Large-Scale Waste Bio-Remediation Using Microalgae Cultivation as a Platform Energies 2019 12 2772 10.3390/en12142772

231. Warnasooriya V. Gunawardena S. Weththasinghe P. Jayawardana B. Qader M. Liyanage R. Nutritional Properties, Antioxidant Activity, and Heavy Metal Accumulation in Selected Marine Macro-Algae Species of Sri Lanka Nutraceuticals 2024 4 50 64 10.3390/nutraceuticals4010004

232. Doumeizel V. The Seaweed Revolution: How Seaweed Has Shaped Our Past and Can Save Our Future Coombe C. Original work published 2022 Hero Press London, UK 2023

233. Stévant P. Rebours C. Landing facilities for processing of cultivated seaweed biomass: A Norwegian perspective with strategic considerations for the European seaweed industry J. Appl. Phycol. 2021 33 3199 3214 10.1007/s10811-021-02525-w

234. Rumin J. Nicolau E. Gonçalves de Oliveira Junior R. Fuentes-Grünewald C. Picot L. Analysis of scientific research driving microalgae market opportunities in Europe Mar. Drugs 2020 18 264 10.3390/md18050264 32443631 PMC7281102

235. Fuentes-Grunewald C. Bayliss C. Fonlut F. Chapuli E. Long-term dinoflagellate culture performance in a commercial photobioreactor: Amphidinium carterae case Bioresour. Technol. 2016 218 533 540 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.128 27395001

236. Oyón Díaz de Cerio J. Venneri G. Orefice I. Forestiero M. Baena C.R. Tassone G.B. Percopo I. Sardo A. Panno M.L. Giordano F. Effects of Amphidinium carterae Phytocompounds on Proliferation and the Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition Process in T98G Glioblastoma Cells Mar. Drugs 2025 23 173 10.3390/md23040173 40278295 PMC12029094

237. Phinyo K. Ruangrit K. Pekkoh J. Tragoolpua Y. Kaewkod T. Duangjan K. Pumas C. Suwannarach N. Kumla J. Pathom-Aree W. Naturally occurring functional ingredient from filamentous thermophilic cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya sp. KC45: Phytochemical characterizations and their multiple bioactivities Antioxidants 2022 11 2437 10.3390/antiox11122437 36552645 PMC9774153

238. Lee W.-K. Ryu Y.-K. Kim T. Park A. Lee Y.-J. Lee Y. Kim J.H. Oh C. Kang D.-H. Choi W.-Y. Optimization of industrial-scale cultivation conditions to enhance the nutritional composition of nontoxic cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya sp. KIOST-1 Appl. Sci. 2023 14 282 10.3390/app14010282

239. Georgiou D. Exarhopoulos S. Charisis A. Simitsis S. Papapanagiotou G. Samara C. Katsiapi M. Kountrias G. Bouras S. Katsoulas N. Valorization of Monoraphidium sp. microalgal biomass for human nutrition applications J. Appl. Phycol. 2024 36 1293 1309 10.1007/s10811-024-03191-4

240. Wang J. Zhang M. Fang Z. Recent development in efficient processing technology for edible algae: A review Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019 88 251 259 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.03.032

241. Salehipour-Bavarsad F. Nematollahi M.A. Pistocchi R. Pezzolesi L. Algal food safety: Possible contaminations, challenges of harmonized quality assessments, and suggested recommendations for the nascent industry of microalgae-based products Algal Res. 2024 81 103579 10.1016/j.algal.2024.103579

242. Inoue K. Leung A.M. For Iodine-Rich Japan, What’s the Right Amount of Dietary Iodine? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022 107 e2634 e2635 10.1210/clinem/dgac030 35090177

243. Casolari F. Westmoreland A. Vanagt T. Jaspars M. Unpacking policy developments in marine natural product research: A scientist’s guide to DSI and BBNJ Nat. Prod. Rep. 2025 42 1063 1070 10.1039/D4NP00070F 40243009

244. Espuny M. Reis J.S.d.M. Giupponi E.C.B. Rocha A.B.T. Costa A.C.F. Poltronieri C.F. Oliveira O.J.d. The Role of the Triple Helix Model in Promoting the Circular Economy: Government-Led Integration Strategies and Practical Application Recycling 2025 10 50 10.3390/recycling10020050

245. Cai Y. Etzkowitz H. Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future Triple Helix 2020 7 189 226 10.1163/21971927-bja10003

246. Mayho S. Mumford D. Ellis L. Lloyd D.C. Redmond E.C. Clifton N. The evolution of regional triple helix food sector SME interventions: A longitudinal study, Wales, UK Eur. Plan. Stud. 2024 32 2046 2069 10.1080/09654313.2024.2325021

