BMC oral health · 2026
Role of post design and cement type in fiber post adaptation and retention.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Assis Helena Cristina, Cronenbold Tamara Justiniano, Prado Heitor Silva, Eyüboğlu Tan Fırat, Özcan Mutlu, Sousa-Neto Manoel Damião, Lopes-Olhê Fabiane Carneiro, Mazzi-Chaves Jardel Francisco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Apical voids reduce cement thickness uniformity and increase the risk of post dislodgment. This study evaluated the pull-out force, resin cement thickness, and the volume of voids and gaps in the apical third of two fiberglass posts (Exacto and Reforpost®) luted with RelyX™ ARC (R-ARC) or RelyX™ U200 (R-U200).
METHODS: Thirty-two endodontically treated single-rooted teeth were assigned to two post groups (Exacto, Reforpost®; n = 16), each subdivided according to the resin cement used (R-ARC or R-U200; n = 8). Micro-CT was used to quantify resin cement thickness and apical voids/gaps. Pull-out testing and failure mode analysis were performed. Voids/gaps and pull-out force were analyzed using two-way ANOVA/Tukey, resin cement thickness with three-way ANOVA/Tukey, and failure mode with chi-square.
RESULTS: Reforpost® showed significantly higher pull-out force and thinner cement layers than Exacto (p < 0.05). With R-ARC, the void volume did not differ between posts (p > 0.05), whereas R-U200 used with Reforpost® produced significantly fewer voids than with Exacto (p < 0.05). R-ARC consistently exhibited voids at the post tip and gaps at the post-dentin interface, while R-U200 showed minimal or no voids and improved apical adaptation.
CONCLUSIONS: The parallel-sided serrated post (Reforpost®) combined with a self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (RelyX™ U200) resulted in superior apical adaptation, fewer voids, and higher pull-out strength compared with the smooth tapered post (Exacto) or the conventional cement (RelyX™ ARC). Clinically, selecting a post with better anatomical conformity, together with a self-adhesive resin cement, may enhance post retention and reduce the risk of debonding in endodontically treated teeth.
METHODS: Thirty-two endodontically treated single-rooted teeth were assigned to two post groups (Exacto, Reforpost®; n = 16), each subdivided according to the resin cement used (R-ARC or R-U200; n = 8). Micro-CT was used to quantify resin cement thickness and apical voids/gaps. Pull-out testing and failure mode analysis were performed. Voids/gaps and pull-out force were analyzed using two-way ANOVA/Tukey, resin cement thickness with three-way ANOVA/Tukey, and failure mode with chi-square.
RESULTS: Reforpost® showed significantly higher pull-out force and thinner cement layers than Exacto (p < 0.05). With R-ARC, the void volume did not differ between posts (p > 0.05), whereas R-U200 used with Reforpost® produced significantly fewer voids than with Exacto (p < 0.05). R-ARC consistently exhibited voids at the post tip and gaps at the post-dentin interface, while R-U200 showed minimal or no voids and improved apical adaptation.
CONCLUSIONS: The parallel-sided serrated post (Reforpost®) combined with a self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (RelyX™ U200) resulted in superior apical adaptation, fewer voids, and higher pull-out strength compared with the smooth tapered post (Exacto) or the conventional cement (RelyX™ ARC). Clinically, selecting a post with better anatomical conformity, together with a self-adhesive resin cement, may enhance post retention and reduce the risk of debonding in endodontically treated teeth.