247. Naujokaitytė G. Data Corner: Horizon Success Rates Are Dropping 2025 Available online: https://sciencebusiness.net/news/r-d-funding/horizon-europe/data-corner-horizon-success-rates-are-dropping (accessed on 15 March 2026)

248. Brennecke P. Ferrante M.I. Johnston I.A. Smith D. A Collaborative European Approach to Accelerating Translational Marine Science J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2018 6 81 10.3390/jmse6030081

249. Sorbonne Universite European Marine Biological Research Infrastructure Cluster to promote the Blue Bioeconomy Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/654008 (accessed on 15 March 2026)

250. European Marine Biological Resource Center (EMBRC) EU Projects and Research Infrastructure Activities Available online: https://www.embrc.eu/ (accessed on 15 March 2026)

251. European Molecular Biology Laboratory TREC Partner Snapshot: EMBRC Available online: https://www.embl.org/ (accessed on 15 March 2026)

252. Edrada-Ebel R. Jaspars M. The 9th European Conference on Marine Natural Products Mar. Drugs 2015 13 7150 7249 10.3390/md13127059 26633429 PMC4698589

253. Leuvenk K.U. PHARMASEA Increasing Value and Flow in the Marine Biodiscovery Pipeline. 2012–2017 Available online: https://oceanext.sciencesconf.org/92088/92088.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2026)

254. Univeresity of Galway COMBO Innovative Cultivation Methods for Marine Biodiscovery 2024 Available online: https://research.wur.nl/en/projects/innovative-cultivation-methods-for-marine-biodiscovery/ (accessed on 15 March 2026)

255. Rees H. Rees D. Thomas R. Lewis H. Coombes Z. Davies G. Enhancing Regional Innovation Systems in Cymru (Wales): Lessons from AgorIP and CALIN Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Krakow, Poland 25–26 September 2025 Volume 20 10.34190/ecie.20.1.4201

256. Rijo P. Tasdemir D. Rotter A. Editorial: The multiple applications of marine-derived bioactives Front. Pharmacol. 2025 16 1733987 10.3389/fphar.2025.1733987 41424792 PMC12711704

257. Almaliti J. Gerwick W.H. Methods in marine natural product drug discovery: What’s new? Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2023 18 687 691 10.1080/17460441.2023.2214360 37194298

258. Zhang Q. Lv L. Wang W. Wei M. Gu Y. Shao C. Recent Advances of Bioactive Marine Natural Products in Drug Discovery J. Ocean Univ. China 2024 23 1297 1318 10.1007/s11802-024-5975-4

259. Hussain H. How can we unlock the full potential of marine biological resources for novel drug discovery in an effective and ethical way? Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2024 19 125 130 10.1080/17460441.2023.2285402 37994413

260. Chapter 13 Species diversity: Land and sea Developments in Palaeontology and Stratigraphy Briggs J.C. Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1995 Volume 14 371 389

261. NCT07173062 C.T. Algae Effects in Markers of Cardiovascular Risk and Gut Microbiome: A Placebo-controlled Randomized Double-Blind Trial 2025 Available online: https://app.trialscreen.org/trials/algae-effects-markers-cardiovascular-risk-gut-microbiome-trial-nct07173062 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

262. Lopez-Santamarina A. Cardelle-Cobas A. Mondragon A.D.C. Cepeda A. Rodriguez J.A. Miranda J.M. Modulation of Gut Microbiota by Whole Encapsulated Brown Seaweed (Himanthalia elongata) in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial Nutrients 2025 17 2047 10.3390/nu17122047 40573158 PMC12195854

263. NCT06738329 C.T. Investigating the Impact of the Seaweed Derived Food Additive, Carrageenan, on the Human Gut Microbiome 2024 Available online: https://goodday.health/trials/6738329 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

264. NCT06425094 C.T. Effects of a Microalgae Extract Dietary Supplement on Gut Health, Anxiety, and Immune Function 2024 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06425094 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

265. NCT07263217 C.T. Mechanistic Study on the Protective and Regenerative Effects of Spirulina in Hepatectomy-Related Liver Injury 2025 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07263217 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

266. NCT03535974 C.T. Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Supplement with Spirulina for Amelioration of Benign Thyroid Nodules 2018 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03535974 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

267. NCT06076161 C.T. Effect of Spirulina Platensis Supplementation and Calorie Restriction on Anthropometric, Body Composition, Lipid Profiles, Insulin Resistance, Stress Oxidative Biomarkers in Obese Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol Study 2023 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06076161 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

268. NCT02993627 C.T. Effects of Spirulina Supplementation on Anthropometric Measurements, Lipid Profile, Appetite, Liver Enzymes, Inflammatory and Glycemic Markers on Overweight or Obese Adults 2016 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02993627 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

269. NCT05343858 C.T. Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of the Consumption of Two Unicellular Microalgae (Chlorella Vulgaris and Arthrospira Platensis (Spirulina)) on Metabolic Syndrome Biomarkers in Overweight/Obese Subjects with Altered Lipid Profile 2019 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05343858 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

270. NCT05802797 C.T. Bioavailability and Pharmacodynamics of Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid in Soymilk and Commercial Supplements 2023 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05802797 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

271. Barennes H. Houdart L. de Courville C. Barennes F. Spirulina as a daily nutritional supplement of young pre-school Cambodian children of deprived settings: A single-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial BMC Pediatr. 2022 22 701 10.1186/s12887-022-03766-5 36476193 PMC9727933

272. NCT04567823 C.T. Human Intervention Study for Validating Nutrient Bioavailability From Microalgae 2020 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04567823 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

273. NCT07086573 C.T. The Effect of Algae Oil Supplements on Functional Immune Response and Bioavailability of Lipids in Blood, a Pilot Study 2025 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07086573 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

274. NCT07241377 C.T. A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Subjects to Compare the Bioavailability of EPA + DHA From Two Microalgal Sources in Natural Triglyceride Form to One Fish Source in Re-esterified Triglyceride Form (GOBO 2 Study) 2025 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07241377 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

275. NCT06629103 C.T. A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Subjects to Compare the Bioavailability of EPA + DHA from Two Microalgal Sources to One Fish Source 2024 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06629103 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

276. NCT04278482 C.T. Diseño y Validación en Humanos de un Nuevo Complemento Alimenticio Rico en Ácido Docosahexaenoico (DHA) Procedente de Algas 2020 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04278482 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

277. NCT05640843 C.T. A Randomized Placebo Controlled Study of a Plant-Based Dietary Versus Supplement Versus Placebo Intervention in Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM)—The Nutrition Prevention (NUTRIVENTION-3) Study 2022 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05640843 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

278. US Food and Drug Administration Biologic License Application (BLA): 125388, ADCETRIS Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=125388 (accessed on 30 April 2026)

279. NCT01379729 C.T. Functional Survival of Beta Cell Allografts After Transplantation in the Peritoneal Cavity of Non-Uremic Type 1 Diabetic Patients 2011 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01379729 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

280. NCT00940173 C.T. A Phase I/IIa Open-label Investigation of the Safety and Effectiveness of DIABECELL(R) [Immunoprotected (Alginate-Encapsulated) Porcine Islets for Xenotransplantation] in Patients with Type I Diabetes Mellitus 2009 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00940173 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

281. NCT01736228 C.T. A Phase IIb Open-Label Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of DIABECELL [Immunoprotected (Alginate-Encapsulated) Porcine Islets for Xenotransplantation] in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus 2012 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01736228 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

282. NCT02064309 C.T. An Open Label, Pilot Investigation, to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Transplantation of Macro-encapsulated Human Islets Within the Bioartificial Pancreas Beta-Air in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus 2014 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02064309 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

283. Irhimeh M.R. Fitton J.H. Lowenthal R.M. Fucoidan ingestion increases the expression of CXCR4 on human CD34+ cells Exp. Hematol. 2007 35 989 994 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.02.009 17533053

284. NCT01628081 C.T. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, 18 Week Study To Evaluate the Efficacy of Adjuvant 9-cis-β-Carotene Rich Powder of the Alga Dunaliella Bardawil in Subjects with Plaque Type Psoriasis 2012 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01628081 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

285. Shatalebi M.A. Bokaie Jazi S. Yegdaneh A. Iraji F. Siadat A.H. Noorshargh P. Comparative evaluation of Gracilaria algae 3% cream vs. Clobetasol 0.05% cream in treatment of plaque type psoriasis: A randomized, split-body, triple-blinded clinical trial Dermatol. Ther. 2020 33 e14317 10.1111/dth.14317 32951292

286. Roach L.A. Meyer B.J. Fitton J.H. Winberg P. Oral Supplementation with Algal Sulphated Polysaccharide in Subjects with Inflammatory Skin Conditions: A Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial and Baseline Dietary Differences Mar. Drugs 2023 21 379 10.3390/md21070379 37504910 PMC10381427

287. NCT01045395 C.T. Efficacy of Two Algae Formulations on Lipid Metabolism, Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Status in Individuals with Psoriasis 2010 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01045395 (accessed on 4 May 2026)

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты